Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Prediction of host-pathogen protein interactions by extended network model

Pages
138–148
Publication Date
2021-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical results showed that integrating the host and pathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Knowledge of the pathogen-host interactions between the species is essentialin order to develop a solution strategy against infectious diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main scope of this paper is integrating the known protein interactions between thehost and pathogen organisms to improve the prediction success rate of unknown pathogen-host interactions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical results showed that integrating the host and pathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Infectious diseases · host-pathogen interactions · protein-protein interactions

Abstract

Knowledge of the pathogen-host interactions between the species is essentialin order to develop a solution strategy against infectious diseases. In vitro methods take extended periods of time to detect interactions and provide very few of the possible interaction pairs. Hence, modelling interactions between proteins has necessitated the development of computational methods. The main scope of this paper is integrating the known protein interactions between thehost and pathogen organisms to improve the prediction success rate of unknown pathogen-host interactions. Thus, the truepositive rate of the predictions was expected to increase.In order to perform this study extensively, encoding methods and learning algorithms of several proteins were tested. Along with human as the host organism, two different pathogen organisms were used in the experiments. For each combination of protein-encoding and prediction method, both the original prediction algorithms were tested using only pathogen-host interactions and the same methodwas testedagain after integrating the known protein interactions within each organism. The effect of merging the networks of pathogen-host interactions of different species on the prediction performance of state-of-the-art methods was also observed. Successwas measured in terms of Matthews correlation coefficient, precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy metrics. Empirical results showed that integrating the host and pathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOSESOY, I., GOK, M., KAHVECİ, T. (2021). Prediction of host-pathogen protein interactions by extended network model. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 138–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/192650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Baldi P., 2001, BIOINFORMATICS MACHI, V2nd ed Bhargava N, 2013, P INT J ADV RES COMP, V3 Bhasin M, 2004, J BIOL CHEM, V279, P23262, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M401932200 Bock JR, 2003,
  2. BIOINFORMATICS, V19, P125, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.125 Bock JR, 2001,
  3. BIOINFORMATICS, V17, P455, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.5.455 Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324 Calderone A, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pD588, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku830 Chen J, 2007, AMINO ACIDS, V33, P423, DOI 10.1007/s00726-006-0485-9 Cleary S, 1995, EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION IN ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, P108 Dasarathy BV, 1991, IEEE COMPUTER SOC TU Davis J., 2006, P 23 INT C MACHINE L, P233, DOI DOI 10.1145/1143844.1143874 De Bodt S, 2009, BMC GENOMICS, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-10-288 Dyer MD, 2011, INFECT GENET EVOL, V11, P917, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.02.022 Friedman N, 1997, MACH LEARN, V29, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1007465528199 Guirimand T, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pD583, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1121 Hall M., 2009, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS, V11, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278, 10.1145/1656274.1656278] Kanehisa M, 2017, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V45, pD353, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkw1092 Kosesoy I, 2019, COMPUT BIOL CHEM, V78, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.12.001 Ksesoy I, 2018, J COMPUT BIOL, V25, P1120, DOI 10.1089/cmb.2018.0049 Kshirsagar M, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9649, P53 Kshirsagar M, 2013, NIPS WORK MACH LEARN, P3 Kshirsagar M, 2013,
  4. BIOINFORMATICS, V29, P217, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt245 Martin S, 2005,
  5. BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P218, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth483 Mei SY, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079606 Mondal KC, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS MODELS, METHODS AND ALGORITHMS, P164, DOI 10.5220/0003769001540173 Mukhopadhyay A, 2010, 2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB), P344, DOI 10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735401 Muralidharan V, 2012, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V12, P2023, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.021 Naghavi M, 2015,
  6. LANCET, V385, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 Nanni L, 2005,
  7. NEUROCOMPUTING, V68, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.03.004 Nourani E, 2015, FRONT MICROBIOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00094 Orchard S, 2014, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V42, pD358, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1115 Qi YJ, 2010,
  8. BIOINFORMATICS, V26, pi645, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq394 Ray S, 2012, PROC INT CONF EMERG, P28, DOI 10.1109/EAIT.2012.6407854 Shen JW, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI US