Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

USING MACBETH AND MABAC METHODS IN THE SELECTION OF ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEMS

KURUMSAL KAYNAK PLANLAMA (KKP) SİSTEMLERİNİN SEÇİMİNDE MACBETH VE MABAC YÖNTEMLERİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞİK OLARAK KULLANILMASI

Pages
533–552
Publication Date
2019-03-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the most important criteria are functionality, ease of use and brand image; the best performing system alternative is SAP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems enable faster and easier decision making by coordination between different units of enterprises.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to choose the best ERP system by using MACBETH and MABAC methods as integrated in the MCDM methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the most important criteria are functionality, ease of use and brand image; the best performing system alternative is SAP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çok Kriterli Karar Verme · MACBETH · MABAC

Abstract

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems enable faster and easier decision making by coordination between different units of enterprises. Therefore, the selection of the right ERP system is a very important issue for enterprises. Since there are many criteria to be considered in the selection of these systems, it will be possible to take advantage of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. In this study, it was aimed to choose the best ERP system by using MACBETH and MABAC methods as integrated in the MCDM methods. The importance weights of the criterion calculated with MACBETH, which is a subjective method; the system alternatives were evaluated by MABAC method. According to the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the most important criteria are functionality, ease of use and brand image; the best performing system alternative is SAP.

Özet

Kurumsal kaynak planlama (KKP) sistemleri, işletmelerin farklı birimleri arasındaki koordinasyonu sağlayarak, daha hızlı ve kolay karar alınmasını sağlayan sistemlerdir. Dolayısıyla, işletmeler için doğru KKP sisteminin seçim kararı oldukça önemli bir konudur. Bu sistemlerin seçiminde dikkate alınması gereken çok sayıda kriter bulunduğundan, seçim sürecinde çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden yararlanmak mümkün olacaktır. Bu çalışmada Bu çalışmada ÇKKV yöntemlerinden MACBETH ve MABAC yöntemleri bütünleşik olarak kullanılarak, en iyi KKP sisteminin seçilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Subjektif bir yöntem olan MACBETH ile kriterin önem ağırlıkları hesaplanmış, MABAC yöntemiyle ise sistem alternatifleri değerlendirilmiştir. Uygulama sonuçlarına göre en önemli kriterler fonksiyonellik, kullanım kolaylığı ve marka imajı olarak belirlenirken; en iyi sistem alternatifi ise SAP olarak tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYÇİN, E. (2019). USING MACBETH AND MABAC METHODS IN THE SELECTION OF ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEMS. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 533–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/18745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahn, B. S., & Choi, S. H. (2008). ERP System Selection using a SimulationBased AHP Approach: A Case of Korean Home shopping Company. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(3), 322-330.
  2. Alanbay, O. (2005). ERP Selection Using Expert Choice Software. Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 8-10.
  3. Asl, M. B., Khalilzadeh, A., Youshanlouei, H. R., & Mood, M. M. (2012). Identifying and Ranking the Effective Factors on Selecting Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Using the Combined Delphi and Shannon Entropy Approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 513-520.
  4. Baki, B., & Çakar, K. (2005). Determining the ERP Package-Selecting Criteria: The Case of Turkish Manufacturing Companies. Business Process Management Journal, 11(1), 75-86.
  5. Bana e Costa C.A., Chagas M. P. (2004). A Career Choice Problem: An Example of How to Use MACBETH to Build a Quantitative Value Model Based on Qualitative Value Judgments, European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 323–331.
  6. Başar, R., & Arslan, H. M. (2017). Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması (ERP) Yazılımının En Uygun Uzlaşık Çözüm (VIKOR) İle Seçimi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1065-1080.
  7. Bernroider, E. W., & Stix, V. (2003). The Evaluation of ERP Systems using Data Envelopment Analysis. In Proceedings of IRMA (Vol. 2003, pp. 283- 286). Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J. L. (2008). Fuzzy Modeling Enterprise Resource Planning Tool Selection. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 30(3), 137- 147. Carnero, M. C., & Gómez, A. (2016). A multicriteria decision making approach applied to improving maintenance policies in healthcare organizations. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1), 47. Cuadrado, M. R., & Fernández, M. G. (2013). Methodology to select the best business game in higher education. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(7), 589. Demirtaş, N., Alp, Ö. N., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Baraçlı, H. (2011). Fuzzy AHP– TOPSIS Two Stages Methodology for ERP Software Selection: An Application in Passenger Transport Sector. In 15th International Research/Expert Conference ‘Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology, 277-280.
  8. Ecer, F. (2016). ARAS Yöntemi Kullanılarak Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Yazılımı Seçimi. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 89-98.
  9. El-Mashaleh, M. S., Hyari, K. H., Bdour, A. N., & Rababeh, S. M. (2016). A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Construction Enterprise Resource Planning System Selection. Int