Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Time-dependent model for earthquake occurrence and effects of design spectra on structural performance: a case study from the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey

Pages
215–234
Publication Date
2021-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We have determined that the earthquake building parameters differ from each other which indicates the significance of site-specific seismicity characteristics on the building performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We have investigated the time-dependent seismicity model of the earthquake occurrence on a regional basis through the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ).
📊
Key Findings & Data:To that end, the studied region has been subdivided into 7 seismogenic zones considering the seismotectonic criteria, and then regional time and magnitude predictable (RTIMAP) model has been performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have determined that the earthquake building parameters differ from each other which indicates the significance of site-specific seismicity characteristics on the building performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:North Anatolian Fault Zone · seismic hazard · earthquake prediction

Abstract

We have investigated the time-dependent seismicity model of the earthquake occurrence on a regional basis through the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). To that end, the studied region has been subdivided into 7 seismogenic zones considering the seismotectonic criteria, and then regional time and magnitude predictable (RTIMAP) model has been performed. Intervened times and magnitudes of main shocks produced in each zone have predictive properties defined by the RTIMAP. The probabilities of the next main shocks in 5 decades and the magnitudes of the next events have been estimated using the formation time and magnitude of the past events in the zones. In the second step of the study, we have considered 17 settlements located on the NAFZ to perform point-based site-specific seismic hazard analyses and to determine the design spectra and earthquake parameters using updated Turkish Earthquake Hazard Map. Eigen value and static adaptive pushover analyses have been applied for the sample reinforced concrete building using the design spectra obtained from each settlement. This sample building has been modelled with the same structural characteristics (i.e. material strength, column and beams, applied loads, etc.) for all of the settlements. We have determined that the earthquake building parameters differ from each other which indicates the significance of site-specific seismicity characteristics on the building performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISİK, E., EKİNCİ, Y. L., SAYİL, N., BUYUKSARAC, A., AYDİN, M. C. (2021). Time-dependent model for earthquake occurrence and effects of design spectra on structural performance: a case study from the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 215–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/189273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Al-Tarazi E, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P1, DOI 10.1193/1.2430543 AMBRASEYS NN, 1970,
  2. TECTONOPHYSICS, V9, P143, DOI 10.1016/0040-1951(70)90014-4 [Anonymous], 1998, TURK SEISM DES COD. Antoniou S, 2004, J EARTHQ ENG, V8, P643, DOI 10.1142/S136324690400150X Antoniou S, 2004, J EARTHQ ENG, V8, P497, DOI 10.1142/S1363246904001511 Antoniou S, 2003, USER MANUAL. Barka A, 1992, ANN TECTON, V6, P64. Bayliss TJ, 2007, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V7, P345, DOI 10.5194/nhess-7-345-2007 Bekler T, 2019, J APPL GEOPHYS, V163, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.02.009 Bektas O, 2007, TURK J EARTH SCI, V16, P1 Borcherdt RD, 2004, PHARM PROFILING DRUG, P1 Bozkurt E, 2001, GEODIN ACTA, V14, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0985-3111(01)01066-X Burton PW, 2004,
  3. TECTONOPHYSICS, V390, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.03.020 Buyuksarac A, 2013, J SEISMOL, V17, P425, DOI 10.1007/s10950-012-9328-1 Caputo M, 1974, NATO ADV STUDY I SER, V3 Casarotti C, 2007, B EARTHQ ENG, V5, P377, DOI 10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8 Chingtham P, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P1783, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2031-0 CORNELL CA, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P1583 Corral A, 2006,
  4. TECTONOPHYSICS, V424, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.035 DEWEY JW, 1976, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V66, P843 Ekinci YL, 2021, GEOPHYS J INT, V224, P923, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggaa492 Ekinci YL, 2020, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V177, P3243, DOI 10.1007/s00024-020-02432-0 Ferracuti B, 2009, ENG STRUCT, V31, P1789, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.035 Hamling IJ, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V119, P6080, DOI 10.1002/2014JB011084 Harris RA, 1996, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V23, P229, DOI 10.1029/96GL00015 Hubert-Ferrari A, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JB000393 Isik E, 2016, CIVIL ENG PRESENT PR, P191 Isik E, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10207247 Isik E, 2016, PERIOD POLYTECH-CIV, V60, P37, DOI 10.3311/PPci.7661 Isik E, 2015, EARTH SCI RES J, V19, P129, DOI 10.15446/esrj.v19n2.50101 Isseven T, 2006, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V28, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.11.012 Karasin IB, 2017, DUMF MUHENDISLIK DER, V8, P661 KING GCP, 1994, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V84, P935 Kutanis M, 2018, J EARTH SYST SCI, V127, DOI 10.1007/s12040-018-1004-6 Kutanis M, 2017, KSCE J CIV ENG, V21, P1793, DOI 10.1007/s12205-016-0758-0 Luo YF, 2017, INT J STEEL STRUCT, V17, P1157, DOI 10.1007/s13296-017-9023-8 Makropoulos K, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1425, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1425-2012 MCKENZIE D, 1972, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTR S, V30, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1972.tb02351.x Mogi K, 1985, EARTHQUA