Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

Epidemiology of Trauma with Analysis of 138.352 Patients: Trends of a Single Center

Pages
181–185
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Social measures for trauma mechanisms leading to more deaths and trainings of people based on age-gender, where trauma mechanisms are more common, will reduce the morbidity and mortality rates caused by trauma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The analysis of the epidemiology of trauma is important to determine the needs of hospitals and develop treatment strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between 2009 and 2015, trauma patients admitted to the hospital emergency department were retrospectively screened according to the ICD-10 system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Social measures for trauma mechanisms leading to more deaths and trainings of people based on age-gender, where trauma mechanisms are more common, will reduce the morbidity and mortality rates caused by trauma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The analysis of the epidemiology of trauma is important to determine the needs of hospitals and develop treatment strategies. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of trauma in a hospital sample that accepts a large number of trauma patients. Methods: Between 2009 and 2015, trauma patients admitted to the hospital emergency department were retrospectively screened according to the ICD-10 system. The trauma mechanisms were grouped as falls on the level/from height, injury by object, pedestrian/cyclist injuries, vehicle collisions, penetrating stab injuries, gunshot wounds, and assault. Age, gender distribution of patients, and death information were recorded. In the analysis of the data, t-test and chi-square test were used for the comparison with descriptive statistics. P<0.05 was accepted as significant. Results: In the study, 138.352 patients (mean age 25.7±19.8 years, age range 0–113, male/female ratio: 1.81) were analyzed. Falls on the level/from height was the most prominent cause of trauma (n=76.636, 55.4%). Male gender was predominant in all injury mechanisms and in all age group except over 60 years (p<0.001). The most common injury mechanisms that resulted in death were falls on the level/from height, vehicle collision, and pedestrian/cyclist injury with mortality rates of 0.09, 0.08, and 0.07, respectively (p<0.001). Discussion and Conclusion: Our study found that in emergency service trauma applications, fall-crash and traffic accidents were the two most common mechanisms. The frequency of trauma mechanisms should be considered in the emergency service continuous training programs. Social measures for trauma mechanisms leading to more deaths and trainings of people based on age-gender, where trauma mechanisms are more common, will reduce the morbidity and mortality rates caused by trauma.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKEŞİN, K., BAŞAK, F., ŞİŞİK, A., ÇALIŞKAN, Y. K. (2019). Epidemiology of Trauma with Analysis of 138.352 Patients: Trends of a Single Center. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 181–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/190432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Fiona E, Lecky, Bouamra O, Woodfordn M, Alexandrescu R, O’Brien SJ. Damage Control Management in the Polytrauma Patient. In: Hans-Christoph Pape, Andrew Peitzman, C. William Schwab, Peter V. Giannoudis, editors. Epidemiology of Polytrauma. Springer; 2010. p. 13–24
  2. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health 2000;90:523–6. [CrossRef ] 3. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1498–504. [CrossRef ] 4. James A. Chambers MD, MPH & TM. Epidemiology of Trauma. In: Alexander L. Eastman, David H. Rosenbaum, Erwin R. Thal, editors. Parkland Trauma Handbook. 3th edition. Dallas: 2009. p. 1–4
  3. Gross CP, Anderson GF, Powe NR. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1881–7. [CrossRef ] 6. Lagarde E. Road traffic injury is an escalating burden in Africa and deserves proportionate research efforts. PLoS Med 2007;4:e170. [CrossRef ] 7. Hofman K, Primack A, Keusch G, Hrynkow S. Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries. Am J Public Health 2005;95:13–7. [CrossRef ] 8. Committee on injury scaling, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale. 1990 Revision. Update 98. Des Plaines, Illinois: 1990
  4. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974;14:187–96
  5. Liener UC, Rapp U, Lampl L, Helm M, Richter G, Gaus M, et al. Incidence of severe injuries. Results of a population-based analysis. [Article in German] Unfallchirurg 2004;107:483–90
  6. Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G, Michelutto V, Nardi G, Burba I, Francescutti C; Regional Study-Group on Major Injury. Epidemiology of major injury in the population of Friuli Venezia Giulia-Italy. Injury 2004;35:391–400. [CrossRef ] 12. Peden M, McGee K, Sharma G. The Injury Chart Book: a Graphical Overview of the Global Burden of Injuries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002
  7. Moshiro C, Heuch I, Astrøm AN, Setel P, Hemed Y, Kvåle G. Injury morbidity in an urban and a rural area in Tanzania: an epidemiological survey. BMC Public Health 2005;5:11. [CrossRef ] 14. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003
  8. Bulut M, Koksal O, Korkmaz