Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5

Vertebral body bone mineral density in patients with lumbar spondylolysis: a quantitative CT study

Pages
385–389
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that patients with spondylolysis had significantly lower mean vertebral body BMD compared with controls

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spondylolysis is known to be a part of a disease process, which describes a defect in the pars interarticularis of vertebra.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Forty symptomatic patients with lumbar spondylolysis aged 18-52 years and 40 matched controls of same sex and approximate age (±2 years) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that patients with spondylolysis had significantly lower mean vertebral body BMD compared with controls
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Spondylolysis is known to be a part of a disease process, which describes a defect in the pars interarticularis of vertebra. We aimed to use quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to measure vertebral body bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with lumbar spondylolysis and compare it with readings in controls. METHODS Forty symptomatic patients with lumbar spondylolysis aged 18-52 years and 40 matched controls of same sex and approximate age (±2 years) were included in the study. Measurements of BMD were performed by QCT analysis for each vertebral body from T12 to L5 and mean BMD was calculated for each case. RESULTS Of 40 patients, 22 (55%) demonstrated L5 spondylolysis, 14 (35%) L4 spondylolysis, three (7.5%) L3 spondylolysis, and one (2.5%) L2 spondylolysis. Spondylolisthesis was found in 29 patients (73%). Patients with spondylolisthesis were significantly older than patients without spondylolisthesis (42±6.9 vs. 37.2±5.4, P = 0.024). Mean BMD value of the patient group was significantly lower than that of the controls (105±24 mg/cm³ vs. 118.7±25.6 mg/cm³, P = 0.015). Subgroup analysis of 19 patients and 19 controls under the age of 40 revealed that the mean BMD value of the patients was significantly lower than that of the controls in the younger age group as well (108.7±23.5 mg/cm³ vs. 130±25.8 mg/cm³, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that patients with spondylolysis had significantly lower mean vertebral body BMD compared with controls

🔖

Cite This Article

GEZER, N. S., BALCI, A., KALEMCİ, O., KÖREMEZLİ, N., AKIN, I. B., UR, K. (2017). Vertebral body bone mineral density in patients with lumbar spondylolysis: a quantitative CT study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5, 385–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/189635

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Tallarico RA, Madom IA, Palumbo MA. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc 2008; 16:32-38
  2. Leone A, Cerase A, Aulisa AG, Tamburrelli F. Imaging of lumbar spondylolysis. Radiologist 2001; 8:73-86
  3. Taillard WF. Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1976; 117:30-39
  4. Wiltse LL, Rothman SLG, Milanowska K, Hanley EN, Bradford DS. Lumbar and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. In: Weinstein JN, Wiesel SW, eds. The lumbar spine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990. p. 471-499
  5. He LC, Wang YX, Gong JS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly Chinese men and women. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:441-448
  6. Saraste H. Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Pediatric Orthop 1987; 7:631-638
  7. Logroscino G, Mazza O, Aulisa G, Pitta L, Pola E, Aulisa L. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the pediatric and adolescent population. Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17:644-655
  8. Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 2008; 11:123-162
  9. Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography-based advanced techniques in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2015 ISCD official positions-Part III. J Clin Densitom 2015; 18:393-407
  10. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJ, 3rd. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 1981; 67:328-335
  11. Mueller DK, Kutscherenko A, Bartel H, Vlassenbroek A, Ourednicek P, Erckenbrecht J. Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation. Eur J Radiol 2011; 79:375-381
  12. Vogt MT, Rubin DA, San Valentin R, Palermo L, Kang JD, Donaldson WF, 3rd, et al. Degenerative lumbar listhesis and bone mineral density in elderly women. The study of osteoporotic fractures. Spine 1999; 24:2536-2541
  13. Harada A, Okuizumi H, Miyagi N, Genda E. Correlation between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 1998; 23:857-861
  14. Knight SM, Ring EF, Bhalla AK. Bone mineral density and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51:1025-1026
  15. Nuti R, Righi G, Martini G, Turchetti V, Lepore C, Doretti V. Diagn