Langmuir Aggregation of Congo Red on CPC and Its Application

Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, microsurface adsorption-spectral correction technique (MASCT) was used to research the interaction between negatively charged sodium diphenyl diazo-bis-a -naphthylamine-4-sulfonate (Congo Red, CR) and positively charged cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in a pH 2.03 BR buffer solution.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The maximal binding number of CR to CPC was calculated to be 1.2 and the adsorption constant was about 2.03 \times 105 L/mol.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:The experiment results indicate that CR was absorbed on the surface of CPC mainly through electrostatic attraction.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Congo Red · Microsurface adsorption-spectral correction technique · Absorbance ratio difference

Abstract

In this paper, microsurface adsorption-spectral correction technique (MASCT) was used to research the interaction between negatively charged sodium diphenyl diazo-bis-a -naphthylamine-4-sulfonate (Congo Red, CR) and positively charged cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in a pH 2.03 BR buffer solution. The experiment results indicate that CR was absorbed on the surface of CPC mainly through electrostatic attraction. This aggregation obeys the Langmuir isothermal adsorption equation. The maximal binding number of CR to CPC was calculated to be 1.2 and the adsorption constant was about 2.03 \times 105 L/mol. This CR-CPC binding product is insensitive to a concentrated electrolyte solution, but higher temperature influences this aggregation. By combining this reaction with the absorbance ratio difference (ARD) theory, a new method was established to determine CPC in natural water. The analytical results show that this method is suitable for the determination of trace level CPC in natural water. It is an effective method because no organic hydrophobic solvent and time consuming 2-phase extraction operation are involved. It is the first time that ARD is used for the determination of cationic surfactant, and it will be widely used in future.

Özet

In this paper, microsurface adsorption-spectral correction technique (MASCT) was used to research the interaction between negatively charged sodium diphenyl diazo-bis-a -naphthylamine-4-sulfonate (Congo Red, CR) and positively charged cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in a pH 2.03 BR buffer solution. The experiment results indicate that CR was absorbed on the surface of CPC mainly through electrostatic attraction. This aggregation obeys the Langmuir isothermal adsorption equation. The maximal binding number of CR to CPC was calculated to be 1.2 and the adsorption constant was about 2.03 \times 105 L/mol. This CR-CPC binding product is insensitive to a concentrated electrolyte solution, but higher temperature influences this aggregation. By combining this reaction with the absorbance ratio difference (ARD) theory, a new method was established to determine CPC in natural water. The analytical results show that this method is suitable for the determination of trace level CPC in natural water. It is an effective method because no organic hydrophobic solvent and time consuming 2-phase extraction operation are involved. It is the first time that ARD is used for the determination of cationic surfactant, and it will be widely used in future.

Keywords

Congo Red Microsurface adsorption-spectral correction technique Absorbance ratio difference Cetylpyridinium chloride

🔖

Cite This Article

LIU, X., REN, J., HUANG, Y., BAI, J., GAO, H. (2008). Langmuir Aggregation of Congo Red on CPC and Its Application. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5, 549–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/185028

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

F. C. Wang, Fine Specialty Chem. 3, 15-16 (1999).
S. L. Feng, J. Wang and J. Fan, Ann. Chim-Rome, 96, 293-300 (2006).
X. Q. Wang and B. Y. Qiu, Deterg. Cosmet. 28, 22-26 (2005).
M. Lei and B. H. Liao, J. Safety Environ. 4, 26-30 (2004).
P. Gerike, H. Klota, J. G. A. Koljman, E. Matthijs and J. Waters, Water Res. 28, 147-154 (1994).
M. Radke, T. Behrends, J. Forster and R. Herrmann, Anal. Chem. 71, 5362-5366 (1999).
S. Taguchi, K. Morisaku, Y. Sengoku and I. Kasahara, Analyst, 124, 1489-1492 (1999).
K. Heinig, C. Vogt and G. Werner, J. Chromatogr. A, 781, 17-22 (1997).
R. Patel and K. S. Patel, Talanta, 48, 923-931 (1999).
T. Masadome, Anal. Lett., 31, 1071-1079 (1998).
K. Agrawal, G. Agnihotri, K. Shrivas, G. L. Mundhara, K. S. Patel and P. Hoﬀmann, Microchim. Acta,, 273-278 (2004).
B. Zhang and H. P. Beck, Anal. Lett., 35, 2511-2526 (2002).
I. Kasahara, M. Kanai, M. Taniguchi, A. Kakeba, N. Hata, S. Taguchi and K. Goto, Anal. Chim. Acta. 219, –245 (1989).
S. Motomizu, M. Oshima and Y. Hosoi, Microchim. Acta 106, 45-55 (1992).
T. Sakai, Anal. Chim. Acta 147, 331-337 (1983).
H. Y. Wang, H. W. Gao and J. F. Zhao, B. Kor. Chem. Soc., 24, 1444-1448 (2003).
S. T. Li and S. L. Zhao, Anal. Chim. Acta, 501, 99-102 (2004).
M. Kamaya, Y. Kaneko and K. Nagashima, Anal. Chim. Acta, 384, 215-218 (1999).
H. W. Gao, J. F. Zhao, Q. Z. Yang, X. H. Liu, L. Chen and L. T. Pan, Proteomics 6, 5140-5151 (2006).
H. W. Gao, S. Q. Sia, H. W. Wang and J. F. Zhap, Water Res., 38, 1642-1650 (2004).
I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 40, 1361-1403 (1918).
H. W. Gao, H. Y. Wang, S. Y. Zhang and J. F. Zhao, New J. Chem., 27, 1649-1656 (2003).
G. Scatchard, I. H. Scheinerg and S. H. Armstrong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72, 535-540 (1950).
R. T. Tarawneh, I. I. Hamdan, A. Bani-Jaber, R. M. Darwish, Int. J. Pharm., 289, 179-187 (2005).
H. W. Gao and J. F. Zhao, J. Anal. Chem., 58, 366-371 (2003).