SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı:

A Research on the Relationship Between Job Crafting, Psychological Empowerment and Turnover Intention

İş Şekillendirme Davranışı, Psikolojik Güçlendirme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Eren KILIÇ
Berivan TATAR
Oya ERDİL
Pages
192–200
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results, the conclusion can be drawn that employees who are psychologically empowered develop crafting behaviors more than others, also, employees cognitively crafting their jobs have increased the possibility to stay in their jobs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the relationship between psychological empowerment perception, employee turnover intention, and job crafting behavior which is composed of task crafting, cognitive crafting, and relational crafting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By examining 238 public and private sector employees in Turkey and using structural equation modeling analysis, the results of this study empirically show that (1) psychological empowerment is positively related to task crafting, cognitive crafting and relational crafting behaviors, (2) cognitive crafting behavior is negatively related to employee turnover intention while other crafting behaviors have not any significant relation with employee turnover intention, and (3) surprisingly there is not any significant relationship between psychological empowerment and employee turnover intention.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results, the conclusion can be drawn that employees who are psychologically empowered develop crafting behaviors more than others, also, employees cognitively crafting their jobs have increased the possibility to stay in their jobs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İş Şekillendirme · Psikolojik Güçlendirme · İşten Ayrılma Niyeti

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between psychological empowerment perception, employee turnover intention, and job crafting behavior which is composed of task crafting, cognitive crafting, and relational crafting. By examining 238 public and private sector employees in Turkey and using structural equation modeling analysis, the results of this study empirically show that (1) psychological empowerment is positively related to task crafting, cognitive crafting and relational crafting behaviors, (2) cognitive crafting behavior is negatively related to employee turnover intention while other crafting behaviors have not any significant relation with employee turnover intention, and (3) surprisingly there is not any significant relationship between psychological empowerment and employee turnover intention. Based on the results, the conclusion can be drawn that employees who are psychologically empowered develop crafting behaviors more than others, also, employees cognitively crafting their jobs have increased the possibility to stay in their jobs.

Özet

Bu araştırma, iş şekillendirme davranışlarını oluşturan görev şekillendirme, bilişsel şekillendirme ve ilişkisel şekillendirme davranışları ile psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında Türkiye’de kamu ve özel sektörde görev yapan 238 çalışanın verileri yapısal eşitlik modeli analizi kullanılarak incelenmiş ve elde edilen sonuçlar (1) psikolojik güçlendirme ile görev şekillendirme, bilişsel şekillendirme ve ilişkisel şekillendirme davranışları arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunduğunu, (2) bilişsel şekillendirme davranışı ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında negatif bir ilişkinin tespit edildiğini, ancak diğer iş şekillendirme davranışları ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmadığını, ve (3) şaşırtıcı bir biçimde psikolojik güçlendirme ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin bulunmadığını ampirik olarak göstermektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlara dayanarak, psikolojik olarak güçlendirilen çalışanların diğerlerine göre daha fazla iş şekillendirme davranışı geliştirdikleri, ayrıca bilişsel olarak işlerini şekillendiren çalışanların ise işlerinde kalma ihtimallerinin daha yüksek olduğuna ulaşılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, E., TATAR, B., ERDİL, O. (2020). A Research on the Relationship Between Job Crafting, Psychological Empowerment and Turnover Intention. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı:, 192–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/193657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Andela, Marie, and Margot van der Doef. 2019. “A Comprehensive Assessment of the Person-Environment Fit Dimensions and Their Relationships With Work-Related Outcomes.” Journal of Career Development 46 (5): 567–82.
  2. Bagozzi, Richard P., and Youjae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94.
  3. Bakker, Arnold B., and Evangelia Demerouti. 2017. “Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 22 (3): 273–85.
  4. Bakker, Arnold B., Maria Tims, and Daantje Derks. 2012. “Proactive Personality and Job Performance: The Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement.” Human Relations 65 (10): 1359–78.
  5. Beer, Leon T de, Maria Tims, and Arnold B Bakker. 2016. “Job Crafting and Its Impact on Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction in Mining and Manufacturing.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 19 (3): 400–412.
  6. Berg, Justin M., Amy Wrzesniewski, and Jane E. Dutton. 2010. “Perceiving and Responding to Challenges in Job Crafting at Different Ranks: When Proactivity Requires Adaptivity.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 30 (31, 2010): 158–86.
  7. Bipp, Tanja, and Evangelia Demerouti. 2015. “Which Employees Craft Their Jobs and How? Basic Dimensions of Personality and Employees’ Job Crafting Behaviour.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88 (4): 631–55.
  8. Bruning, Patrick F., and Michael A. Campion. 2018. “A Role-Resource Approach-Avoidance Model of Job Crafting: A Multimethod Integration and Extension of Job Crafting Theory.” Academy of Management Journal 61 (2): 499–522.
  9. Conger, J. A., and R. N. Kanungo. 1988. “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice.” Academy of Management Review 13 (3): 471–82.
  10. Cotton, John L, and Jeffrey M Tuttle. 1986. “Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research.” Academy of Management 11 (1): 55–70.
  11. Demerouti, Evangelia. 2014. “Design Your Own Job through Job Crafting.” European Psychologist 19 (4): 237–43.
  12. Demerouti, Evangelia, Arnold B. Bakker, and Josette M.P. Gevers. 2015. “Job Crafting and Extra-Role Behavior: The Role of Work Engagement and Flourishing.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 91: 87–96.
  13. Demerouti, Evangelia, Friedhelm Nachreiner, Arnold B. Bakker, and Wilmar B. Schaufeli. 2001. “The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 499–512.
  14. Dominguez, Luis Carlos, Laurents Stassen, Willem de Grave, Alv