Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression for Prediction of Live Weight in Hair Goats

Kıl Keçilerinin Canlı Ağırlık Tahmininde Yapay Sinir Ağları ve Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
21–29
Publication Date
2017-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the analyses results, it’s noted that artificial neural networks method is more successful than multiple linear regression in prediction of body weight in hair goats.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artificial neural networks are artificial intelligence based methods which learns like humans, as humans did from instances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, based on measurements of morphologic traits of 475 Hair goats, the impact of different morphological measures on live weight has been modelled by artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the analyses results, it’s noted that artificial neural networks method is more successful than multiple linear regression in prediction of body weight in hair goats.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi · Yapay sinir ağları · Kıl keçisi

Abstract

Artificial neural networks are artificial intelligence based methods which learns like humans, as humans did from instances. In recent years, artificial neural networks are often preferred in prediction studies of farm animals as like in many different fields as an alternative to regression analyses. In this study, based on measurements of morphologic traits of 475 Hair goats, the impact of different morphological measures on live weight has been modelled by artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression analyses. Comparison of these two models has been done. In the analyses done with the artificial neural networks method three different back propagation algorithms, such as Levenberg-Marquart, Bayesian regularization and Scaled conjugate, have been used. Methods performances have been determined with different criteria as coefficient of determination, mean absolute deviation, root mean square error and mean absolute percentage error. According to the analyses results, it’s noted that artificial neural networks method is more successful than multiple linear regression in prediction of body weight in hair goats.

Özet

Yapay sinir ağları, insanlara benzer şekilde, örnekler üzerinden öğrenen yapay zeka temelli bir yöntemdir. Yapay sinir ağları yöntemi birçok farklı alanda olduğu gibi son yıllarda hayvancılık alanında da özellikle tahmin çalışmalarında regresyon analizine alternatif olarak sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 475 baş Kıl keçisine ilişkin morfolojik özellik ölçümlerinin canlı ağırlık üzerine etkileri yapay sinir ağları ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile modellenmiş ve yöntemler bir karşılaştırmaya tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmada yapay sinir ağları ile gerçekleştirilen analizlerde Levenberg-Marquart, Bayesian regularization and Scaled conjugate olmak üzere üç farklı geri yayılım algoritması kullanılmıştır. Yöntemlerin performansları düzeltilmiş belirleme katsayısı, hata kareler ortalamasının karekökü, ortalama mutlak sapma ve ortalama mutlak yüzde hata istatistikleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, Kıl keçilerinde canlı ağırlık tahmini bakımından yapay sinir ağlarının çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizine göre daha başarılı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKOL, S., AKILLI, A., CEMAL, İ. (2017). Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression for Prediction of Live Weight in Hair Goats. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 21–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/191499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alpar R (2011). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 853p. Atıl A, Akıllı A (2016). Comparison of artificial neural network and K-means for clustering dairy cattle. Int. J. Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics. 2(1): 40-52.
  2. Cavero D, Tölle KT, Buxade C, Krieter J (2006). Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livest. Prod. Sci. 105(1-3): 207-213.
  3. Chen LJ, Cui LY, Xing L, Han LJ (2008). Prediction of the nutrient content in dairy manure using artificial neural network modeling. J. Dairy. Sci. 91: 4822-4829.
  4. Craninx M, Fievez V, Vlaeminck B, De Baets B (2008). Artificial neural network models of the rumen fermentation pattern in dairy cattle. Comput. Electron. Agric. 60: 226-238.
  5. Dong R, Zhao G (2014). The use of artificial neural in vitro rumen methane production using the CNCPS carbohydrate fractions as dietary variables. Livest. Prod. Sci. 162: 159-167.
  6. Görgülü O (2012). Prediction of 305-day milk yield in Brown Swiss cattle using artificial neural networks. South African Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp.280-287.
  7. Grzesiak W, Zaborski D, Sablik P, Żukiewicz A, Dybus A, Szatkowska, I (2010). Detection of cows with insemination problems using selected classification models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp.265-273.
  8. Grzesiak W, Lacroix R, Wójcik J, Blaszczyk P (2003). A comparison of neural network and multiple regression predictions for 305-day lactation yield using partial lactation records. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 307-310.
  9. Hassan, K. J., Samarasinghe, S., Lopez- Benavidest, M. G. 2009. Use of neural networks to detect minor and major pathogens that cause bovine mastitis. J. Dairy. Sci. 92: 1493-1499.
  10. Haykin S (2008). Neural Networks and Learning Machines. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 906p. Hosseinia P, Edrisi M, Edriss MA, Nilforooshan MA (2007). Prediction of second parity milk yield and fat percentage of dairy cows based on first parity information using neural networks system. J. Appl. Sci. 7: 3274-3279.
  11. Kominakis AP, Abas Z, Maltaris I, Rogdakis E (2002) A preliminary study of the application of artificial neural networks to prediction of milk yield in dairy sheep. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 35(1): 35-48.
  12. Krieter J, Stamer E, Junge W (2006). Control charts and neural networks for oestrus detection in dairy cows. Lecture Notes in Informatics, Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft im Wandel-Aufgaben und Herausforderungen