Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy in Patients with Recurrent or Persistent Varicocele

Pages
64–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With a minimum 6-month follow-up, the overall pregnancy rate was 37.5% (n=12) including 18.7% (n=6) of pregnancies achieved through natural intercourse, 9.3% (n=3) of them with IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and 9.3% (n=3) with intrauterine insemination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Varicocele may be treated with many different modalities including radiological and surgical approaches but what is the best treatment remains controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The recurrence rate following varicocele repair is up to 45%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With a minimum 6-month follow-up, the overall pregnancy rate was 37.5% (n=12) including 18.7% (n=6) of pregnancies achieved through natural intercourse, 9.3% (n=3) of them with IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and 9.3% (n=3) with intrauterine insemination.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Varicocele may be treated with many different modalities including radiological and surgical approaches but what is the best treatment remains controversial. The recurrence rate following varicocele repair is up to 45%. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of microsurgical varicocelectomy in varicocele recurrence. Methods: In our clinic, 32 men who treated with persistent or recurrent varicocele were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with artery and lymphatic sparing subinguinal microsurgical technique. Age, pre-operative and post-operative semen parameters, serum testosterone levels, post-operative pregnancy rates, testicular volumes, and complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Postoperatively, mean serum testosterone levels increased. Median sperm concentrations and motility rates also increased. With a minimum 6-month follow-up, the overall pregnancy rate was 37.5% (n=12) including 18.7% (n=6) of pregnancies achieved through natural intercourse, 9.3% (n=3) of them with IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and 9.3% (n=3) with intrauterine insemination. No complications such as hydrocele, hematoma, and wound infection were observed during the follow-up period. Discussion and Conclusion: In this study, treatment of recurrent varicocele with subinguinal microsurgical technique seems to be effective method with improving semen parameters and without a significant risk of post-operative complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOBAY, R., TAHRA, A., SUÇEKEN, F. Y., ŞEN, U. T., KÜÇÜK, E. V. (2019). Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy in Patients with Recurrent or Persistent Varicocele. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 64–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/193328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1,294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1971;22:469–74. [CrossRef ] 2. Lord DJ, Burrows PE. Pediatric varicocele embolization. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;6:169–75. [CrossRef ] 3. Hawkins CM, Racadio JM, McKinney DN, Racadio JM, Vu DN. Varicocele retrograde embolization with boiling contrast medium and gelatin sponges in adolescent subjects: a clinically effective therapeutic alternative. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:206–10. [CrossRef ] 4. Gorelick J, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993;59:613–6. [CrossRef ] 5. Witt MA, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: a progressive or static lesion? Urology 1993;42:541–3. [CrossRef ] 6. Robinson SP, Hampton LJ, Koo HP. Treatment strategy for the adolescent varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 2011;37:269–78. 7. Iaccarino V, Venetucci P. Interventional radiology of male varicocele: current status. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012;35:1262–80. [CrossRef ] 8. Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian J Androl 2016;18:229–33. [CrossRef ] 9. Grober ED, Chan PT, Zini A, Goldstein M. Microsurgical treatment of persistent or recurrent varicocele. Fertil Steril 2004;82:718–22. [CrossRef ] 10. Belli L. Venography of postoperative recurrence of symptomatic varicocele in males. [Article in Italian]. Radiol Med 1998;95:470–3. 11. Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl 2009;30:33–40. [CrossRef ] 12. Moon KH, Cho SJ, Kim KS, Park S, Park S. Recurrent Varicoceles: Causes and Treatment Using Angiography and Magnification Assisted Subinguinal Varicocelectomy. Yonsei Med J 2012;53:723–8. [CrossRef ] 13. Yan TZ, Wu XQ, Wang ZW. Treatment effect of TUSPLV on recurrent varicocele. Exp Ther Med 2017;13:45–8. [CrossRef ] 14. Guevara CJ, El-Hilal AH, Darcy MD. Percutaneous Antegrade Varicocele Embolization Via the Testicular Vein in a Patient with Recurrent Varicocele After Surgical Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38:1325–9. [CrossRef ] 15. Chen SS. Predictive factors of successful redo varicocelectomy in infertile patients with recurrent varicocele. Andrologia 2014;46:738–43. [CrossRef ] 16. Karakeçi A, Orhan İ. Diagnosis and treatment of recurrent varicocele. Androl Bul 2018;20:49–53. 17. Madjar S, Moskovitz B, Issaq E, Weinberger M, Nativ O. Low inguinal approach for correction of recurrent varicocele. Int Urol Nephrol 1998;30:69–73. [CrossR