Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Present day strike-slip deformation within the southern part of the Izmir-Balikesir Transfer Zone based on GNSS data and implications for seismic hazard assessment in western Anatolia

Pages
143–160
Publication Date
2021-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that strike-slip segments within the IBTZ show variable transport sense and amount of slip along them, and they connect by hard linkage relay ramps with the dip to oblique slip normal faults.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Herein, a combined analysis of Global Navigation Satellite System-derived strain rate maps, in accordance with recent seismicity, was presented to reveal that the N-S extension is accommodated primarily by strike-slip faulting of the Izmir-Balikesir Transfer Zone (IBTZ), where a counter clockwise rotation (similar to 25-100 degrees/Myr) along the vertical axis is dominant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the strain map, the Karaburun Peninsula has the largest strain rates, at 137 nano strain (nstrain)/yr extension (NE-SW) and 126 nstrain/yr (NW-SE) compression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that strike-slip segments within the IBTZ show variable transport sense and amount of slip along them, and they connect by hard linkage relay ramps with the dip to oblique slip normal faults.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İzmir-Balıkesir Transfer Zone · Global Navigation Satellite System · slip rate

Abstract

Herein, a combined analysis of Global Navigation Satellite System-derived strain rate maps, in accordance with recent seismicity, was presented to reveal that the N-S extension is accommodated primarily by strike-slip faulting of the Izmir-Balikesir Transfer Zone (IBTZ), where a counter clockwise rotation (similar to 25-100 degrees/Myr) along the vertical axis is dominant. The results indicated that strike-slip segments within the IBTZ show variable transport sense and amount of slip along them, and they connect by hard linkage relay ramps with the dip to oblique slip normal faults. According to the strain map, the Karaburun Peninsula has the largest strain rates, at 137 nano strain (nstrain)/yr extension (NE-SW) and 126 nstrain/yr (NW-SE) compression. To the south, the largest strain areas begin to shrink where the NW-trending sinistral Riedel Fault is located. The smallest strains in the region were measured on the NE-trending Tuzla Fault, compatible with the right lateral component. Based on this, the northern part of the Karaburun Peninsula has the shortest recurrence period in the region. The geodetic earthquake recurrence periods throughout the region comprise 800 yr for magnitudes 7 and above and 70 year for magnitudes between 6 and 7. The period was calculated as 30 years for M > 5.5 (with 99% probability) and 100 years for M > 6 (with 95% probability). These were consistent with the geodetic earthquake recurrence periods (25-30 years for M > 5.5 and 80-100 years for M > 6). This result showed that the seismic hazard sources in the region have increased the earthquake risk, which may cause loss of life and property in the near future.

🔖

Cite This Article

EYUBAGİL, E. E., SOLAK, H. I., KAYAK, U. S., TİRYAKİOGLU, I., SOZBİLİR, H., AKTUG, B., OZKAYMAK, C. (2021). Present day strike-slip deformation within the southern part of the Izmir-Balikesir Transfer Zone based on GNSS data and implications for seismic hazard assessment in western Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 143–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/189270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aktar M, 2007, GEOPHYS J INT, V171, P1363, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03598.x Aktug B, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES, V114, P1978 Aktug B, 2017, 4 INT C EARTHQ ENG S, P277 Aktug B, 2006, J GEODYN, V41, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.jog.2006.01.004 Akyol N, 2006, GEOPHYS J INT, V166, P1259, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-246x.2006.03053.x Bayrak Y, 2013,
  2. TECTONOPHYSICS, V601, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.05.008 Benetatos C, 2006,
  3. TECTONOPHYSICS, V426, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.08.003 Bozkurt E, 2001, GEODIN ACTA, V14, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0985-3111(01)01066-X Cirmik A, 2017, J AFR EARTH SCI, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.11.020 Dogru A, 2014, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V82, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.12.008 Elitez I, 2014, EGU GEN ASSEMBLY 201. Elitez I, 2016,
  4. TECTONOPHYSICS, V690, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.10.003 Elitez I, 2016,
  5. TECTONOPHYSICS, V688, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.09.024 Emre O, 2018, B EARTHQ ENG, V16, P3229, DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2 Eytemiz C, 2020, MAR SCI TECHNOL B, V9, P51, DOI [10.33714/masteb.635468, DOI 10.33714/masteb.635468] Eyubagil EE, 2020, THESIS. Gessner K, 2013, GONDWANA RES, V24, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2013.01.005 Hall J, 2014,
  6. TECTONOPHYSICS, V635, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.05.002 HANKS TC, 1979, J GEOPHYS RES, V84, P2348, DOI 10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 Herring T, 2018, 20TH EGU GEN ASSEMBL, P8381 Irmak TS, 2013, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V65, P943, DOI 10.5047/eps.2013.05.011 Jenny S, 2004, GEOPHYS J INT, V157, P1331, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02261.x Jolivet L, 2013,
  7. TECTONOPHYSICS, V597, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.011 Jolivet L, 2010, INT J EARTH SCI, V99, P109, DOI 10.1007/s00531-008-0366-4 Kahle HG, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P2513, DOI 10.1029/1999GL900403 Kavak S, 2020, THESIS. Ketin I, 1957, ITU DERG, V15, P49. Kiratzi A, 2003, J GEODYN, V36, P251, DOI 10.1016/S0264-3707(03)00050-4 Kiray H N, 2018, PALEOTEKTONIK DONEM, P34 Kokkalas S, 2013, GEOL MAG, V150, P193, DOI 10.1017/S0016756812000453 Kokkalas S, 2006, GEOL SOC AM SPEC PAP, V409, P97, DOI 10.1130/2006.2409(06) LEPICHON X, 1995, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V100, P12675, DOI 10.1029/95JB00317 MASCLE J, 1990, MAR GEOL, V94, P271, DOI 10.1016/0025-3227(90)90060-W McClusky S, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P5695, DOI 10.1029/1999JB900351 MCKENZIE D, 1972, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTR S, V30, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1972.tb02351.x Nyst M, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JB002830 Ocakoglu N, 2004,
  8. TECTONOPHYSICS, V391, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.07.008