SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Preparation and characterization of nonmetal promoter modified CuZnAl catalysts for higher alcohol from synthesis gas through complete liquid phase method

Shi-rui YU
Xiao-dong WANG
Wei HUANG
Pages
381–387
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The optimized modified CuZnAl catalyst without any metal additives provides a CO conversion of 28.9%, C2+OH selectivity of up to 42.8%, and hydrocarbon selectivity of 2.5%, with a total alcohol selectivity of 67.4% under the reaction conditions of 5.0 MPa, 250 °C, H2/CO = 1, and a gas hourly space velocity of 360 mL/gcat h.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A complete liquid phase technology and a function regulator were applied to prepare CuZnAl catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Characterizations showed that the introduction of the function regulator can change the reduction ability of copper oxides and the surface basicity of catalysts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The optimized modified CuZnAl catalyst without any metal additives provides a CO conversion of 28.9%, C2+OH selectivity of up to 42.8%, and hydrocarbon selectivity of 2.5%, with a total alcohol selectivity of 67.4% under the reaction conditions of 5.0 MPa, 250 °C, H2/CO = 1, and a gas hourly space velocity of 360 mL/gcat h.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Complete liquid phase method · CuZnAl catalyst · higher alcohols

Abstract

A complete liquid phase technology and a function regulator were applied to prepare CuZnAl catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis. Characterizations showed that the introduction of the function regulator can change the reduction ability of copper oxides and the surface basicity of catalysts. Activity tests indicated that the selectivity of higher alcohol is high when considerable medium-strong basicity and the synergistic effects of copper ion and metal copper exist on the catalytic surface. The optimized modified CuZnAl catalyst without any metal additives provides a CO conversion of 28.9%, C2+OH selectivity of up to 42.8%, and hydrocarbon selectivity of 2.5%, with a total alcohol selectivity of 67.4% under the reaction conditions of 5.0 MPa, 250 °C, H2/CO = 1, and a gas hourly space velocity of 360 mL/gcat h.

Özet

A complete liquid phase technology and a function regulator were applied to prepare CuZnAl catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis. Characterizations showed that the introduction of the function regulator can change the reduction ability of copper oxides and the surface basicity of catalysts. Activity tests indicated that the selectivity of higher alcohol is high when considerable medium-strong basicity and the synergistic effects of copper ion and metal copper exist on the catalytic surface. The optimized modified CuZnAl catalyst without any metal additives provides a CO conversion of 28.9%, C2+OH selectivity of up to 42.8%, and hydrocarbon selectivity of 2.5%, with a total alcohol selectivity of 67.4% under the reaction conditions of 5.0 MPa, 250 °C, H2/CO = 1, and a gas hourly space velocity of 360 mL/gcat h.

🔖

Cite This Article

YU, S., WANG, X., HUANG, W. (2014). Preparation and characterization of nonmetal promoter modified CuZnAl catalysts for higher alcohol from synthesis gas through complete liquid phase method. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 381–387. https://ajindex.com/articles/184865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Schmidt, L. D.; Dauenhauer, P. J. Nature 2007, 447, 914–915.
  2. Prasad, S.; Singh, A.; Joshi, H. C. Resour. Conser. Recycl. 2007, 50, 1–39.
  3. Xu, X. D.; Doesburg, E. B. M.; Scholten, J. J. F. Catal. Today 1987, 2, 125–170.
  4. Subramani, V.; Gangwal, S. K. Energy & Fuels 2008, 22, 814–839.
  5. Pratt, S. J.; King, D. A. Surf. Sci. 2003, 540, 185–206.
  6. Lee, J. S.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y. G. Top. Catal. 1995, 2, 127–140. Llorca J.; Homs, N.; Sales, J.; Fierro, J. L. G.; de la Piscina, P. R. J. Catal. 2002, 209, 306–317. O’Brien, R. J.; Xu, L.; Milburn, D. R.; Li, Y.; Klabunde, K. J.; Davis, B. H. Top. Catal. 1995, 2, 1–15.
  7. Zuo, Z. J.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y. J.; Huang, W. Catal. Comm. 2013, 34, 69–72.
  8. Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 12663–12676.
  9. Liao, F. G.; Huang, Y. Q.; Ge, J. W.; Zheng, W. R.; Tedsree, K.; Collier, P.; Hong, X. L.; Tsang, S. C. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2162–2166.
  10. Waugh, K. C. Catal. Lett. 1999, 58, 163–165.
  11. Sun, K. P.; Lu, W. W.; Qiu, F. Y.; Liu, S. W.; Xu, X. L. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2003, 252, 243–249.
  12. Ge, Q. J.; Huang, Y. M.; Qiu, F. Y.; Li, S. B. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1998, 167, 23–30.
  13. Moradi, G. R.; Nosrati, S.; Yaripor, F. Catal. Comm. 2007, 8, 598–606.
  14. Li, J. L.; Zhang, X. G.; Inui, T. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1997, 164, 303–311.
  15. Zheng, X. M.; Fei, J. H.; Hou, Z. Y. Chin. J. Chem. 2001, 19, 67–72.
  16. Ng, K. L.; Chadwick, D.; Toseland, B. A. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 3587–3592.
  17. Gao, Z. H.; Hao, L. F.; Huang, W.; Xie, K. C. Catal. Lett. 2005, 102, 139–141.
  18. Gao, Z. H.; Huang, W.; Yin, L. H.; Xie, K. C. Fuel Process. Tech. 2009, 90, 1442–1446.
  19. Gao, Z. H.; Huang, W.; Yin, L. H.; Hao, L. F.; Xie, K. C. Catal. Lett. 2009, 127, 354–357.
  20. Wang, J. J.; Chernavskii, P. A.; Wang, Y.; Khodakov, A. Y. Fuel 2012, 286, 51–61.
  21. Liu, L. PhD, Taiyuan, Taiyuan University of Technology, 2010, 56–62.
  22. Sun, Q.; Auroux, A.; Shen, J. Y. J. Catal. 2006, 244, 1–9. Meli´ an-Cabrera, I.; L´ opez Granados, M.; Fierro, J. L. G. J. Catal. 2002, 210, 285–294.
  23. Spencer, M. S. Surf. Sci. 1987, 192, 336–343.
  24. Gong, J. L.; Yue, H. R.; Zhao, Y. J.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, L.; Lv, J.; Wang, S. P.; Ma, X. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13922–13925.