Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

COMPARISON OF TOPSIS AND PROMETHEE METHODS IN BANK PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

BANKA PERFORMANS ÖLÇÜMÜNDE TOPSIS VE PROMETHEE YÖNTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
99–117
Publication Date
2020-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the comparative analysis, PROMETHEE method is a more effective evaluation tool in determining the performance of the banks than the TOPSIS method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a model based on multi criteria decision making methods is established to analyze the financial performance of 11 Turkish banks with public, private and foreign capital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to make a comparison of TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods which are used in evaluation of bank performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the comparative analysis, PROMETHEE method is a more effective evaluation tool in determining the performance of the banks than the TOPSIS method.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Banka Performansı · Banka Etkinliği · TOPSIS

Abstract

In this study, a model based on multi criteria decision making methods is established to analyze the financial performance of 11 Turkish banks with public, private and foreign capital. The aim of this study is to make a comparison of TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods which are used in evaluation of bank performance. In this model, where 13 financial ratios are used as criteria, banks are ranked from the highest performance to the lowest. The rankings are compared with the most basic performance criteria, namely the return on assets and the return on equity. According to the comparative analysis, PROMETHEE method is a more effective evaluation tool in determining the performance of the banks than the TOPSIS method.

Özet

Bu çalışmada kamu, özel ve yabancı sermayeli olmak üzere toplam 11 Türk bankasının finansal performanslarının analiz edilmesi için, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerini esas alan bir model oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmanın amacı, banka performansının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan TOPSIS ve PROMETHEE metotlarının bir karşılaştırmasını yapmaktır. Toplam 13 finansal oranın kriter olarak kullanıldığı bu modelde, bankalar en yüksek performanstan en düşüğe doğru sıralanmıştır. Elde edilen sıralamalar, en temel performans kriterleri olan aktif karlılık ve öz kaynak karlılığına olan yakınlıkları ile kıyaslanmıştır. Karşılaştırmalı analizlere göre PROMETHEE yönteminin, banka performansını belirlemede, TOPSIS yöntemine göre daha etkili bir değerlendirme aracı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, T. (2020). COMPARISON OF TOPSIS AND PROMETHEE METHODS IN BANK PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 99–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/18691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bağcı, H., & Rençber, Ö. F. (2014). Kamu Bankaları ve Halka Açık Özel Bankaların Promethee Yöntemi ile Karlılıklarının Analizi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 39-47.
  2. Bayyurt, N. (2013). Ownership Effect on Bank's Performance: Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches on Foreign and Domestic Turkish Banks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 919-928.
  3. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215.
  4. Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European journal of operational research, 98(2), 175-212.
  5. Brans, J. P., Vincke, J. P., (1985). A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision making. Management Science, 31, 647-656.
  6. Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (2005).
  7. PROMETHEE methods, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (pp. 163-186).
  8. Springer, New York, NY. Brown, K., & Skully, M. T. (2002). International studies in comparative banking: a survey of recent developments. Australasian Banking and Finance Conference, Sydney, Australia. Çalışkan, E., & Eren, T. (2016). Bankaların Performanslarının Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 6(2), 85-107.
  9. Dash, M. (2017). A model for bank performance measurement integrating multivariate factor structure with multi-criteria PROMETHEE methodology. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 9(1), 310-332.
  10. Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2010). A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating. Decision Support Systems, 50(1), 55-63.
  11. Gardener, E., Molyneux, P., & Nguyen-Linh, H. (2011). Determinants of efficiency in South East Asian banking. The Service Industries Journal, 31(16), 2693- 2719. European Central Bank (2010). Beyond ROE - How to measure bank performance,Frankfurt,Germany. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ beyondroehowtomeasurebankperformance201009en.pdf Hemmati, M., Dalghandi, S., & Nazari, H. (2013). Measuring relative performance of banking industry using a DEA and TOPSIS. Management Science Letters, 3(2), 499-504.
  12. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191).
  13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. K