Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

Determination of In Vitro Activity of Linezolid in Resistance Gram-positive Bacteria by E-Test Method

Pages
25–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that all strains were fully susceptible to linezolid (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤2 μG/ml).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The incidence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria is increasing in the past years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pathogens such as glycopeptid-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have emerged widely and they contribute an increase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that all strains were fully susceptible to linezolid (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤2 μG/ml).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The incidence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria is increasing in the past years. The pathogens such as glycopeptid-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have emerged widely and they contribute an increase. The treatment of the patients infected with the multidrug-resistant pathogens is extremely difficult. The aim of this study was to determine in vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and staphylococci against linezolid that may provide new alternative to treat. Methods: A total of 80 isolates of staphylococci (30 MRSA, 30 MSSA, and 20 Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci [MRCoNS]) obtained from various clinical specimens and 20 VRE isolates recovered from blood and rectal swab specimens were sent to our microbiology laboratory. Linezolid susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion methods and E-test for all isolates. In addition, for all isolates, sensitivity to other antibacterials was detected by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method according to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results: The results showed that all strains were fully susceptible to linezolid (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤2 μG/ml). The linezolid effectiveness is not different between the MRSA and MSSA strains. MICs were changed for MRSA from 0.018 to 2 μg/ml, MSSA from 0.25 to 1.5 μg/ml, and MRCoNS from 0.19 to 1 μg/ml. MICs were changed from 0.38 to 2 μg/ ml for VRE strains. Discussion and Conclusion: As a result of the present study, it was decided that linezolid appears to be a good alternative in the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, especially those resistant to glycopeptides or with reduced sensitivity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOMOĞLU, Ş., KAYA, Ş., CERAN, N., AKSÖZ, S., ÖZTÜRK, S., KARAGÖZ, G. (2019). Determination of In Vitro Activity of Linezolid in Resistance Gram-positive Bacteria by E-Test Method. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 25–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/193327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ulusoy S. Gram-pozitif etkinliği olan antibiyotikler. In: Ulusoy S, Usluer G, Ünal S, editors. Önemli ve sorunlu gram pozitif bakteri infeksiyonları’nda. Ankara: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2004. p.353–66
  2. Kloss WE, Schleifer KH. Staphylococcus. In: Sneath PH, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Hol JG editors. Bergery’s Manuel of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume: II. Baltimore: Williams-Wilkins; 1986. p.1013–35
  3. Ünal S. Akhan S. Stafilokok infeksiyonları. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G. Doğanay M, editors. Infeksiyon Hastalıkları Kitabı. 1st edition. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 1996. p.773–81
  4. Archer GL, Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulasenegative staphylococci. In: Mandell G, Bennet J E. Dolin R, editors. Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease. 5th edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990
  5. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, et al; Vancomycin-Resistant Staphyloccocus aureus Investigate Team. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Eng J Med 2003;348:1342–7. [CrossRef ] 6. Şardan YÇ. Enterokoklarda direnç sorunu. Yeni ve Yeniden Gündeme Gelen İnfeksiyonlar. Ankara. Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi: 2004. p.10–6
  6. Küçükbayrak A, Özdemir D. Two new protein synthesis inhibitors: Linezolid and streptogramins (quinupristin/dalfoprustin). Turkish Journal of Infection 2006:20:145–51
  7. Gonlugur U, Akkurt I, Ozdemir L, Bakici MZ, Icagasioglu S, Gultekin F. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of respiratory isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a Turkish university hospital. Acra Microbiologica Polonica 2003;52:142–8
  8. Livermore DM. Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci. Int J An timicrob Agents 2000;16:S3–10. [CrossRef ] 10. Şengül D. Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphyloccocci. Turkey Map 2003-2004. Ankem Derg 2005;19:54–60
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). In: Başustaoğlu A, Gülay Z, Köksal İ, Özinel MA, Söyletir G, Sümerkan B, translation editors. Antimikrobik Duyarlılık Testleri için Uygulama Stabdartları; Onyedinci Bilgi Eki. Ankara: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2007. p. 44–56 12. Sipahi OR, Pullukçu H, Aydemir Ş, Taşbakan M, Tunger A, Arda B, et al. Resistance Patterns of Microbiologically Confirmed Nosocomial Bacteremia Related Staphylococcus aureus Strains: Evaluation of Results of 2001-2005 Periods. Ankem Derg 2007;21:1–4
  10. Dizbay M, Sipahi AB, Günal Ö, Kırca F, Şanal L, Çağlar K, et al. Investigation of Glycopeptid and Linezolid Resistanc