Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

A comparison of fuzzy logic and PID controllers to control transmitted power using a TCSC

Pages
1463–1475
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Simulation results show that the fuzzy logic controller has a better response, although it is designed with minimum, simple, triangle membership functions and reduced rule bases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, the use of flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) is an economical and interesting approach to improve power transfer capability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The thyristor-controlled series capacitor, as a member of the FACTS family, can control interrelated parameters with dynamism due to its ability of rapid control and stabilization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Simulation results show that the fuzzy logic controller has a better response, although it is designed with minimum, simple, triangle membership functions and reduced rule bases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:FACTS · thyristor-controlled series capacitor · control power flow

Abstract

Nowadays, the use of flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) is an economical and interesting approach to improve power transfer capability. The thyristor-controlled series capacitor, as a member of the FACTS family, can control interrelated parameters with dynamism due to its ability of rapid control and stabilization. Regardless of all of the works in this area, the control of transmitted power through the design of the firing angle controller is still missing. In this paper, first, the open-loop firing angle controller and its sensitivities are analyzed to fill in this gap. Next, closed-loop controllers such as PID and fuzzy controllers are designed and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink software. Simulation results show that the fuzzy logic controller has a better response, although it is designed with minimum, simple, triangle membership functions and reduced rule bases.

Özet

Nowadays, the use of flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) is an economical and interesting approach to improve power transfer capability. The thyristor-controlled series capacitor, as a member of the FACTS family, can control interrelated parameters with dynamism due to its ability of rapid control and stabilization. Regardless of all of the works in this area, the control of transmitted power through the design of the firing angle controller is still missing. In this paper, first, the open-loop firing angle controller and its sensitivities are analyzed to fill in this gap. Next, closed-loop controllers such as PID and fuzzy controllers are designed and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink software. Simulation results show that the fuzzy logic controller has a better response, although it is designed with minimum, simple, triangle membership functions and reduced rule bases.

🔖

Cite This Article

SORESHJANI, M. H., ABJADI, N. R., KARGAR, A., MARKADEH, G. A. (2014). A comparison of fuzzy logic and PID controllers to control transmitted power using a TCSC. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 1463–1475. https://ajindex.com/articles/187943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. N.G. Hingurani, L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, IEEE Press,
  2. New York, Wiley, 2000.
  3. C.R. Fuerte-Esquivel, E. Acha, H. Ambriz-Perez, “A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 58–64, 2000.
  4. S. Sreejith, P. Sishaj Simon, M.P. Selvan, “Power flow analysis incorporating firing angle model based TCSC”, IEEE Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, pp. 496–501, 2010.
  5. S.R. Joshi, A.M. Kulkarni, “Analysis of SSR performance of TCSC control schemes using a modular high bandwidth discrete-time dynamic model”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 24, pp. 840–848, 2009.
  6. K. Kabiri, S. Henschel, J.R. Marti, H.W. Dommel, “A discrete state space model for SSR stabilizing controller design for TCSC compensated system”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 20, pp. 466–474, 2005.
  7. S.R. Joshi, E.P. Cheriyan, A.M. Kulkarni, “Output feedback SSR damping controller design based on modular discrete-time dynamic model of TCSC”, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 3, pp. 561–573, 2009.
  8. L. Kejun, J. Zhao, C. Zhang, W.J. Lee, “A study on mode-switching control of TCSC based on conditional firing of Thyristor”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 26, pp. 1196–1202, 2011.
  9. A.M. Simoes, D.C. Savelli, P.C. Pellanda, N. Martins, P. Apkarian, “Robust design of a TCSC oscillation damping controller in a weak 500-kV interconnection considering multiple power flow scenarios and external disturbances”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 24, pp. 226–236, 2009.
  10. D. Rai, G. Ramakrishna, S.O. Faried, A.A. Edris, “Enhancement of power system dynamics using a phase imbal- anced series compensation scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 25, pp. 966–974, 2010.
  11. S. Ray, G.K. Venayagamoorthy, B. Chaudhuri, R. Majumder, “Comparison of adaptive critic-based and classical wide-area controllers for power systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 38, pp. 1002–1007, 2008.
  12. D. Rai, S. Faried, G. Ramakrishna, A. Edris, “Damping inter-area oscillations using phase imbalanced series compensation schemes”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 1753–1761, 2011.
  13. J.M. Gonzalez, C.A. Canizares, J.M. Ramirez, “Stability modeling and comparative study of series vectorial compensators”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 25, pp. 1093–1103, 2010.
  14. U. Yolac, T. Yalcinoz, “Compari