Journals / Fe Dergi / 2011 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Gender sensitive budgeting: A review

Toplumsal cinsiyete duyarlı bütçeleme (Tcdb) yazınına kuşbakışı

Journal
Fe Dergi
Pages
85–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

GSB initiatives seek to create enabling mainstreaming the gender perspective into all stages of the current budget cycle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gender sensitive budgeting (GSB) literature has been improved in two areas which are in interaction and relation with each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:GSB initiatives are the studies that aim to incorporate a gender perspective into the preparation, adoption, implementation and control stages of all budgetary processes in a range of countries in recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:GSB initiatives seek to create enabling mainstreaming the gender perspective into all stages of the current budget cycle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Gender sensitive budgeting (GSB) literature has been improved in two areas which are in interaction and relation with each other. One of them is the analysis of the state budget or the local government budget from a gender perspective. This literature, in the light of feminist political economics criticizes gender blind mainstream or heterodox economy approaches on budgeting. In this context, different concepts and methods have been developed for examining the impacts of budget policies on women/girls and gender relations. The other main area is focusing on applied and political negotiation aspects of budgeting. GSB initiatives are the studies that aim to incorporate a gender perspective into the preparation, adoption, implementation and control stages of all budgetary processes in a range of countries in recent years. They are not aiming to allocate a separate budget for women and girls. GSB initiatives seek to create enabling mainstreaming the gender perspective into all stages of the current budget cycle.

Özet

TCDB yazını, etkileşim ve ilişki içinde iki ana hatta gelişmektedir. Biri, toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifinden devlet bütçesi veya yerel yönetim bütçelerinin analizine dönük çalışmalardır. Bu çalışmalar, bütçe konusunda anaakım yaklaşımların ve hatta diğer heterodoks yaklaşımların eleştirel analizlerine odaklanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda bütçe politikalarının kadın/kız çocukları ve toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkileri üzerine etkilerini değerlendirmek için farklı kavramlar ve metotlar geliştirilmektedir.Diğer hat ise bütçenin uygulamalı ve politik müzakere boyutlarına odaklanmaktadır. TCDB inisiyatifleri bir dizi ülkede yakın yıllarda toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifin bütçe sürecinin hazırlanması, kanunlaşması, uygulanması ve denetimi aşamalarına dâhil edilmesine dönük çalışmalardır. TCDB inisiyatifleri cari bütçe sürecinin tüm aşamalarında toplumsal cinsiyetin anaakımlaştırılmasını dönük çaba içindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜLBÜL, M. Ş. (2011). Gender sensitive budgeting: A review. Fe Dergi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 85–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/192538

References (9)

  1. Antonopoulos, Rania, (2008) “The Unpaid Care Work-Paid Work Connection,” Working Paper No. 541, New York: The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Bakker, Isabellla, (2002), “Fiscal Policy, Accountability and Voice: The Example of Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives,” Occasional Paper, Background paper for HDR 2002. Erişim adresi: http://hdr.undp.org/docs/publications/background_papers/2002/Bakker_2002.pdf
  2. Barnett, Kathleen and Caren Grown, (2004), Gender Impacts of Government Revenue Collection: The Case of Taxation, Commonwealth Economic Paper Series, London: Commonwealth Secretariat. Batandynowicz, Katarzyna and Panfil Urszula Opacka, (2005), Gdansk Gender Budget Initiative, translation. Adam Jagusiak, Report, The Network of East-West Women (NEWW), Polska. Bellamy, Kate, Fran Bennett and Jane Millar, Who Benefits? A gender analysis of the UK benefits and tax credits system. (London: Fawcett Society, 2006)
  3. Blöndal, Jon R.,“Budget Reform in OECD Member Countries: Common Trends,” OECD Journal on Budgeting, (2003), 2(4): 7-25.
  4. Budlender, Debbie, (2001),
  5. Review of gender budget initiatives, Community Agency for Social Enquiry. Erişim adresi: http://www.internationalbudget.org/resources/library/GenderBudget.pdf
  6. Budlender, Debbie and Rhonda Sharp with K. Allen, How to do a gender-sensitive budget analysis: Contemporary research and practice, Commonwealth Secretariat, AusAID, (1998).
  7. Byanyima, W., J. Wehner, (2004), Parliament, the Budget and Gender, Handbook for Parliamentarians. Çağatay, Nilüfer, “Engendering Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies,” October 1998,
  8. UNDP. Çağatay, Nilüfer, “Gender Budgets and Beyond: Feminist Fiscal Policy in the Context of Globalization,” Gender and Development, Vol. 11, No. 1, (2003):15-24. Canadian Center For Policy Alternatives (CCPA),“Gender Budget Initiatives Why They Matter in Canada,” by Isabellla Bakker in cooperation with the Gender Budget Analysis Committee of the Alternative Federal Budget, Alternative Federal Budget 2006, technical paper 1, Erişim adresi: http://www.westcoastleaf.org/userfiles/file/Gender %20Budget%20Initiatives,%20I_%20Bakker.pdf Chakraborty, Lekha S, “Public Investment and Unpaid Work in India: Selective Evidence from Time-Use Data,” in Unpaid Work and the Economy: Gender, Time-Use and Poverty in Developing Countries, ed. Rania Antonopoulos and Indira Hirway, (Palgrave Macmillan:2010).
  9. Debski, M., B. Erbe, W. Fröhlich, E. Klatzer, Z. Lapniewska, M. Mayrhofer, M. Neumayr, M. Pichlbauer, A.