Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Combining metadata and co-citations for recommending related papers

Pages
1519–1534
Publication Date
2020-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed approach could be a better alternative in cases where content is unavailable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Identification of relevant documents is performed to keep track of the state-of-the-art methods and relies on research paper recommender systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The approach incorporates metadata with co-citations to find and rank related articles against a query paper.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed approach could be a better alternative in cases where content is unavailable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Co-citation · cosine similarity · Jensen-Shannon Divergence

Abstract

Identification of relevant documents is performed to keep track of the state-of-the-art methods and relies on research paper recommender systems. The proposed approaches for these systems can be classified into categories like content-based, collaborative filtering-based, and bibliographic information-based approaches. The content-based approaches exploit the full text of articles and provide more promising results than other approaches. However, most content is not freely available because of subscription requirements. Therefore, the scope of content-based approaches is limited. In such scenarios, the best possible alternative could be the exploitation of other openly available resources. Therefore, this research explores the possible use of metadata and bibliographic information to find related articles. The approach incorporates metadata with co-citations to find and rank related articles against a query paper. The similarity score of metadata fields is calculated and combined with co-citations. The proposed approach is evaluated on a newly constructed dataset of 5116 articles. The benchmark ranking against each co-cited document set is established by applying Jensen--Shannon divergence JSD and results are evaluated with the state-of-the-art content-based approach in terms of normalized discounted cumulative gain NDCG . The state-of-the-art content-based approach achieved an NDCG score of 0.86 while the traditional co-citation-based approach scored 0.72. The presented method achieved NDCG scores of 0.73, 0.77, and 0.78 by incorporating the title, co-citation and title, and abstract, respectively, whereas the highest NDCG score of 0.77 was achieved by combining co-citations with metadata. However, better results are achieved by incorporating the title and abstract with NDCG score of 0.81. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed approach could be a better alternative in cases where content is unavailable.

🔖

Cite This Article

AHMAD, S., AFZAL, M. T. (2020). Combining metadata and co-citations for recommending related papers. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 1519–1534. https://ajindex.com/articles/186566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Habib R, Afzal MT. Sections-based bibliographic coupling for research paper recommendation. Scientometrics 2019; 119 (2): 643-656
  2. Breitinger C, Gipp B, Langer S. Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries 2015; 17 (4): 305-338
  3. Perc M, Ozer M, Hojnik J. Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications 2019; 5 (1): 1-7
  4. Helbing D, Brockmann D, Chadefaux T, Donnay K, Blanke U et al. Saving human lives: What complexity science and information systems can contribute. Journal of Statistical Physics 2015; 158 (3): 735-781
  5. Beel J, Gipp B, Langer S, Breitinger C. Paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries 2016; 17 (4): 305-338
  6. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. Recommender Systems Handbook; 2011. p. 1-35
  7. Colavizza G, Boyack KW, van Eck NJ, Waltman L. The closer the better: similarity of publication pairs at different cocitation levels. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2018; 69 (4): 600-609
  8. Gipp B, Beel J. Citation proximity analysis (CPA): a new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In: ISSI’09: 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2009. pp. 571-575
  9. Martinčić-Ipšić S, Močibob E, Perc M. Link prediction on Twitter. PLoS One 2017; 12 (7): e0181079
  10. Jalili M, Orouskhani Y, Asgari M, Alipourfard N, Perc M. Link prediction in multiplex online social networks. Royal Society Open Science 2017; 4 (2): 160863
  11. Yin P, Zhang M, Li X. Recommending scientific literatures in a collaborative tagging environment. In: International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries; Berlin, Germany; 2007. pp. 478-481
  12. Manouselis N, Verbert K. Layered evaluation of multi-criteria collaborative filtering for scientific paper recommendation. Procedia Computer Science 2013; 18: 1189-1197
  13. Melville P, Mooney RJ, Nagarajan R. Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations. AAAI/IAAI 2002; 23: 187-192
  14. Huang Z, Chung W, Ong TH, Chen H. A graph-based recommender system for digital library. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries; Portland, OR, USA; 2002. pp. 65-73
  15. Boyack KW, Small H, Klavans R. Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the Associ