Journals / Anatomy / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Morphological changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction and effectiveness of different treatment methods

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
102–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the fossa depth showed a significant correlation with muscle size (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) results in changes in anatomical structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 34 TMD patients (18–62 years of age) were randomly divided into two treatment groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the fossa depth showed a significant correlation with muscle size (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:mandibular fossa · masticatory muscle · temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Abstract

Objectives: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) results in changes in anatomical structures. The aim of this study was to examine the morphological changes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment methods in patients with TMD. Methods: 34 TMD patients (18–62 years of age) were randomly divided into two treatment groups. Group A (n=18) was subjected to dry needling (DN) and mobilization for 10 sessions, Group B (n=16) was instructed to use occlusal splint with home exercises for one month. The control group included MRIs of 17 healthy adults that were randomly selected from the archives of Radiology Department of Mustafa Kemal University. The length and width of the masseter, lateral and medial pterygoid muscles and the depth of the mandibular fossa were measured and mandibular condyle types were recorded. Range of motion of each temporomandibular joint was evaluated in pre- and post-treatment periods to test the effectiveness of the treatment methods. Results: The size of the masticatory muscles in TMD group was significantly smaller than the control group (p0.05). However, the fossa depth showed a significant correlation with muscle size (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, F., ÇİÇEKCİBAŞI, A. E., ATCI, N., KELEŞ, F. Ö., YUCEKAYA, B., HÜZMELİ, E. D., DAMLAR, İ. (2020). Morphological changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction and effectiveness of different treatment methods. Anatomy, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 102–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/193137

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al.; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.
  2. Davoudi A, Khaki H, Mohammadi I, Daneshmand M, Tamizifar A, Bigdelou M, Ansaripoor F. Is arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint with corticosteroids beneficial? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:367–75.
  3. Mathew AL, Sholapurkar AA, Pai KM. Condylar changes and its association with age, TMD, and dentition status: a cross-sectional study. Int J Dent 2011;2011:413639. Van Bellinghen X, Idoux-Gillet Y, Pugliano M, Strub M, Bornert F, Clauss F, Schwinté P, Keller L, Benkirane-Jessel N, KuchlerBopp S, Lutz JC, Fioretti F. Temporomandibular joint regenerative medicine. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:446. Murphy MK, MacBarb RF, Wong ME, Athanasiou KA. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of etiology, clinical management, and tissue engineering strategies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:393–414.
  4. Iwasaki LR, Liu H, Gonzalez YM, Marx DB, Nickel JC. Modeling of muscle forces in humans with and without temporomandibular joint disorders. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18 Suppl 1:170–9.
  5. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Iranpour S, Mirhadi S, Paknahad M. Cone-beam computed tomographic assessment of mandibular condylar position in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction and in healthy subjects. Int J Dent 2015;2015:301796. Imanimoghaddam M, Madani AS, Mahdavi P, Bagherpour A, Darijani M, Ebrahimnejad H. Evaluation of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Imaging Sci Dent 2016;46:127–31.
  6. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Akhlaghian M, Abolvardi M. Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction? J Dent (Shiraz) 2016;17: 134–41.
  7. Garip H, Tufekcioglu S, Kaya E. Changes in the temporomandibular joint disc and temporal and masseter muscles secondary to bruxism in Turkish patients. Saudi Med J 2018;39:81–5.
  8. Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C. Impact of functional mandibular advancement appl