Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Biology Curriculums from the Tanzimat Reform To Today

Pages
35–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A constructivist approach has been adopted and instruction programs have been developed within a cyclical and integrated approach after 2000s.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyze the contents of the courses related to biology education in primary and secondary education institutions and to introduce the related developments and transformations by comparing the period of change and curriculums of those courses from Ottoman Empire from the Tanzimat reform to today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the current study, it is seen that biology curriculum has been given as not an individual course but within an integrated understanding which includes the subjects like nature, agriculture, medicine and geology and information which should be known by a student in daily life during the modernization period of Ottoman Empire as a result of current study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A constructivist approach has been adopted and instruction programs have been developed within a cyclical and integrated approach after 2000s.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the contents of the courses related to biology education in primary and secondary education institutions and to introduce the related developments and transformations by comparing the period of change and curriculums of those courses from Ottoman Empire from the Tanzimat reform to today. Our study is based on document analysis. As a result of the current study, it is seen that biology curriculum has been given as not an individual course but within an integrated understanding which includes the subjects like nature, agriculture, medicine and geology and information which should be known by a student in daily life during the modernization period of Ottoman Empire as a result of current study. Developments in biology were reflected even partially to curriculum but lack of supporting materials of the course and the fact that courses were always given theoretically and not supported by laboratory and equipment stand out as most important deficiencies. Program for primary schools were handled mainly until 1950s and biology instruction programs were developed in the following years and scientific developments were tried to be followed within these programs in the republic period. A constructivist approach has been adopted and instruction programs have been developed within a cyclical and integrated approach after 2000s.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, S. K., KURT, M. (2015). Biology Curriculums from the Tanzimat Reform To Today. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 35–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/192846

References (13)

  1. Ayas, A., Çepni, S. ve Akdeniz, A.R. (1993), "The Development of the Turkish Secondary Science Curriculum", Science Education, 77(4), 433-440.
  2. Bas, T. ve Akturan, U. (2013). Nitel arastırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Seçkin Yayıncılık Demirel, F. (2010). Mekteb-i İdâdî. Yayımlanmamıs Doktora Tezi. Ataturk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Erzurum. Doğanay, F. K. (2011). Tanzîmât'tan Cumhuriyet'e Rusdiye Mektepleri. Yayımlanmamıs Doktora Tezi, Ataturk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Erzurum. Doktor Esad Serafeddin, (A.H. 1329). İlm-i nebatat, Karabet Matbaası, İstanbul. Dustûr. (13 Aralık 1896). I. Tertip. Ergun, M. (2000). Medreseden Mektebe Osmanlı Eğitim Sistemindeki Değisme, Yeni Turkiye. Ankara. 3, 747 -748. Ergun, M., (1996).İkinci Mesrûtiyet Devrinde Eğitim Hareketleri (1908-1914),
  4. Ankara.
  5. Gezer, K., Köse, S., Durkan, N., Usak, M. (2003). Biyoloji Alanında Yapılan Program Gelistirme Çalısmalarının Karsılastırılması: Turkiye, İngiltere ve ABD Örneği, Pamukkale Universitesi Eğitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14 (2), 49-62.
  6. Hızlı, M. (2008). Osmanlı Eğitim Tarihi'nin arsiv ve yazma kaynakları, Turkiye Arastırmaları Literatur Dergisi. 6, 577-592. Hulûsi, (1326-1328).
  7. İlm-i Hayvanat, Karabet Matbaası, İstanbul.
  8. İshakoğlu, S. (1995), 1900-1946 Yılları Arasında Darulfunun ve İstanbul Universitesi Fen Fakultesi'nde Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi, Osmanlı Bilimi Arastırmaları, ed. Feza Gunergun, İ.U. Edebiyat Fakultesi, İstanbul, 217-283.
  9. İshakoğlu, S. (1998), 1900-1946 Yılları Arasında Darulfunun ve İstanbul Universitesi Fen Fakultesi'nde Botanik, Zooloji ve Jeoloji Eğitimi, Osmanlı Bilimi Arastırmaları II, ed. Feza Gunergun, İstanbul, İ.U. Edebiyat Fakultesi, 319-348. Kızlara Mahsus Hıfz-us-sıhhat (İkinci Kitap), 1316, Karabet matbaası, İstanbul.
  10. Koçer, H.A. (1987),
  11. Turkiye'de Modern Eğitimin Doğusu, Uzman Yayınları,
  12. Ankara.
  13. Mahmud Cevad (2001). Maârif-I Umûmiyye Nezareti Tarihçe-i Teskilat ve İcraatı XIX. Asır Osmanlı Maârif Tarihi. Ankara: Yeni Turkiye Yayınları. MEB, (2013). Biyoloji Dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı, http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72 (30.05.2015). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB], (1985). Lise ve Dengi Okullarda tek Tip uygulanacak Olan Fizik, Kimya, Biyoloji, Öğretim Programları. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu, 150, Ankara. Salnâme-i Nezâret-i Maârif-i Umûmiyye. (A.H. 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1321). Turgut, F. (1990). Turkiye'de Fen Ve Matematik Programlarını Yenileme Çalısmaları, H.U. Eğitim Fakultesi Der