Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Influence of the different anteromedial portal on femoral tunnel orientation during anatomic ACL reconstruction

Pages
227–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is important toselect accurate AM portal positioning, and possibly using an AAM portal by measuring an accurate position when drilling a femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral tunnel orientation, drilledthrough the accessory anteromedial (AAM) portal or the high AM portal in anatomic anterior cruciateligament (ACL) reconstruction.Methods: In 16 cadaver knees, using o'clock method, centers of the ACL femoral footprint were drilledwith an 8-mm reamer via an AAM portal (eight knees) or a high AM portal (eight knees).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three-dimensional (3D) models were constructed toidentify the femoral tunnel orientation and to create femoral tunnel virtual cylinders for measuringtunnel angles and length.Results: In two of the 16 specimens, we observed a posterior femoral cortex blowout (PFCB) whendrilling through a high AM portal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is important toselect accurate AM portal positioning, and possibly using an AAM portal by measuring an accurate position when drilling a femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:16 specimens
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral tunnel orientation, drilledthrough the accessory anteromedial (AAM) portal or the high AM portal in anatomic anterior cruciateligament (ACL) reconstruction.Methods: In 16 cadaver knees, using o'clock method, centers of the ACL femoral footprint were drilledwith an 8-mm reamer via an AAM portal (eight knees) or a high AM portal (eight knees). Computedtomography (CT) scans were taken of each knee. Three-dimensional (3D) models were constructed toidentify the femoral tunnel orientation and to create femoral tunnel virtual cylinders for measuringtunnel angles and length.Results: In two of the 16 specimens, we observed a posterior femoral cortex blowout (PFCB) whendrilling through a high AM portal. When drilled through the high AM portal, the femoral tunnel lengthwas signiŞcantly shorter than when using an AAM portal (30.3 ± 3.8 mm and 38.2 ± 3.1 mm, p < 0.001).The femoral tunnel length was signiŞcantly shorter in the group with PFCB compared to the group withno PFCB (25.9± 0.6 mm and 35.5 ± 4.5 mm, p ¼ 0.011). The axial obliquity of the high AM portal wassigniŞcantly higher than that of the AAM portal (52.2 ± 5.9and 43.0± 2.3, p¼ 0.003).Conclusions: In anatomic ACL reconstruction, a mal-positioned AM portal can cause abnormal tunnelorientation, which may lead to mechanical failure during ACL reconstruction. Therefore, it is important toselect accurate AM portal positioning, and possibly using an AAM portal by measuring an accurate position when drilling a femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction.

🔖

Cite This Article

MOON, D., JO, H., LEE, D., KANG, D., BYUN, J., HWANG, S. (2026). Influence of the different anteromedial portal on femoral tunnel orientation during anatomic ACL reconstruction. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 227–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/189804

References (13)

  1. Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J, Fu FH. Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2013;37(2): 239e246. 2. van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Vyas SM, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu FH. Systematic review on cadaveric studies of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(Suppl 1):S101eS108
  2. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2004;86(4):515e520
  3. Getelman MH, Friedman MJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7(3):189e198
  4. Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(325):100e109
  5. Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams 3rd RJ. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(3):342e350
  6. Xu Y, Ao Y, Wang J, Yu J, Cui G. Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(7):923e932
  7. Giron F, Cuomo P, Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA, Aglietti P. Double-bundle “anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):7e13
  8. Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach Jr BR. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(7):1235e1242
  9. Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):113e115
  10. Lubowitz JH. Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(1):95e101
  11. Chhabra A, Diduch DR, Blessey PB, Miller MD. Recreating an acceptable angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using external landmarks. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):328e330
  12. Ilahi OA, Ventura NJ, Qadeer AA. Femoral tunnel length: accessory anteromedial portal drilling versus transtibial drilling. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4): 486e491
  13. Takeda Y