Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Lung cancer subtype differentiation from positron emission tomography images

Pages
262–274
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found that the stacking ensemble classifier, which combines a decision tree, AdaBoostM1, and logistic regression methods by a metalearner, was the most accurate method for detecting subtypes of NSCLC, and normalization of feature sets improved the accuracy of the classification method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lung cancer is one of the deadly cancer types, and almost 85% of lung cancers are nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC .
📊
Key Findings & Data:We obtained positron emission tomography PET images of 93 patients with NSCLC, 39 of which had ADC while the rest had SqCC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found that the stacking ensemble classifier, which combines a decision tree, AdaBoostM1, and logistic regression methods by a metalearner, was the most accurate method for detecting subtypes of NSCLC, and normalization of feature sets improved the accuracy of the classification method.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Machine learning · PET · lung cancer

Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the deadly cancer types, and almost 85% of lung cancers are nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC . In the present study we investigated classification and feature selection methods for the differentiation of two subtypes of NSCLC, namely adenocarcinoma ADC and squamous cell carcinoma SqCC . The major advances in understanding the effects of therapy agents suggest that future targeted therapies will be increasingly subtype specific. We obtained positron emission tomography PET images of 93 patients with NSCLC, 39 of which had ADC while the rest had SqCC. Random walk segmentation was applied to delineate three-dimensional tumor volume, and 39 texture features were extracted to grade the tumor subtypes. We examined 11 classifiers with two different feature selection methods and the effect of normalization on accuracy. The classifiers we used were the k-nearest-neighbor, logistic regression, support vector machine, Bayesian network, decision tree, radial basis function network, random forest, AdaBoostM1, and three stacking methods. To evaluate the prediction accuracy we performed a leave-one-out cross-validation experiment on the dataset. We also considered optimizing certain hyperparameters of these models by performing 10-fold cross-validation separately on each training set. We found that the stacking ensemble classifier, which combines a decision tree, AdaBoostM1, and logistic regression methods by a metalearner, was the most accurate method for detecting subtypes of NSCLC, and normalization of feature sets improved the accuracy of the classification method.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYYILDIZ, O., AYDIN, Z., YILMAZ, B., ŞENKAYA, K., KARAÇAVUŞ, S., İÇER, S., TAŞDEMİR, A., KAYA, E. (2020). Lung cancer subtype differentiation from positron emission tomography images. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 262–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/186689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. 1] Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The new lung cancer staging system. Chest 2009
  2. 136 (1): 260-271. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0978 [2] Anagnostou VK, Dimou AT, Botsis T, Killiam EJ, Gustavson MD et al. Molecular classification of non-small cell lung cancer using a 4-protein quantitative assay. Cancer 2012
  3. 118 (6): 1607-1618. doi:10.1002/cncr.26450. [3] Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2015
  4. 10 (9): 1243-1260. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630 [4] Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012
  5. 30 (9): 1234-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010 [5] Orlhac F, Soussan M, Chouahnia K, Martinod E, Buvat I. 18F-FDG PET-derived textural indices reflect tissue-specific uptake pattern in non-small cell lung cancer. PloS One 2015
  6. 10 (12): 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145063 [6] Ypsilantis PP, Siddique M, Sohn HM, Davies A, Cook G et al. Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PET imaging using convolutional neural networks. PloS One 2015
  7. 10 (9): e0137036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137036 [7] Aerts HJWL, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RTH, Parmar C, Grossmann P et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature Communication 2014
  8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5006 [8] Samala R, Moreno W, You Y, Qian W. A novel approach to nodule feature optimization on thin section thoracic CT. Academic Radiology 2009
  9. 16 (4): 418-427. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.10.009 [9] Balagurunathan Y, Gu Y, Wang H, Kumar V, Grove O et al. Reproducibility and prognosis of quantitative features extracted from CT images. Translational Oncology 2014
  10. 7 (1): 72-87. doi: 10.1593/tlo.13844 [10] Hawkins SH, Korecki JN, Balagurunathan Y, Gu Y, Kumar V et al. Predicting outcomes of nonsmall cell lung cancer using CT image features. IEEE Access 2014
  11. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2373335 [11] Aerts HJWL, Grossmann P, Tan Y, Oxnard GR, Rizvi N et al. Defining a radiomic response phenotype: a pilot study using targeted therapy in NSCLC. Science Report 2016
  12. 33860. doi: 10.1038/srep33860 [12] Yu KH, Zhang C, Berry GJ, Altman RB, Re C et al. Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Na