Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Coherence analysis on thermal effect for power cables under different environmental conditions

Pages
25–33
Publication Date
2014-05-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, high correlated peaks in the frequency domain are used to determine the temperature effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are 2 important aspects of this research; these are the experimental study and the data analysis, which are based on coherence analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a low-voltage power cable is tested under 2 different environments, air and water, and the variations in temperature are measured for the conductor, the sheath parts of the cable, and the environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, high correlated peaks in the frequency domain are used to determine the temperature effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Power cable · coherence analysis · current

Abstract

There are 2 important aspects of this research; these are the experimental study and the data analysis, which are based on coherence analysis. In this study, a low-voltage power cable is tested under 2 different environments, air and water, and the variations in temperature are measured for the conductor, the sheath parts of the cable, and the environment. The recorded test data are analyzed using such as coherence analysis. This in turn provides the means to determine the relationship among the sheath, conductor, and the environment. In conclusion, high correlated peaks in the frequency domain are used to determine the temperature effect.

Özet

There are 2 important aspects of this research; these are the experimental study and the data analysis, which are based on coherence analysis. In this study, a low-voltage power cable is tested under 2 different environments, air and water, and the variations in temperature are measured for the conductor, the sheath parts of the cable, and the environment. The recorded test data are analyzed using such as coherence analysis. This in turn provides the means to determine the relationship among the sheath, conductor, and the environment. In conclusion, high correlated peaks in the frequency domain are used to determine the temperature effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, S., ŞEKER, Ş. S., KALENDERLİ, Ö., KARAHAN, M. (2014). Coherence analysis on thermal effect for power cables under different environmental conditions. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 25–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/188666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. G. Yilmaz, S.E. Karlik, “A distributed optical fiber sensor for temperature detection in power cables”, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 125, pp. 148–155, 2006. M. Karahan, ¨ O. Kalenderli, “Coupled electrical and thermal analysis of power cables using finite element method”, in: V.S. Vikhrenko, Heat Transfer - Engineering Applications, InTech, pp. 205–230, 2011.
  2. G. Gela, J.J. Dai, “Calculation of thermal fields of underground cables using the boundary element method”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 3, pp. 1341–1347, 1998.
  3. C.C. Hwang, J.J. Chang, H.Y. Chen, “Calculation of ampacities for cables in trays using finite elements”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 54, pp. 75–81, 2000.
  4. J. Nahman, M. Tanaskovic, “Determination of the current carrying capacity of cables using the finite element method”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 61, pp. 109–117, 2002.
  5. I. Kocar, A. Erta¸s, “Thermal analysis for determination of current carrying capacity of PE and XLPE insulated power cables using finite element method”, IEEE Melecon, pp. 905–908, 2004.
  6. IEC Standard, PD IEC/TR 62095:2003, Electric Cables. Calculations of current ratings. Cable current rating calculations using finite element method, 2003.
  7. S. Whitehead, E.E. Hutchings, “Current rating of cables for transmission and distribution”, Journal of the IEE, Vol. 38, pp. 517–557, 1939.
  8. J.H. Neher, M.H. McGrath, “The calculation of the temperature rise and load capability of cable systems”, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers Part III, Vol. 76, pp. 752–772, 1957.
  9. N. Kovac, I. Sarajcev, D. Poljak, “Nonlinear-coupled electric-thermal modeling of underground cable systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 21, pp. 4–14, 2006.
  10. S. Taskin, S. Seker, M. Karahan, C. Akinci, “Spectral analysis for current and temperature measurements in power cables”, Electric Power Components & Systems, Vol. 37, pp. 415–426, 2009.
  11. G.J. Anders, Rating of Electric Power Cables: Ampacity Calculations for Transmission, Distribution, and Industrial Applications, New York, IEEE Press, 1997.
  12. G.J. Anders, Rating of Electric Power Cables in Unfavorable Thermal Environment, New York, IEEE Press, 2005.
  13. J.J. Desmet, D.J. Putman, F. D’hulster, R.J. Belmans, “Thermal analysis of the influence of nonlinear, unbalanced and asymmetric loads on current conducting capacity of LV-cables”, IEEE PowerTech Conference, 2003.
  14. J.J. Desmet, D.J. Putman, G.M. Vanalme, R.J. Belmans, “Modelling and sensitivity analysis o