Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Enhanced uptake capacities and isosteric heats of CO2 and CH4 adsorption on spent coffee ground activated carbons loaded with metal ions

Pages
948–962
Publication Date
2019-06-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The isosteric heats of adsorptionwere calculated at 0–35 ◦ C with the range of 20–35 kJ mol􀀀1 and 18–23 kJ mol􀀀1 for CO2 and CH4 , respectively.According to our findings, bio-based ACs can be used as an effective and alternative adsorbent for capturing differentgas molecules.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Low-cost activated carbon (AC) samples obtained from waste coffee grounds were used for CO2 and CH4adsorption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:AC carbonizedat 800 ◦ C showed a relatively high surface area (582.92 m2 g􀀀1) and high adsorption capacities of 2.6 mmol g􀀀1 and1.1 mmol g􀀀1 at 25 ◦ C for CO2 and CH4 , respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The isosteric heats of adsorptionwere calculated at 0–35 ◦ C with the range of 20–35 kJ mol􀀀1 and 18–23 kJ mol􀀀1 for CO2 and CH4 , respectively.According to our findings, bio-based ACs can be used as an effective and alternative adsorbent for capturing differentgas molecules.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bio-based activated carbon · CO2 adsorption · CH4 adsorption

Abstract

Low-cost activated carbon (AC) samples obtained from waste coffee grounds were used for CO2 and CH4adsorption. ACs were prepared by chemical activation and carbonized at three different temperatures. AC carbonizedat 800 ◦ C showed a relatively high surface area (582.92 m2 g􀀀1) and high adsorption capacities of 2.6 mmol g􀀀1 and1.1 mmol g􀀀1 at 25 ◦ C for CO2 and CH4 , respectively. Adsorbent samples were prepared by loading of Fe3+ metalions onto ACs and their adsorption capacities were compared with those of nonloaded ACs. As expected, the loading ofFe3+ metal ions increased the adsorption capacities at all temperatures and the adsorption capacity of Fe3+ -loaded ACcarbonized at 800 ◦ C was 3.1 mmol g􀀀1 for CO2 and 1.2 mmol g􀀀1 for CH4 at 25 ◦ C. The isosteric heats of adsorptionwere calculated at 0–35 ◦ C with the range of 20–35 kJ mol􀀀1 and 18–23 kJ mol􀀀1 for CO2 and CH4 , respectively.According to our findings, bio-based ACs can be used as an effective and alternative adsorbent for capturing differentgas molecules.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRBIYIK, Ç., BÜYÜKBEKAR, B. Z., KUŞ, M., ERSÖZ, M. (2019). Enhanced uptake capacities and isosteric heats of CO2 and CH4 adsorption on spent coffee ground activated carbons loaded with metal ions. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 948–962. https://ajindex.com/articles/184311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. WMO. The State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Based on Global Observations through 2015. World Meteorological Organization. 2016
  2. He, J. J.; To, J. W. F.; Psarras, P. C.; Yan, H. P.; Atkinson, T.; Holmes, R. T.; Nordlund, D.; Bao, Z. N.; Wilcox, J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502491
  3. Plaza, M. G.; Gonzalez, A. S.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2015, 90, 1592-1600
  4. Fujiki, J.; Chowdhury, F. A.; Yamada, H.; Yogo, K. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 273-282
  5. Heidari, A.; Younesi, H.; Rashidi, A.; Ghoreyshi, A. A. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 503-513
  6. Sarici-Ozdemir, C.; Onal, Y. Particul. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 254-261
  7. Royer, B.; Cardoso, N. F.; Lima, E. C.; Vaghetti, J. C. P.; Simon, N. M.; Calvete, T. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1213-1222
  8. Wickramaratne, N. P.; Jaroniec, M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1849-1855
  9. Baccar, R.; Bouzid, J.; Feki, M.; Montiel, A. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1522-1529
  10. Namasivayam, C.; Kadirvelu, K. Carbon 1999, 37, 79-84
  11. Zhang, Q. L.; Lin, Y. C.; Chen, X.; Gao, N. Y. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148, 671-678
  12. Mohan, D.; Sarswat, A.; Singh, V. K.; Alexandre-Franco, M.; Pittman, C. U. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 1111-1125
  13. Sarici-Ozdemir, C.; Kilic, F. Particul. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 194-201
  14. Sarici-Ozdemir, C.; Onal, Y.: Akmil-Basar, C. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 979-986
  15. Kante, K.; Nieto-Delgado, C.; Rangel-Mendez, J. R.; Bandosz, T. J. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201, 141-147
  16. Xiao, J.; Ma, X. L.; Song, C. S.; Li, Z. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 238
  17. Laksaci, H.; Khelifi, A.; Trari, M.; Addoun, A. J. Clean Prod. 2017, 147, 254-262
  18. Kirbiyik, C.; Putun, A. E.; Putun E. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 423-436
  19. Kirbiyik, C.; Kilic, M.; Cepeliogullar, O.; Putun, A. E. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 66, 231-238
  20. Hong, S. M.; Jang, E.; Dysart, A. D.; Pol, V. G.; Lee, K. B. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34590
  21. Younas, M.; Leong, L. K.; Mohamed, A. R.; Sethupathi, S. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2016, 203, 1455-1463
  22. Abbas, M.; Kaddour, S.; Trari, M. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 745-751
  23. Tseng, R. L.; Wu, F. C.; Juang, R. S. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 140, 53-60
  24. Creamer, A. E.; Gao, B.; Zhang, M. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 249, 174-179
  25. Hulicova-Jurcakova, D.; Kodama, M.; Shiraishi, S.; Hatori, H.; Zhu, Z. H.; Lu, G. Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1800-1809
  26. Togashi, T.; Naka, T.; Asahina, S.; Sato, K.; Takami, S.; Adschiri, T. Dalton Trans. 2011,