SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

Effects of functional groups of triple bonds containing molecules on nickel electroplating

Esma SEZER
Belkıs USTAMEHMETOĞLU
Ramazan KATIRCI
Pages
701–715
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The surface coverage (q) values of the PS and PA molecules were determined from adsorption isotherms and the results show that PA has higher % q.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of propargyl alcohol (PA), propynol ethoxylate (PME), propargyl sulfonate (PS), and diethylaminopropyne (DEP) compounds as additives in a Watts bath on coating brightness, thickness, and efficiency were investigated and compared using electrochemical methods such as linear and square wave voltammetry (SWV), chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, electrochemical impedance (EIS), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The charge transfer resistance values obtained in the presence of PA and PME were similar and higher than the other values obtained; this result suggests that PA and PME have better adsorption.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The surface coverage (q) values of the PS and PA molecules were determined from adsorption isotherms and the results show that PA has higher % q.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nickel electroplating · brightener · leveler

Abstract

The effects of propargyl alcohol (PA), propynol ethoxylate (PME), propargyl sulfonate (PS), and diethylaminopropyne (DEP) compounds as additives in a Watts bath on coating brightness, thickness, and efficiency were investigated and compared using electrochemical methods such as linear and square wave voltammetry (SWV), chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, electrochemical impedance (EIS), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. The charge transfer resistance values obtained in the presence of PA and PME were similar and higher than the other values obtained; this result suggests that PA and PME have better adsorption. The optic and XRF measurements revealed that for the PS molecule the plating is the brightest, and its leveling effect is the highest at the high current density, while the PA molecule has the same effect at low current density. The surface coverage (q) values of the PS and PA molecules were determined from adsorption isotherms and the results show that PA has higher % q. In addition, the optimization of PA, PME, PS, and DEP molecules was performed using a RHF basis set, and the results agreed with the experimental results. The SEM results obtained in the presence of additives revealed that brighter and smoother surfaces were obtained at low concentrations.

Özet

The effects of propargyl alcohol (PA), propynol ethoxylate (PME), propargyl sulfonate (PS), and diethylaminopropyne (DEP) compounds as additives in a Watts bath on coating brightness, thickness, and efficiency were investigated and compared using electrochemical methods such as linear and square wave voltammetry (SWV), chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, electrochemical impedance (EIS), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. The charge transfer resistance values obtained in the presence of PA and PME were similar and higher than the other values obtained; this result suggests that PA and PME have better adsorption. The optic and XRF measurements revealed that for the PS molecule the plating is the brightest, and its leveling effect is the highest at the high current density, while the PA molecule has the same effect at low current density. The surface coverage (q) values of the PS and PA molecules were determined from adsorption isotherms and the results show that PA has higher % q. In addition, the optimization of PA, PME, PS, and DEP molecules was performed using a RHF basis set, and the results agreed with the experimental results. The SEM results obtained in the presence of additives revealed that brighter and smoother surfaces were obtained at low concentrations.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, E., USTAMEHMETOĞLU, B., KATIRCI, R. (2014). Effects of functional groups of triple bonds containing molecules on nickel electroplating. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 701–715. https://ajindex.com/articles/184780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Schlesinger, M.; Paunovic, M. Modern Electroplating; 4th edition; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  2. Cotell, C. M.; Sprague, J. A.; Smidt, F. A. Surface engineering, 5; ASM International Handbook Committee, 1994.
  3. Paunovic, M.; Schlesinger, M. Fundamentals of Electrochemical Deposition; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  4. Oniciu, L.; Muresan, L. J. App. Electrochem. 1991, 21, 565–574.
  5. Kaneko, N.; Shinohara, N.; Itoh, Y.; Nezu, H. Bunseki Kagaku. 1991, 40, 655–660.
  6. Wu, Y.; Chang, D. Y.; Kim, D. S.; Kwon, S. C. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2003, 162, 269–275.
  7. Wang, S. L.; Hong L. L.; Yu, W. W. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 2008, 21, 50–56.
  8. Oliveira, E. M.; Finazz, G. A.; Carlos, I. A. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2005, 200, 5978–5985.
  9. Langmuir, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 221–2295.
  10. Langmuir, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1917, 39, 1848–1906.
  11. Langmuir, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403.
  12. Musa, A. Y.; Kadhum, A. A.; Mohamad, A. B.; Takriff, M. S.; Daud, A. R.; Kamarudin, S. K. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2010, 17, 34–39.
  13. Zarrouk, A.; Hammouti, B.; Zarrok, H.; Salghi, R.; Dafali, A.; Bazzi, L. H.; Bammou, L.; Al-Deyab, S. S. Der Pharma Chemica 2012, 4, 337–346.
  14. Hamdy, A. S.; E.; El-Shenawy, E.; El-Bitar, T. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2006, 1, 171–180.
  15. Osteryoung, J. G.; Osteryoung, R. A. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 101A–110A. Ramaley, L.; Krause, M. S. Jr. Anal. Chem. 1969, 41, 1362–1365.
  16. Daniele, S.; Bragato, C.; Baldo, A. M. Electrochem. Commun. 2002, 4, 374–378.
  17. Milivoj, L. Electroanalytical Methods; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010. Ate¸s, M.; Sara¸c, A. S. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65, 281–287.
  18. Fevzi, C¸.; Cebeci, H. G.; Sezer, E.; Sara¸c, A. S. J. Electroanal.Chem. 2007, 610, 13–121.
  19. Fevzi, C¸.; Cebeci, H. G.; Sezer, E.; Sara¸c, A. S. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 6354–6360.
  20. Prabbu, R. A.; Venkatesha, T. V.; Shanbhag, A. V.; Kulkarni, G. M.; Kalkhambkar, R. G. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 3356–3362.
  21. Ozcan, M.; Dehri, I.; Erbil, M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 236, 155–164.
  22. Ying, Y.; Weihua, L.; Lankun, C.; Baorong, H. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 5953–5960.
  23. Machnikova, E.; Kenton, H.; Hackerman, N. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 6024–6032.