SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Different Methods Used For Determination of Percent Crop Residue Cover

Bitki Yüzey Artığı Kaplama Yüzdesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Farklı Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması

İlknur DURSUN
Ergin DURSUN
Abdullah BEYAZ
Pages
550–557
Publication Date
2017-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Variance analysis showed that the difference between the results obtained from the line transect method and ImageJ is statistically insignificant while the differences between the results obtained from these methods and the other methods are significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research was to determine the percent crop residue cover using meter stick method, line transect method, image processing software ImageJ and Labview Vision Assistant Module in the field condition covered with wheat surface residues and to compare results obtained from these measuring methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of study, the mean percent crop residue cover using meter stick method, line transect method, image processing software ImageJ and Labview Vision Assistant Module were determined as 44.13%, 50.72%, 56.56% and 64.49%, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Variance analysis showed that the difference between the results obtained from the line transect method and ImageJ is statistically insignificant while the differences between the results obtained from these methods and the other methods are significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bitki yüzey artığı kaplama yüzdesi · kesişen hat yöntemi · ImageJ

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the percent crop residue cover using meter stick method, line transect method, image processing software ImageJ and Labview Vision Assistant Module in the field condition covered with wheat surface residues and to compare results obtained from these measuring methods. In order to determine the percent crop residue cover using ImageJ image processing software and Labview Vision Assistant Module, photographs were taken with a digital camera of the intelligent mobile phone from various places of a field covered with wheat surface residues. At the end of study, the mean percent crop residue cover using meter stick method, line transect method, image processing software ImageJ and Labview Vision Assistant Module were determined as 44.13%, 50.72%, 56.56% and 64.49%, respectively. Variance analysis showed that the difference between the results obtained from the line transect method and ImageJ is statistically insignificant while the differences between the results obtained from these methods and the other methods are significant.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; buğdayın yüzey artıklarıyla kaplı tarla koşulunda cetvel yöntemi, kesişen hat yöntemi, ImageJ görüntü işleme programı ve Labview Vision Assistant Modülüyle yüzey artığı kaplama yüzdesinin belirlenmesi ve elde edilen sonuçların karşılaştırılmasıdır. ImageJ görüntü işleme programı ve Labview Vision Assistant Modülüyle yüzey artığı kaplama yüzdesinin belirlenmesi için, buğday yüzey artıklarıyla kaplı bir tarlanın çeşitli yerlerinden akıllı cep telefonunun dijital kamerasıyla fotoğraflar çekilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda; cetvel, kesişen hat, ImageJ görüntü işleme programı ve Labview Vision Assistant Modülü kullanılarak ortalama bitki yüzey artığı kaplama yüzdeleri sırasıyla % 44.13, % 50.72, % 56.56 ve % 64.49 olarak belirlenmiştir. Yapılan varyans analizi; kesişen hat ve ImageJ görüntü işleme yöntemlerinden bulunan sonuçlar arasındaki farklılığın istatistiksel olarak önemsiz, bu yöntemlerle diğer yöntemlerden elde edilen sonuçlar arasındaki farklılıkların ise önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, İ., DURSUN, E., BEYAZ, A. (2017). Comparison of Different Methods Used For Determination of Percent Crop Residue Cover. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 550–557. https://ajindex.com/articles/191360

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aase JK, Tanaka DL (1991). Reflectance from four wheat residues cover densities as influenced by three soil backgrounds. Agronomy Journal, 83: 753-757.
  2. Al-Kaisi M, Hanna M (2009). Residue Management & Cultural Practices. Resources Conservation Practices, PM 1901a,
  3. University Extension, Iowa State University, Iowa. Anonim (2016). Labview Nedir? http://mekatronikdersi.blogspot.com.tr/2014/10/ labview-nedir.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 07 Şubat, 2016).
  4. Anonymous (2015). Estimating Crop Residue Cover for Soil Erosion Control. Soil Factsheet, Order No: 641.220-1, revised December 2015, Created September 2000,
  5. British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Abbotsford, British Columbia. Anonymous (2016a). Reduce Need. Agricultural Irrigation Management: Reduce the Need for Irrigation: Maintain Crop Residue, Reduce Tillage. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, UNL Water, http://water.unl.edu/cropswater/reduceneed. (Erişim Tarihi: 08 Nisan, 2016). Anonymous (2016b). Crop Residue Estimator. FieldTRAKS Solutions 2016, http://fieldtraks.ca/prod_cropresidue.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 04 Ağustos, 2016).
  6. Bannari A, Pacheco A, Staenz K, McNairn H, Omari K (2006). Estimating and mapping crop residues cover on agricultural lands using hyperspectral and IKONOS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104: 447-459.
  7. Corak SJ, Kaspar TC, Meek DW (1993). Evaluating methods for measuring residue cover. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 48 (1): 70-74.
  8. Daughtry CST, McMurtey III JE, Kim MS, Chappelle EW (1997). Estimating crop residue cover by blue fluorescence imaging. Remote Sensing of Environment, 60: 14-21.
  9. Daughtry CST (2001). Estimating Crop Residue Cover by Remote Sensing. Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab. USDA-BARC-ARS. Daughtry CST, Doraiswamy PC, Hunt Jr ER, Stern AJ, McMurtrey III JE, Prueger JH (2006). Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity. Soil & Tillage Research, 91 (2006): 101-108.
  10. Dickey EC., Harlan, PW, Vokal D (1981). Crop residue management for water erosion control. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, DigitalCommons @ University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Biological Systems Engineering: Papers and Publications, G18-544, 4-1-1981,
  11. Nebraska. Dickey EC, Havlin J (1985). Estimating Crop Residue Using Residue to Help Control Wind and Water Erosion. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Biological Systems Engineering, Lincoln, NE Leaft No: 3, 1-1-1985,
  12. Nebraska. Dickey EC, Shelton DP, Jasa PJ (1986). Residue Management for Soil Erosion Control. University of Nebraska-Lincoln,