Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

The morbidly adherent placenta: when and what association of signs can improve MRI diagnosis? Our experience

Pages
180–186
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

VALENTİNİ, A. L., NİNİVAGGİ, V., NİNİVAGGİ, V., MİCCÒ, M., GİULİANİ, M., RUSSO, L., MARİNİ, M. G., TİNTONİ, M., CAVALİERE, A. F., BONOMO, L. (2017). The morbidly adherent placenta: when and what association of signs can improve MRI diagnosis? Our experience. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 180–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/190516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Lim BH, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM. The morbidly adherent placenta, a continuing diagnostic and management challenge. BJOG 2015
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM, et al. Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. Radiographics 2009
  3. 1371–1391. [CrossRef] 3. Derman AY, Nikac V, Haberman S, Zelenko N, Opsha O, Flyer M. MRI of placenta accreta: a new imaging perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
  4. 1514–1521. [CrossRef] 4. Leyendecker JR, DuBose M, Hosseinzadeh K, et al. MRI of pregnancy-related issues: abnormal placentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
  5. 311–320. [CrossRef] 5. Algebally AM, Yousef RR, Badr SS, Al Obeidly A, Szmigielski W, Al Ibrahim AA. The value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnostics and prediction of morbidity in cases of placenta previa with abnormal placentation. Pol J Radiol 2014
  6. 409–716. [CrossRef] 6. Kayem G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Sentilhes L, et al. PACCRETA: clinical situations at high risk of placenta ACCRETA/percreta: impact of diagnostic methods and management on maternal morbidity. ACTA Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013
  7. 476–482. [CrossRef] 7. D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Bruno CH, Manzoli L, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014
  8. 8–16. [CrossRef] 8. Ueno Y, Kitajima K, Kawakami F, et al. Novel MRI finding for diagnosis of invasive placenta praevia: evaluation of findings for 65 patients using clinical and histopathological correlations. Eur Radiol 2014
  9. 881–888. [CrossRef] 9. Alamo L, Anaye A, Rey J, et al. Detection of suspected placental invasion by MRI: do the results depend on observer’ experience? Eur J Radiol 2013
  10. e51–57. [CrossRef] 10. Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2008
  11. 1905–1916. [CrossRef] 11. Lurie S, Raz N, Boaz M, et al. Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014
  12. 43– 47. [CrossRef] 12. Coviello EM, Grantz KL, Huang CC, Kelly TE, Landy HJ. Risk factors for retained placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015
  13. e1–e11. [CrossRef] 13. Masselli G, Gualdi G. MR imaging of the placenta: what a radiologist should know. Abdom Imaging 2013
  14. 573–587. [CrossRef] 14. Lax A, Prince MR, Menn