Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

The Use of DNA Barcoding in Entomology

Entomolojide DNA Barkodlama Tekniğinin Kullanımı

Pages
126–134
Publication Date
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore we discussed the advantages and limitations of DNA barcoding and presented DNA barcoding studies in entomology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:DNA barcoding is a taxonomic method that uses a short and standard genomic DNA fragment to discriminate species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An approximately 600-700 base pair (bp) region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene referred as ‘DNA barcode’ is used in insect barcoding studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore we discussed the advantages and limitations of DNA barcoding and presented DNA barcoding studies in entomology.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Entomoloji · DNA barkodlama · COI

Abstract

DNA barcoding is a taxonomic method that uses a short and standard genomic DNA fragment to discriminate species. An approximately 600-700 base pair (bp) region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene referred as ‘DNA barcode’ is used in insect barcoding studies. This short standart DNA sequence is not only a tool for simplifying species identification but also is used for discovery of new species. Furthermore DNA barcoding enables the detection of cryptic species via delimiting species boundaries. Here we reviewed the historical and conceptual perspective of DNA barcoding term, the gene regions used as DNA barcodes and COI gene which is ideal species-identification marker in insects. Furthermore we discussed the advantages and limitations of DNA barcoding and presented DNA barcoding studies in entomology.

Özet

DNA barkodlama, herhangi bir organizmaya ait DNA’nın PCR teknikleri ile çoğaltılacak büyüklükteki kısa ve standart bir fragmanının dizilenmesi ile tanılanmasını sağlayan taksonomik bir yöntem olarak ifade edilebilir. Bu amaçla böceklerle yapılan çalışmalarda ‘DNA barkodu’ olarak bilinen mitokondriyal sitokrom c oksidaz alt ünite I (COI) geninin yaklaşık 600-700 baz çiftine (bç) ait kısmı kullanılmaktadır. Bu kısa standart DNA sekansı türlerin tanılanmasını kolaylaştırmasının yanı sıra yeni türlerin keşfi için de oldukça iyi bir araçtır. Ayrıca DNA barkodlama türlerin sınırlarını belirleyerek kriptik türlerin ayrımına katkı sağlar. Bu derlemede DNA barkodlama teriminin tarihsel ve kavramsal olarak ortaya çıkışı, DNA barkodu olarak kullanılan gen bölgeleri ve böcekler için ideal tür tanımlama markörü olan COI gen bölgesi hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Son olarak DNA barkodlamanın avantajları ve kısıtlamaları irdelenerek entomolojide DNA barkodlama çalışmalarından örnekler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YATKIN, G., GÜZ, N. (2018). The Use of DNA Barcoding in Entomology. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 126–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/191411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahrens D, Monaghan MT, Vogler AP (2007). DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 44: 436-449
  2. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff R, Roberts K, Walter P (2002). The genetic systems of mitochondria and plastids. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th Edn. New York: Garland Science
  3. Amaral AR, Sequeira M, Coelho MM (2007). A first approach to the usefulness of cytochrome c oxidase I barcodes in the identification of closely related delphinid cetacean species. Mar. Freshwater Res. 58: 505-510
  4. Armstrong K, Ball S (2005). DNA barcodes for biosecurity: Invasive species identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 360: 1813-1823
  5. Asahida T, Yamashita Y, Kabayashi T (1997). Identification of consumed stone flounder Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky), from the stomach contents of sand shrimp, Crangon affinis (De Hann) using mitochondrial DNA analysis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 217, 153-163
  6. Ball SL, Armstrong KF (2006). DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 36: 337-350
  7. Beutel RG, Pohl H (2006). Endopterygote systematics– where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)? Systematic Entomology. 31: 202-219
  8. Blaxter M (2003). Counting angels with DNA. Nature. 421: 22-124
  9. Blaxter ML (2004). The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 359: 669-679
  10. Busse HJ, Denner EBM, Lubitz W (1996). Classification and identification of bacteria: current approaches to an old problem. Overview of methods used in bacterial systematics. Journal of Biotechnology. 47: 3-38
  11. Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert P.D.N (2006). Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 20: 413-424
  12. Çakmak I, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2006). Intraguild interactions between the predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp. and Appl. Acarol. 38: 33-46
  13. Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J (2006). Taxonomy: DNA barcodes: recent successes and future prospects. Heredity (Edinb). 97: 254-255
  14. Duman M, Guz N, Sertkaya E (2015). DNA barcoding of sunn pest adult parasitoids using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 59 70-77
  15. Dunshea G (2009). DNA-based diet a