Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2010 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5

Experimental investigation of shaft transducerless speed and position control of ac induction and interior permanent magnet motors

Pages
865–882
Publication Date
2010-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study helps the motion control engineers select the suitable motor and implement the appropriate speed/position estimation algorithm for a given application.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to drive AC motors with high efficiency and high motion performance, and to provide accurate speed/position control, motor shaft speed and/or position feedback is required.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, transducers are not preferred in most of the applications since they increase the cost and decrease the reliability of the drive due to their failure prone structure and connections.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study helps the motion control engineers select the suitable motor and implement the appropriate speed/position estimation algorithm for a given application.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:IPM Motor · induction motor · sensorless

Abstract

In order to drive AC motors with high efficiency and high motion performance, and to provide accurate speed/position control, motor shaft speed and/or position feedback is required. For this purpose, usually transducers (encoder, tachogenerator, resolver, etc.) are installed on the shaft. However, transducers are not preferred in most of the applications since they increase the cost and decrease the reliability of the drive due to their failure prone structure and connections. In such applications, the speed and/or position information of the motor is obtained by estimation methods without using shaft transducers. In this work, motor types and speed/position estimation methods will be surveyed, appropriate estimation methods will be determined based on the motor type (induction or interior permanent magnet synchronous) and the application requirement (speed and/or position control requirement). High frequency signal injection, speed adaptive flux observer, open loop integration based flux observer methods, and combination of them in a hybrid algorithm will be investigated. By implementing these methods, the experimental performance of the shaft transducerless speed and/or position controlled vector control based induction and interior permanent magnet synchronous motors will be presented. The study helps the motion control engineers select the suitable motor and implement the appropriate speed/position estimation algorithm for a given application.

Özet

In order to drive AC motors with high efficiency and high motion performance, and to provide accurate speed/position control, motor shaft speed and/or position feedback is required. For this purpose, usually transducers (encoder, tachogenerator, resolver, etc.) are installed on the shaft. However, transducers are not preferred in most of the applications since they increase the cost and decrease the reliability of the drive due to their failure prone structure and connections. In such applications, the speed and/or position information of the motor is obtained by estimation methods without using shaft transducers. In this work, motor types and speed/position estimation methods will be surveyed, appropriate estimation methods will be determined based on the motor type (induction or interior permanent magnet synchronous) and the application requirement (speed and/or position control requirement). High frequency signal injection, speed adaptive flux observer, open loop integration based flux observer methods, and combination of them in a hybrid algorithm will be investigated. By implementing these methods, the experimental performance of the shaft transducerless speed and/or position controlled vector control based induction and interior permanent magnet synchronous motors will be presented. The study helps the motion control engineers select the suitable motor and implement the appropriate speed/position estimation algorithm for a given application.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSU, Ö., HAVA, A. M. (2010). Experimental investigation of shaft transducerless speed and position control of ac induction and interior permanent magnet motors. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5, 865–882. https://ajindex.com/articles/189001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. A. Savolainen, “Driving towards a Better Future,” ABB Review 4/2004, pp.34-38. J. Holtz, “State of the art of controlled AC drives without speed sensor,” IEEE-PEDS Conf. Records, pp. 1-6, 1995. [3] P. L. Jansen, R. D. Lorenz, ”Transducerless Position and Velocity Estimation in Induction and Salient AC Ma- chines,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 240-247, March/April 1995.
  2. J. I. Ha, S. K. Sul, “Sensorless Şeld-orientation control of an induction machine by high-frequency signal injection,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–51, January/February 1999.
  3. K. Ide, J. I. Ha, M. Sawamura, H. Iura, Y. Yamamoto, “A novel hybrid speed estimator of flux observer for induction motor drives,” In IEEE International. Symposium on Industrial Electronics Records, vol. 3, pp. 822-827,
  4. L Aquila, Italy, July 2002.
  5. Y. Li, N. Ertugrul, ”A Novel, Robust DSP-Based Indirect Rotor Position Estimation for Permanent Magnet AC Motors Without Rotor Saliency,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 539-546, March 2003.
  6. B. Akin, U. Orguner, A. Ersak, M. Ehsani, “Simple derivative-free nonlinear state observer for sensorless AC drives,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on. Mechatronics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 634–643, October 2006.
  7. Y.R.Kim, S.K.Sul, and M.H.Park, “Speed sensorless vector control of induction motor using extended Kalman Şlter,” IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol. 30, no.5 pp.1125-1233, October 1994.
  8. M. Barut, S. Bogosyan, and M. Gokasan, “Speed-sensorless estimation for induction motors using extended Kalman Şlters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 272–280, Feb. 2007.
  9. H. Kubota, I. Sato, Y. Tamura, K. Matsuse, H. Ohta, Y. Hori, “Regenerating-mode low-speed operation of sensorless induction motor drive with adaptiv e observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1081-1086, July/August 2002.
  10. J.-I. Ha, S.-K. Sul, K. Ide, I. Murokita, K. Sawamura, “Physical understanding of high frequency injection method to sensorless drives of an induction machine,” IEEE-IAS Conf. Records, Vol. 3, pp. 1802-1808, 2000.
  11. R. Wu, G. R. Slemon, “A permanent magnet motor drive without a shaft sensor,” IEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 27, pp. 1005-1011, May 1991.
  12. J.-I. Ha, K. Ide, T. Sawa, S. Sul, “Sensorless position control and initial position estimation of an interior permanent magnet motor,” IEEE-IAS Conf. Records, pp. 2607-2613, 2001.
  13. P. L. Jansen, R. D. Lorenz, “Transducerless