SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands and Suggestions for the Use of Constructed Wetlands in Cold-Climate Regions

Yapay Sulak Alanlarında Atık Su Arıtımı ve Soğuk İklime Sahip Bölgelerde Kullanım Önerileri

Talip ÇAKMAKCI
Üstün ŞAHİN
Fatih KIZILOĞLU
Şefik TÜFENKÇİ
Yasemin KUŞLU
Fatih ERKUŞ
Pages
651–656
Publication Date
2017-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the use of constructed wetlands in cold climate conditions has been reviewed and necessary suggestions reported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the depleting water resources in response to the increasing need for water along with increase in population have led researchers to search new water resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Constructed wetlands are widely used in regions with warm climates, while in cold climate conditions, low temperatures result in decreased treatment efficiency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the use of constructed wetlands in cold climate conditions has been reviewed and necessary suggestions reported.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Soğuk iklim · Yapak sulak alanlar · Atık su

Abstract

In recent years, the depleting water resources in response to the increasing need for water along with increase in population have led researchers to search new water resources. Among these sources, the most spectacular one is the use of polluted waters after treatment. One of the alternative methods for the treatment of wastewaters is constructed wetlands. This treatment mechanism is preferred due to its effectiveness in the removal of pollution and pathogen microorganisms as well as its economic contribution. Constructed wetlands are widely used in regions with warm climates, while in cold climate conditions, low temperatures result in decreased treatment efficiency. In this study, the use of constructed wetlands in cold climate conditions has been reviewed and necessary suggestions reported.

Özet

Son yıllarda, nüfus artışıyla birlikte su ihtiyacındaki artışa karşın azalan su kaynakları, insanoğlunu yeni su kaynakları arayışına yöneltmektedir. Bu kaynaklar arasında da en göze çarpanı çeşitli yollarla kirletilmiş suları arıtarak kullanmaktır. Atık suyun arıtımı için alternatif yöntemlerden biri de yapay sulak alanlardır. Bu arıtım mekanizması ekonomik katkının yanında kirlilik ve patojen mikroorganizma gideriminde de etkili olmasından dolayı tercih edilmektedir. Yapay sulak alanlar ılıman ve sıcak iklime sahip yerleşim yerlerinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Soğuk iklim koşullarında ise özellikle düşük sıcaklık nedeniyle arıtımın verimliliği düşmektedir. Bu çalışmada da soğuk iklim koşullarında kullanımı için yapılması gerekenler incelemiş ve öneriler verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAKCI, T., ŞAHİN, Ü., KIZILOĞLU, F., TÜFENKÇİ, Ş., KUŞLU, Y., ERKUŞ, F. (2017). Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands and Suggestions for the Use of Constructed Wetlands in Cold-Climate Regions. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 651–656. https://ajindex.com/articles/191369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Angın İ, Tunç T, Şahin Ü (2010). Yapay Sulak Alanların Soğuk İklim Şartlarında Kullanılabilirliği. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi (TABAD) 3(2): 59-64.
  2. Anonymous (2013). ORSAM Rapor:78. Orsam Su Araştırmaları Programı. Rapor No:8, Eylül. http://www.orsam.org.tr.pdf. Date of access: 08.11.2016
  3. Bojcevska H, Tonderski K (2007). Impact of loads, season, and plant species on the performance of a tropical constructed wetland polishing effluent from sugar factory stabilization ponds. Ecological Engineering, 29(1): 66-76.
  4. Breen PF (1990). A mass balance method for assessing the potential of artificial wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water Research, 24 (6): 689-697.
  5. Brix H, Arias CA (2005). The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands for on-site treatment of domestic wastewater: New Danish guidelines. Ecological Eng., 25 (5): 491-500.
  6. Bruch I, Fritsche J, Bänninger D, Alewella U, Sendelov M, Hürlimann H, Hasselbach R, Alewell C (2011). Improving the treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands with zeolite-containing filter sands. Bioresource Technology 102 (2): 937-941.
  7. Caselles-Osorio A, Vega H, Lancheros JC, Casierra-Martínez HA, Mosquera JE (2017). Horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland removal efficiency using Cyperus articulatus L. Ecological Engineering, 99: 479-485.
  8. Cooper PF, Boon AC (1987). The use of Phragmites for wastewater treatment by the root zone method: the UK approach. In: Reddy, K.R., Smith, W.H. (Eds.), Aquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery. Magnolia Publishing, Orlando, FL, pp. 153–174.
  9. Cooper P (2005). The performance of vertical flow constructed wetland systems with special reference to the significance of oxygen transfer and hydraulic loading rates. Water Science & Technology, 51 (9): 81–90.
  10. Dan TH, Quang LN, Chiem NH, Brix H (2011). Treatment of high-strength wastewater in tropical constructed wetlands planted with Sesbania sesban: horizontal subsurface flow versus vertical downflow. Ecological Engineering, 37 (5): 711-720. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1999). Free Water Surface Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: A technology Assessment. Washington. D. C. Garcia J, Rousseau DP, Morato J, Lesage ELS, Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2010). Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40 (7): 561-661.
  11. Gersberg RM, Elkins BV, Lyon SR, Goldman CR (1986). Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wet