Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Composite power system adequacy assessment based on postoptimal analysis

Pages
90–106
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A significant reduction in the computational efforts is experienced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The modeling and evaluation of enormous numbers of contingencies are the most challenging impediments associated with composite power system adequacy assessment, particularly for large-scale power systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Instead of solving all similar problems independently, POA exploits the similarity among them and accelerates the solving procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A significant reduction in the computational efforts is experienced.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Composite power system · linear programming · postoptimal analysis

Abstract

The modeling and evaluation of enormous numbers of contingencies are the most challenging impediments associated with composite power system adequacy assessment, particularly for large-scale power systems. Optimal power flow (OPF) solution, as a widely common approach, is normally employed to model and analyze each individual contingency as an independent problem. However, mathematical representations associated with diverse states are slightly different in one or a few generating units, line outages, or trivial load variations. This inherent attribute brings a promising idea to speed up the contingency evaluation procedure. In this paper, postoptimal analysis (POA), as a well-recognized technique to attack a set of similar problems with minimal effort, is adopted to solve the contingency OPFs. Instead of solving all similar problems independently, POA exploits the similarity among them and accelerates the solving procedure. The proposed method here derives a base case model and obtains its respective solution. Thereafter, the solution associated with a contingency is determined by imposing differences due to unit or line outages or load variation with respect to the base case solution. The proposed approach is applicable in both sorts of analytical and simulation-based evaluation methods. The Roy Billinton test system, the IEEE reliability test system, and the IEEE 118-bus test system are used to demonstrate the performance and efficiency of the proposed approach. A significant reduction in the computational efforts is experienced.

Özet

The modeling and evaluation of enormous numbers of contingencies are the most challenging impediments associated with composite power system adequacy assessment, particularly for large-scale power systems. Optimal power flow (OPF) solution, as a widely common approach, is normally employed to model and analyze each individual contingency as an independent problem. However, mathematical representations associated with diverse states are slightly different in one or a few generating units, line outages, or trivial load variations. This inherent attribute brings a promising idea to speed up the contingency evaluation procedure. In this paper, postoptimal analysis (POA), as a well-recognized technique to attack a set of similar problems with minimal effort, is adopted to solve the contingency OPFs. Instead of solving all similar problems independently, POA exploits the similarity among them and accelerates the solving procedure. The proposed method here derives a base case model and obtains its respective solution. Thereafter, the solution associated with a contingency is determined by imposing differences due to unit or line outages or load variation with respect to the base case solution. The proposed approach is applicable in both sorts of analytical and simulation-based evaluation methods. The Roy Billinton test system, the IEEE reliability test system, and the IEEE 118-bus test system are used to demonstrate the performance and efficiency of the proposed approach. A significant reduction in the computational efforts is experienced.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAFDARIAN, A., FIRUZABAD, M. F., AMINIFAR, F. (2013). Composite power system adequacy assessment based on postoptimal analysis. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 90–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/188637

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. R. Billinton, W. Li, Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods, New York, Plenum Press, 1994.
  2. R. Billinton, R.N. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, 2nd edition, New York, Plenum Press, 1996.
  3. N. Samaan, C. Singh, “A new method for composite system annualized reliability indices based on genetic algorithms”, Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vol. 2, pp. 850–855, 2002.
  4. L. Salvaderi, R. Billinton, “A comparison between two fundamentally different approaches to composite system reliability evaluation”, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-104, pp. 3486–3492, 1985.
  5. G.C. Oliveira, M.V.F. Pereira, S.H.F. Cunha, “A technique for reducing computational effort in Monte Carlo-based composite reliability evaluation”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 1309–1315, 1989.
  6. A.J. Wood, B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation, and Control, New York, Wiley, 1996.
  7. C. Singh, X. Luo, H. Kim, “Power system adequacy and security calculations using Monte Carlo simulation incorporating intelligent system methodology”, 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, pp. 1–9, 2006.
  8. M.V.F. Pereira, M.E.P. Maceira, G.C. Oliveira, L.M.V.G. Pinto, “Combining analytical models and Monte Carlo techniques in probabilistic power system analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 265–272, 1992.
  9. N. Samaan, C. Singh, “Assessment of the annual frequency and duration indices in composite system reliability using genetic algorithms”, Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Vol. 2, pp. 692–697, 2003.
  10. N. Samaan, C. Singh, “Genetic algorithms approach for the assessment of composite power systems reliability considering multi-state components”, 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, pp. 64–69, 2004.
  11. C. Singh, L. Wang, “Role of artificial intelligence in the reliability evaluation of electric power systems”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 189–200, 2008.
  12. D.P. Clancy, G. Gross, F.F. Wu, “Probabilistic flows for reliability evaluation of multi-area power system interconnections”, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 101–114, 1983.
  13. C. Singh, Z. Deng, “A new algorithm for multi-area reliability evaluation - simultaneous decomposition-simulation approach”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 21, pp. 129–136, 1991.
  14. Z. Deng, C. Singh, “A new approach t