Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Umpolung strategy: advances in catalytic C-C bond formations

Pages
586–609
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, enzyme and NHC catalyzed reactions mainly involve asymmetric applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This mini-review examines the recent advances in umpolung strategy, devised originally by Corey and Seebach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the context of umpolung, the studies are evaluated under 3 main titles: enzyme, N-heterocyclic carbene, and cyanide ion catalyzed reactions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, enzyme and NHC catalyzed reactions mainly involve asymmetric applications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Umpolung · thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) · N-heterocyclic carbene

Abstract

This mini-review examines the recent advances in umpolung strategy, devised originally by Corey and Seebach. Although numerous stoichiometric variants have been published to date, this article covers just the catalytic C-C bond forming reactions due to their major benefits such as atom economy, less pollution, and workable simplicity. In the context of umpolung, the studies are evaluated under 3 main titles: enzyme, N-heterocyclic carbene, and cyanide ion catalyzed reactions. In particular, enzyme and NHC catalyzed reactions mainly involve asymmetric applications.

Özet

This mini-review examines the recent advances in umpolung strategy, devised originally by Corey and Seebach. Although numerous stoichiometric variants have been published to date, this article covers just the catalytic C-C bond forming reactions due to their major benefits such as atom economy, less pollution, and workable simplicity. In the context of umpolung, the studies are evaluated under 3 main titles: enzyme, N-heterocyclic carbene, and cyanide ion catalyzed reactions. In particular, enzyme and NHC catalyzed reactions mainly involve asymmetric applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

EYMUR, S., GÖLLÜ, M., TANYELİ, C. (2013). Umpolung strategy: advances in catalytic C-C bond formations. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 586–609. https://ajindex.com/articles/184761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991.
  2. Corey, E. J.; Cheng, X. M. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1995.
  3. Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 259–281. IUPAC Comp. Chem. Term. (2nd Edition) 1994, 99, 1174. Seebach, D.; Corey E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 231–237. W¨ ohler, F.; Liebig, J. Ann. Pharm. 1832, 3, 249–282.
  4. Lapworth, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1903, 83, 995–1005. (a) Yu, H.-Z.; Fu, Y.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8025–8032. (b) Enders, D.; Shil-Vock, J. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 359–373. (c) Enders, D.; Balensiefer, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 534–541. (a) Seebach, D. Synthesis 1969, 1, 17–36. (b) Albright, J. D. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3207–3233. (c) Ferrino, S. A.; Maldonado, L. A. Synth. Commun. 1980, 10, 717–723. (d) Hanzawa, Y.; Tabuchi, N.; Taguchi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8141–8144. (e) Hanzawa, Yuji; Tabuchi, N.; Saito, K.; Noguchi, S.; Taguchi, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2395–2398. (f) Reutrakul, V.; Ratananukul, P.; Nimgirawath, S. Chem. Lett. 1980, 9, 71–72. (g) Enders, D.; Lotter, H.; Maigrot, N.; Mazaleyrat, J. P.; Welvart, Z. Nouv. J. Chim. 1984, 8, 747–750. (a) Seoane, G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2000, 4, 283–304. (b) Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 5th Edn. 2004. (c) Pohl, M.; Sprenger, G. A.; M¨ uller, M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 335–342. (d) Sukuraman, J.; Hanefeld, U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 530–542.
  5. Ukai, T.; Tanaka, R.; Dokawa, T. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1943, 63, 296–300.
  6. Mizuhara, S.; Handler, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 571–573.
  7. Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3719–3726. (a) Chipman, D. M.; Duggleby, R. G.; Tittmann, K. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 475–481. (b) McCourt, J. A.; Duggleby, R. G. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2005, 30, 222–225.
  8. Duggleby, R. G.; Pang, S. S. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 33, 1–33. (a) Wilcocks, R.; Ward, O. P. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 39, 1058–1063. (b) Wilcoks, R.; Ward, O. P.; Collins, S.; Dewney, N. J.; Hong, Y.; Prosen, E. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 1699–1704. (c) Prosen, E.; Ward, O. P. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1994, 13, 287–291.
  9. Wilcocks, R.; Ward, O. P.; Collins, S.; Dewdney, N. J.; Hong, Y.; Prosen, E. Biochemistry 1992, 27, 2197–2205.
  10. Demir, A. S.; D¨ unnwald, T.; ˙Iding, H.; Pohl, M.; Muller, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4769–4774.
  11. De Maria, P. D.; Pohl, M.; Gocke, D.; Gr¨ oger, H.; Trautwein, H.; Stillger