Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Sternum Closure Techniques with Sternal Cable and Simple Wire After Open Heart Surgery

Pages
200–203
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Materials and Methods: Overall, 246 (141 male and 105 female) adult patients who underwent sternotomy closure with sternal cable (99) and simple wire (147) after open heart surgery were examined retrospectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Median sternotomy is the most commonly used method for open heart surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Poor sternal healing after median sternotomy can cause a significant increase in morbidity and mortality and prolong hospital stay.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Materials and Methods: Overall, 246 (141 male and 105 female) adult patients who underwent sternotomy closure with sternal cable (99) and simple wire (147) after open heart surgery were examined retrospectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Median sternotomy is the most commonly used method for open heart surgery. Poor sternal healing after median sternotomy can cause a significant increase in morbidity and mortality and prolong hospital stay. Although several techniques are available for sternal closure, it is practically limited, and the most common technique is the simple wire technique. There is insufficient scientific study on the comparison of alternative techniques. The aim of the present study was to compare the follow-up results of the sternotomy closure techniques: sternal cable and simple wire. Materials and Methods: Overall, 246 (141 male and 105 female) adult patients who underwent sternotomy closure with sternal cable (99) and simple wire (147) after open heart surgery were examined retrospectively. Patients' postoperative length of hospitalization, sternal dehiscence, local infection, mediastinitis, and mortality rates were evaluated. Resternotomy requirement due to sternal decomposition and surgical site infections was also evaluated. Statistical comparisons were made in terms of the parameters mentioned above. Results: When the groups were compared in terms of age, gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic renal failure (CRF), and smoking status, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The percentage of the patients' coronary artery bypass grafting+mitral valve replacement (9.09%) was higher (p=0.028) in the sternal cable group than in the simple wire group. The cross-clamp time was longer in the sternal cable group (81.24±31.91) than in the simple wire group (74.08±17.67) (p=0.044). Conclusion: Postoperative complications in the sternal cable group were less frequent but statistically not significant in our study. According to our results, sternal cable is effective and can be used as a good alternative to simple wire.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, R., TEKİN, A. İ. (2018). Comparison of Sternum Closure Techniques with Sternal Cable and Simple Wire After Open Heart Surgery. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 200–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/192522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Tunçay A, Akçalı Y, Özmen R, Gazioğlu Ö, Serhatlıoğlu F. Vitalitec International, The Sternal Closure Device: A novel closure technique for sternal dehiscence. J Clin Exp Invest 2014; 5(4): 534-8. [CrossRef] Okutan H, Yavuz T, Ulusan V, Tenekeci C, Öcal A, İbrişim E, et al. The experience of a new sternal clousure technıque after open heart surgery in elderly patients. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2001; 4: 558. Melly L, Gahl B, Meinkec R, Ruetra F, Matta P, Reuthebucha O, et al. A new cable-tie based sternalclousure device: infection considerations. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17(2): 219-23. [CrossRef] Eğileten ZB, Kahraman D, Eryılmaz, S, Uysalel A, Özyurda, Ü. Prophylactic combination of robicsek method and the figure of 8 in patients with risk factors for sternal complications. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2006; 26(1): 51-5.
  2. Orhan SN, Öyazıcıoğlu HM, Çolak A. A biyomedical study of 4 different sternum clousure techniques under different deformation modes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 25(5): 750-6. [CrossRef] Dieselman JC. Comparison of alternative rigid sternal fixation techniques. MSc. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts; 2011.
  3. Oh YN, Ha KJ, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, et al. Multifilament Cable Wire versus Conventional Wire for Sternal Closure in Patients Undergoing Major Cardiac Surgery. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 48(4): 265-71. [CrossRef] Dunne B, Murphy M, Skiba R, Wang X, Ho K, Larbalestier R, et al. Sternal cables are not superior to traditional sternal wiring for preventing deep sternal wound infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22(5): 594-8. [CrossRef] Grapow M, Melly L, Eckstein F, Reuthebucha O. A new cable-tie based sternal closure system: description of the device, technique of implantation and first clinical evaluation. J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 7: 59. [CrossRef] Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Will A, Kröss R, Brockmann G, Libera P, et al. Sternal reconstruction with titanium plates in complicated sternal dehiscence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34(1): 139-45. [CrossRef] Lazar HL, Salm VT, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S. Prevention and management of sternal wound infection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152(4): 962-72. [CrossRef] Olbrecht VA, Barreiro CJ, Bonde PN, Williams JA, Baumgartner WA, Gott VL et al. Clinical outcomes of noninfectious sternal dehiscence after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(3): 902-7. [CrossRef] Huh J, Bakaeen F, Chu D, Wall MJ