Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Early O utcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in Pediatric Kidney Stones: Preliminary Study

Çocuklarda Böbrek Taşlarında Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahinin (RİRC) Erken Dönem Sonuçları: Ön Çalışma

Pages
131–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We believe that RIRS is a reliable endourologic option with a high achievement rate, shorter hospitalization period and low complication rate in selected childhood patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to present the results of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney ston es in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method:Demographic data of the patients to whom RIRS was performed in Pediatric Surgery-Pediatric Urology clinic of Dicle University between 2015-2016 was evaluated retrospectively and outcomes were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We believe that RIRS is a reliable endourologic option with a high achievement rate, shorter hospitalization period and low complication rate in selected childhood patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to present the results of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney ston es in our clinic. Material and Method:Demographic data of the patients to whom RIRS was performed in Pediatric Surgery-Pediatric Urology clinic of Dicle University between 2015-2016 was evaluated retrospectively and outcomes were analyzed. Size of the stone was mentioned as the longest measure calculated in one dimension through with ultrasonography and direct urinary system graphy. The RIRS procedure was performed by a flexible uret eroscope through the urethral sheath under general anesthesia, and the stones were fractured with a holmium laser.While relatively large stones were taken out with the help of forceps, small pieces were left to be thrown naturally. Results: RIRS was applied to 10 patients with an average age of 8 years (2-12). Seven (70%) of the patients were male and 3 (30%) were female. The stones were located in the right half of the patients and in the left kidney. In the history of patients; 4 (60%) patients had performed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and 2 patients had performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The stones were located in the lower calyx in 7 patients, in the pelvis in 2 patients and in the middle calyx in 1 patient. Average size of the stones were 9,7 mm (7-12 mm). Seven (70%) patients underwent passive dilatation before RIRS. Sheath was used in 7 (70%) patients during RIRS. Duration of the procedure was 54 (46 -83) minutes in average. Hematuria improved by conservative treatment was observed in two (20%) patients. The stone-free rate was 90% for one session and in one patient it was 100% stone-free with second RIRS. Conclusion: We believe that RIRS is a reliable endourologic option with a high achievement rate, shorter hospitalization period and low complication rate in selected childhood patients.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde böbrek taşı nedeniyle Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahi (RİRC) uygulanan hastaların sonuçlarının sunulması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Dicle Üniversitesi Çocuk Cerrahisi-Çocuk Ürolojisi kliniğinde, 2015-2016 yılları arasında RİRC uygulanan hastaların demografik verileri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirilip analiz edildi. Taş boyutu ultrasonografi ve direkt üriner sistem grafisi ile tek boyutta hesaplanan en uzun ölçüm olarak belirtildi. RİRC işlemi, genel anestezi altında üretere yerleştirilen sheath içinden fleksibl üreteroskop ile böbreğe ulaşılıp, holmium lazer ile taşlar fragmante edilerek yapıldı. Nispeten büyük parçalar forseps yardımıyla dışarı alınırken küçük parçalar doğal yolla atılmaya bırakıldı. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 8 yıl (2-12 yaş) olan 10 hastaya RİRC uygulandı. Hastaların 7 (%70)'si erkek, 3 (%30)'ü kız idi. Taşlar, hastaların yarısında sağ, yarısında sol böbrek yerleşimli idi. Özgeçmişlerinde 4 hastaya estrakorporeal şok dalga litotiripsi , 2 hastaya ise perkütan nefrolitotomi yapılmış- tı. Taşlar 7 hastada alt kaliks, 2'sinde pelvis, 1 hastada ise orta kaliks yerleşimli idi. Taş boyutları ortalama 9,7 mm (7-12) idi. Yedi (%70) hastada RİRC öncesi pasif dilatasyon yapıldı. Yedi (%70) hastada RİRC esnasında sheath kullanıldı. Operasyon süresi ortalama 54 (46-83) dakika idi. İki (%20) hastada konservatif tedavi ile düzelen hematüri görüldü. Taşsızlık oranı tek seansta %90 olup, 1 hastada ise ikinci kez RİRC yapılarak %100 taşsızlık sağlandı. Sonuç:RİRC'in, seçilmiş çocuk hastalarda başarı şansı yüksek, hastanede kalış süresi kısa, komplikasyon oranı düşük bir endoüroloji seçeneği olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYTUN, H., ARSLAN, S., ARSLAN, M. Ş., BASUGUY, E., AYDOĞDU, B., OKUR, M. H., ÖNEN, A., OTÇU, S. (2017). Early O utcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in Pediatric Kidney Stones: Preliminary Study. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 131–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/193392

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES. Extendingcystoscopic techniques into the ureter and renalpelvis. Experience with ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy. JAMA 1983; 250: 2002-5
  2. Akpınar H, Tüfek İ, Gürtug A, Kural AR. Üstüriner sistem hastalıklarının tanı ve tedavisindefleksibl üreteroskopi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2003; 29: 454-9
  3. Önen A. Pediatrik üriner taşlara minimal invazifyaklaşım. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi 2016; 30: 156-64
  4. Tanimoto R, Cleary RC, Bagley DH, Hubosky SG.Ureteral avulsion associated with ureteroscopy: insightsfrom the MAUDE database. J Endourol 2016; 30: 257-61
  5. Mandeville JA, Nelson CP. Pediatric urolithiasis.Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 419-23
  6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classificationof surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluationin a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13
  7. Yürük E, Atar A, Çakır ÖO, Altıok E ve ark.Çocukluk çağı taş hastalığı tedavisinde retrogradintrarenal cerrahi kısa dönem sonuçları: Güvenilir ve etkili bir yöntem. Haseki Tıp Bülteni 2015; 53:52-6
  8. Bak M, Ural R, Agin H, Serdaroğlu E et al. Themetabolic etiology of urolithiasis in Turkish children.Int Urol Nephrol 2009; 41: 453-60
  9. Alpay H, Ozen A, Gokce I et al. Clinical andmetabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasisin children. Pediatr Nephrol 2009; 24: 2203-9
  10. Kim TB, Park HK, Lee KY. Life-threateningcomplication after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyfor a renal stone: A hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Korean J Urol 2010; 51: 212-5
  11. Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, Stoller ML. Complicationsassociated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Transl Androl Urol 2012;1: 223-8
  12. De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H et al. Percutaneousnephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenalsurgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 125-37
  13. Resorlu B, Sancak EB, Resorlu M, Gulpinar MT, etal. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in pediatric patients.World J Nephrol 2014; 63: 193-7
  14. Tanaka ST, Makari JH, Pope JC, Adams MC,Brock JW, Thomas JC. Pediatric ureteroscopic managementof intrarenal calculi. J Urol 2008; 180: 2150-3
  15. Kolon TF, Canter D, White M, Casale P.Pediatric flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Thechildren's hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol 2008; 180: 2616-9
  16. Cannon GM, Smaldone MC, Wu HY, et al. Ureteroscopicmanagement of lower-pole stones in a pediatricpopulation. J Endourol 2007; 21: 1179-82
  17. Auge BK, Dahm P, Wu NZ, Preminger GM.Ureteroscopic man