Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5

Characterization and CO Oxidation Activity Studies of Co-Based Catalysts

Pages
465–471
Publication Date
2007-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Low temperature CO oxidation activity measurements showed that the best activity was obtained from the 50/50 Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst, which has the light of temperature around 122 °C and yielded 100% CO conversion above 160 °C.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cobalt oxide based catalysts were developed for carbon monoxide oxidation at low temperature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation and calcined at 200 °C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Low temperature CO oxidation activity measurements showed that the best activity was obtained from the 50/50 Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst, which has the light of temperature around 122 °C and yielded 100% CO conversion above 160 °C.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cobalt oxide · cerium · silver oxide

Abstract

Cobalt oxide based catalysts were developed for carbon monoxide oxidation at low temperature. The catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation and calcined at 200 °C. Several techniques were used to characterize the catalysts, such as X-ray diffractometer system, N2 physisorption measurements, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Carbon monoxide oxidation studies were carried out to investigate the relation between the characteristic properties of the catalysts and the catalytic activity. Catalytic activity measurements were studied from room temperature to 200 °C, using a feed composition of 1% CO, 21% O2, and remaining He. X-ray studies showed that the catalysts have an amorphous phase structure. The average pore diameter of the catalysts was in the mesopore diameter range. The pore sizes and pore volumes of the catalysts increased with increasing molar ratio of cobalt oxide in the catalysts. BET surface areas of the catalysts mostly depend on the cobalt oxide molar ratio in the structure of the catalysts. Low temperature CO oxidation activity measurements showed that the best activity was obtained from the 50/50 Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst, which has the light of temperature around 122 °C and yielded 100% CO conversion above 160 °C.

Özet

Cobalt oxide based catalysts were developed for carbon monoxide oxidation at low temperature. The catalysts were prepared by co-precipitation and calcined at 200 °C. Several techniques were used to characterize the catalysts, such as X-ray diffractometer system, N2 physisorption measurements, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Carbon monoxide oxidation studies were carried out to investigate the relation between the characteristic properties of the catalysts and the catalytic activity. Catalytic activity measurements were studied from room temperature to 200 °C, using a feed composition of 1% CO, 21% O2, and remaining He. X-ray studies showed that the catalysts have an amorphous phase structure. The average pore diameter of the catalysts was in the mesopore diameter range. The pore sizes and pore volumes of the catalysts increased with increasing molar ratio of cobalt oxide in the catalysts. BET surface areas of the catalysts mostly depend on the cobalt oxide molar ratio in the structure of the catalysts. Low temperature CO oxidation activity measurements showed that the best activity was obtained from the 50/50 Co3O4/CeO2 catalyst, which has the light of temperature around 122 °C and yielded 100% CO conversion above 160 °C.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALIKÇI, F., GÜLDÜR, Ç. (2007). Characterization and CO Oxidation Activity Studies of Co-Based Catalysts. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5, 465–471. https://ajindex.com/articles/184925

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. L.F. Liotta, G.D. Carlo, G. Pantaleo, A.M. Venezia and G. Deganello, Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 66, 217 (2006).
  2. D. Song and J. Li, J. Mol. Catal. A- Chem. 247, 206 (2006).
  3. N.O. Elbashir, P. Dutta, A. Manivannan, M.S. Seehra and C.B. Roberts, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 285, 169 (2005).
  4. M. Luo, X. Yuan and X. Zheng, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 175, 121 (1998).
  5. J. Jansson, A.E.C. Palmqvist, E. Fridell, M. Skoglundh, L. ¨Osterlund, P. Thormahlen and V. Langer, J. Catal., 387 (2002).
  6. M. Kang, M.W. Song and C.H. Lee, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 251, 143 (2003).
  7. P. Thormahlen, E. Fridell, N. Cruise, M. Skoglundh and A. Palmqvist, Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 31, 1 (2001). C¸. G¨uld¨ur and F. Balık¸cı, Int. J. Hyd. Ener. 27, 219 (2002).
  8. G.N. Salaita, Z.F. Hazos and G.B. Hoflund, J. Elec. Spec. Rel. Phen. 107, 73 (2000).
  9. A.I. Boronin, S.V. Koscheev, K.T. Murzakhmetov, V.I. Avdeev and G.M. Zhidomirov, Appl. Surf. Sci. 165, (2000).
  10. G.I.N. Waterhouse, G.A. Bowmaker and J.B. Metson, Appl. Surf. Sci. 183, 191 (2000).
  11. D.V. Cesar, C.A. Perez, M. Schmal and V.M.M. Salim, Appl. Surf. Sci. 157, 159 (2000).
  12. H.A.E. Hagelin-Weaver, G.B. Hoflund, D.M. Minahan and G.N. Salaita, Appl. Surf. Sci. 235, 420 (2004).
  13. F. Larachi, J. Pierre, A. Adnot and A. Bernis, Appl. Surf. Sci. 195, 236 (2002).
  14. J.Z. Colina, R.M. Nix and H. Weiss, Surf. Sci. 563, 251 (2004).
  15. B. Skarman, D. Grandjean, R.E. BenŞeld, A. Hinz, A. Andersson and L.R. Wallenberg, J. Catal. 211, 119 (2002).