Nointra or postoperative complications was observed.CONCLUSION: Direct or Veress needle entry methods were both safe to create pneumoperitoneumwith similar postoperative gastrointestinal functions except for earlier first flatulence in Veress needlegroup while direct trocar entry was found to be associated with favorable postoperative blood count andshorter duration to obtain enough intraperitoneal pressure.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two different laparoscopic entry methods on postoperative gastrointestinal functions.STUDY DESIGN: A total of 108 women who underwent gynecological operation via laparoscopic approach with different indications were randomly assigned to 2 groups: In Group 1 pneumoperiteneumwas achieved by direct trocar entry (n=72), while in group 2, Veress needle was used.RESULTS: Correlation analyses showed a significant association between the technique for abdominalentry and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit concentrations, time to maximal intraabdominalpressure and the body mass index.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Comparison of groups with different laparoscopic entry techniquesshowed a significant difference between groups in terms of postoperative hemoglobin and hematocritconcentrations, time to obtain maximal intraabdominal pressure and time to first flatulence (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nointra or postoperative complications was observed.CONCLUSION: Direct or Veress needle entry methods were both safe to create pneumoperitoneumwith similar postoperative gastrointestinal functions except for earlier first flatulence in Veress needlegroup while direct trocar entry was found to be associated with favorable postoperative blood count andshorter duration to obtain enough intraperitoneal pressure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two different laparoscopic entry methods on postoperative gastrointestinal functions.STUDY DESIGN: A total of 108 women who underwent gynecological operation via laparoscopic approach with different indications were randomly assigned to 2 groups: In Group 1 pneumoperiteneumwas achieved by direct trocar entry (n=72), while in group 2, Veress needle was used.RESULTS: Correlation analyses showed a significant association between the technique for abdominalentry and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit concentrations, time to maximal intraabdominalpressure and the body mass index. Comparison of groups with different laparoscopic entry techniquesshowed a significant difference between groups in terms of postoperative hemoglobin and hematocritconcentrations, time to obtain maximal intraabdominal pressure and time to first flatulence (p<0.05). Nointra or postoperative complications was observed.CONCLUSION: Direct or Veress needle entry methods were both safe to create pneumoperitoneumwith similar postoperative gastrointestinal functions except for earlier first flatulence in Veress needlegroup while direct trocar entry was found to be associated with favorable postoperative blood count andshorter duration to obtain enough intraperitoneal pressure.
🔖
Cite This Article
ŞENOL, T., POLAT, M., ÖZKAYA, E., ŞANVERDİ, İ., KONUKÇU, B., KARATEKE, A. (2016). Comparison Effect of Direct Trocar and Veress Needle Entry Techniques on Gut Functions after Laparoscopic Procedures: Randomized Clinical Trial. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 156–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/189761
Schaeff B, Paolucci V, Henze A, Encke A. Electron mi- croscopical changes to pneumoperitoneum after laparo- scopic operations. Surg Endosc 1998;12:O36 Volz J, Koster S, Spacek Z, Paweletz N. Characteristic al- terations of the peritoneum after carbon dioxide pneu- moperitoneum. Surg Endosc 1999;13(6):611-614.
Heel KA, Hall JC. Peritoneal defenses and peritoneumas- sociated lymphoid tissue. Br J Surg 1996;83(8):1031- 1036. Hajri A, Mutter D, Wack S, Bastien C, Gury JF, Marescaux J et al. Dual effect of laparoscopy on cell-me- diated immunity. Eur Surg Res 2000;32(5):261-266.
West MA, Baker J, Bellingham J. Kinetics of decreased LPS-stimulated cytokine release by macrophages exposed to CO2. J Surg Res 1996;63(1):269-274.
McDermott JP, Regan MC, Page R, Stokes MA, Barry K, Moriarty DC et al. Cardiorespiratory effects of la- paroscopy with and without gas insufflation. Arch Surg 1995;130(9):984-988.
Neuberger TJ, Andrus CH, Wittgen CM, Wade TP, Kaminski DL. Prospective comparison of helium versus carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43(1):38-41. Ahmad G. O'Flynn H. Duffy JM. Phillips K. Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2. Puttick MI, Scott-Coombes DM, Dye J, Nduka CC, Menzies- Gow NM, MansŞeld AO et al. Comparison of immunologic and physiologic effects of CO2pneumoperi- toneum at room and body temperatures. Surg Endosc 1999;13(6):572-575.
Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2013;39(7):1190-1206.
Kotidis E, Papavramidis T, Ioannidis K, Koliakos G, Lazou T, et al. Can chronic intra-abdominal hypertension cause oxidative stress to the abdominal wall muscles? An experimental study. J Surg Res 2012;176(1):102-107.
Gong G, Wang P, Ding W, Zhao Y, Li J. The role of oxy- gen-free radical in the apoptosis of enterocytes and bacte- rial translocation in abdominal compartment syndrome. Free Radic Res 2009;43(5):470-477. Ihtiyar E. Yasar NF. Erkasap N. Koken T. Tosun M. et al. Effects of doxycycline on renal ischemia reperfusion in- jury induced by abdominal compartment syndrome. J Surg Res 2011;167(1):113-120.
Duzgun AP, Gulgez B, Ozmutlu A, Ertorul D, Bugdayci G, et al. The relationship between intestinal hypoperfusion and serum d-lactate levels during experimental