Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

A Case of Complete Chorioamniotic Membrane Separation after Amniocentesis Resulted with a Healthy Term Delivery

Pages
168–170
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there are no established guidelines to follow, close followup may CMS can be managed to be a morbid, rather than mortal condition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Separation between amniotic and chorionic membranes is a normal sonographic finding before 14thweeks of gestation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As pregnancy progresses, these membranes fuse and chorionic cavity becomesobliterated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there are no established guidelines to follow, close followup may CMS can be managed to be a morbid, rather than mortal condition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Separation between amniotic and chorionic membranes is a normal sonographic finding before 14thweeks of gestation. As pregnancy progresses, these membranes fuse and chorionic cavity becomesobliterated. Chorioamniotic membrane separation may occur spontaneously or as a complication of invasive intrauterine procedures. Following invasive fetal intervention, resulting in a condition referred toas chorioamniotic membrane separation (CMS) and it is reported to be associated with adverse perinatal fetal outcomes. Here we present a case of CMS that had occurred after a second trimester amniocentesis and resulted with the delivery of a term healthy baby. Complete post-interventional CMS maycomplicate pregnancy progression. Although there are no established guidelines to follow, close followup may CMS can be managed to be a morbid, rather than mortal condition.

🔖

Cite This Article

ENSARİ, T. A., ALDEMİR, O., YİRCİ, B., ESİN, S., YALVAÇ, S., KANDEMİR, Ö. (2016). A Case of Complete Chorioamniotic Membrane Separation after Amniocentesis Resulted with a Healthy Term Delivery. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 168–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/192612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Filly RA. Ultrasound evaluation during the first trimester. In Callen PW, ed. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rded. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1996;p89 Appelman Z, Zalel Y, Fried S, Caspi B. Delayed fusion of amnion and chorion: a possible association with trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11(4):303-304.
  2. Ulm B, Ulm MR, Bernaschek G. Unfused amnion and chorion after 14 weeks of gestation: associated fetal struc- tural and chromosomal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13(6):392-395
  3. Lewi L, Hanssens M, Spitz B, Deprest J. Complete chorioamniotic membrane separation. Case report and re- view of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19(1):78-82. Seeds JW. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(2):607-615.
  4. Levine D, Callen PW, Pender SG, et al. Chorioamniotic separation after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: importance and frequency. Radiology 1998;209(1):175- 181. Ashkenazy M, Borenstein R, Katz Z, Segal M. Constriction of the umbilical cord by an amniotic band after midtrimester amniocentesis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61(1):89-91.
  5. Kaufman AJ, Fleischer AC, Thieme GA, Shah DM, James AE Jr. Separated chorioamnion and elevated chorion: sonographic features and clinical significance. J Ultrasound Med 1985;4(3):119-125
  6. Barak S, Leibovitz Z, Degani S. et al. Extensive hemor- rhagic chorion-amnion separation after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22(1): 1283-1288.
  7. Quintero RA, Kontopoulos EV, Chmait R, Bornick PW, Allen M. Management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in pregnancies with iatrogenic detachment of membranes following therapeutic amniocentesis and the role of in- terim amniopatch. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26(6):628-633.