Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 5

Semi-active H\infty robust control of six degree of freedom structural system using MR damper

Pages
797–805
Publication Date
2011-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is shown that the H\infty controller performance is satisfactory to suppress the vibration of the structure despite the presence of uncertainties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, H\infty robust control is designed for vibration attenuation of six DOF structure using MR damper.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The controller performance is verified experimentally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is shown that the H\infty controller performance is satisfactory to suppress the vibration of the structure despite the presence of uncertainties.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:MR damper · H\infty robust control · mixed sensitivity problem

Abstract

In this study, H\infty robust control is designed for vibration attenuation of six DOF structure using MR damper. A semi-active seismically excited, nonlinear structural system is modelled. The controller is designed for a reduced order model and applied to the full order model. The controller performance is verified experimentally. It is shown that the H\infty controller performance is satisfactory to suppress the vibration of the structure despite the presence of uncertainties.

Özet

In this study, H\infty robust control is designed for vibration attenuation of six DOF structure using MR damper. A semi-active seismically excited, nonlinear structural system is modelled. The controller is designed for a reduced order model and applied to the full order model. The controller performance is verified experimentally. It is shown that the H\infty controller performance is satisfactory to suppress the vibration of the structure despite the presence of uncertainties.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, Ş., SİVRİOĞLU, S., ZERGEROĞLU, E., YÜKSEK, İ. (2011). Semi-active H\infty robust control of six degree of freedom structural system using MR damper. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 5, 797–805. https://ajindex.com/articles/188700

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Conclusion Housner GW et al.“Structural control: past, present, and future”, J Engng Mech ASCE 1997;123(9):897-971.
  2. Spencer B.F. Jr., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K. and Carlson J.D., “Phenomenological model of a Magnetorheological Damper”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 123, No.3, pp.230-238, 1997.
  3. Dyke S.J., Spencer Jr. B.F., Sain M.K. and Carlson J.D., “Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction”, Smart Mat. Strc. 5, 565-575, 1996. Jansen L.M. and Dyke S.J., “Semiactive Control strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 126, No.8, pp.795-803, August 2000.
  4. Yang G., Spencer Jr. B.F., Carlson J.D. and Sain M.K. “Large-scale MR Fluid Dampers: Modeling and Dynamic Performance Considerations”, Engineering Structures, 24, 309-323, 2002. Jimenez R. and Alvarez L., “Real time identiŞcation of structures with magnetorheological dampers”, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1017-1022, 2002. Jimenez R. And Alvarez-Icaza L., “LuGre friction model for a magnetorheological damper”, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 12:91-116, 2005. Aldemir U., “Optimal Control of Structures with Semiactive-tune Mass Dampers”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 266, 847-874, 2003.
  5. J Yang G, Spencer BF, Jung H-J, Carlson JD. “Dynamic Modeling of large-scale magnetorheological damper systems for civil engineering application”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1107-1114.
  6. Cetin S., Zergeroglu E. Sivrioglu S., and Yuksek I., “Adaptive Control of Structures with MR Damper”, 3rd IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, St. Petersburg, Russia, s.60-65, July 8-10 2009.
  7. Erkus B., Masato A., Fujino Y., “Investigation of Semi-active Control for Seismic protection of Elevated Highway Bridges”, Engineering Structures, Vol.24, Issue 3, pp. 281-293, March 2002.
  8. Sahin, I., Morgul, O. K., Engin, T., “Design and Testing of a Magnetorheological Damper (MR) for Tractor Seat”, 9th International Research/Expert Conference-Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology- TMT 2005, 26-30 September 2005, pp. 1093-1096, Antalya/Turkey Dong X.M., Yu M., Liao C.R., Chen W.M., “Comparative Research on Semi-active Control Strategies for Magneto- rheological Suspension”, Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 59, Issue.3, pp. 433-453, Feb. 2010.
  9. Song X.B., Ahmadian M., Southward S., Miller L.R., “An Adaptive Semiactive Control Algorithm for Magne- torheological