Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Intensive Care Patient Bed Cleanliness by ATP Bioluminescence

Pages
347–350
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that it is important to quantify cleanliness inspection in intermittent periods in the prevention of contamination in intensive care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: One of the most important causes of intensive care infections is cross-contamination, and priority is given to hand hygiene and environmental cleanliness in preventing it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adenosine 5 triphospatebioluminescence (ATP) can measure the content of invisible contamination by measuring microorganism organic content.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that it is important to quantify cleanliness inspection in intermittent periods in the prevention of contamination in intensive care.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: One of the most important causes of intensive care infections is cross-contamination, and priority is given to hand hygiene and environmental cleanliness in preventing it. Adenosine 5 triphospatebioluminescence (ATP) can measure the content of invisible contamination by measuring microorganism organic content. ATP produces results fast. In this study, we aim to evaluate the ATP measurement results retrospectively to observe environmental contamination at a time when infection rates have increased in our clinic. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the results of measurements performed on three different days in December 2017. The measurements were made when all 20 beds in our clinic were occupied. Measurements were made in a region of 5x20 cm on the side of each bed before and after cleaning using ATP Clean Trace (3M Company-USA) device, and the results were recorded in the relative light unit (RLU). Although there are studies that have adopted a surface cleanliness threshold of 100- 500 RLU, in our clinic, we consider the most commonly used 250 RLU for similar surface cleanliness as a threshold value. The threshold value for surface cleaning is accepted to be 250 RLU. If the value is above 250 RLU after cleaning, the cleaning is repeated, and the measurements are made again. Results: During the first measurement, three beds had to be cleaned a second time and during the third measurement, eight beds had to be cleaned a second time. Post-cleaning values were significantly lower than the pre-cleaning days (p<0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: Consistent with the literature, we found that satisfactory cleanliness of the sides of the bed, which we think have been cleaned visually, cannot be sometimes achieved and they required to be cleaned again. We believe that it is important to quantify cleanliness inspection in intermittent periods in the prevention of contamination in intensive care.

🔖

Cite This Article

AR, A. Y., ÖZTÜRK, S., ALAGÖZ, S., AKIN, A. E., AĞALAR, C., TURAN, G. (2019). Evaluation of Intensive Care Patient Bed Cleanliness by ATP Bioluminescence. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4, 347–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/192474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Griffith CJ, Cooper RA, Gilmore J, Davies C, Lewis M. An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. J Hosp Infect 2000
  2. 19–28. [CrossRef ] 2. Amodio E, Dino C. Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing the cleanliness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature (1990-2012). J Infect Public Health 2014
  3. 92–8. 3. Zambrano AA, Jones A, Otero P, Ajenjo MC, Labarca JA. Assessment of hospital Daily cleaning practices using ATP bioluminescence in a developing country. Braz J Infect Dis 2014
  4. 675–7. [CrossRef ] 4. Al-Hamad A, Maxwell S. How clean is clean? Proposed methods for hospital cleaning assessment. J Hosp Infect 2008
  5. 328–34. [CrossRef ] 5. Mitchell BG, Farrington A, Allen M, Gardner A, Lisa Hall, Barnett AG, et.al. Variation in hospital cleaning practice and process in Australian hospitals: A structured mapping exercise. Infection, Disease & Health 2017
  6. 195–202. [CrossRef ] 6. Nante N, Ceriale E, Messina G, Lenzi D, Manzi P. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning:a review. J Prev Med Hyg 2017
  7. E177–E183. 7. Carling PC, Von Beheren S, Kim P, Woods C
  8. Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Intensive care unit enviromental cleaning: an evaluation in sixteen hospital using a novel assessment tool. J Hosp Infect 2008
  9. 39–44. [CrossRef ] 8. Aytaç SA, Mercanoğlu B, Özbaş ZY. Tampon Çözeltide İmmunomanyetik Ayırma ve ATP Biyolüminesans Yöntemler ile Escherichia Coli 0157:H7 Sayımı.Türk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2001
  10. 49–52. 9. Turantaş F. ATP Biyolüminesans Yöntemi ve Gıda Mikrobiyolojisindeki Uygulamaları. Gıda 1996
  11. 331–5. 10. Huang YS, Chen YC, Chen ML, Cheng A, Hung IC, Wang JT, et al. Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center. Am J Infect Control 2015
  12. 882–6. [CrossRef ] 11. Lewis BD, Spencer M, Rossi PJ, Lee CJ, Brown KR, Malinowski M, et. al. Assessment of an innovative antimicrobial surface disinfectant in the operating room environment using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Am J Infect Control 2015
  13. 283–5. [CrossRef ] 12. Richard RD, Bowen TR. What Orthopaedic Operating Room Surfaces Are Contaminated With Bioburden? A Study Using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017
  14. 1819–24. [CrossRef ] 13. Aycicek H, Oguz U, Karci K. Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing methods for the determination of su