Journals / Acta Aquatica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Seasonal Distribution of Rotifera Compositions and Abundance in Kayalıköy Reservoir (Kırklareli/Turkey)

Kayalıköy Baraj Gölü’nün (Kırklareli/Turkey) Rotifera Kompozisyonu, Bolluğu ve Mevsimsel Dağılımı

Pages
246–256
Publication Date
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When we examined the species identified in the reservoir, the distribution of the individuals that make up the Rotifera fauna and physicochemical parameters as a whole, it has been concluded that Kayalıköy reservoir has water suitable for drinking, agricultural irrigation and aquaculture and it’s classified as oligomesotrophic character.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the diversity, abundance seasonal distribution of Rotifera in Kayalıköy reservoir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rotifera and water samples were collected monthly intervals from May 2018 to April 2019 in three different stations in the reservoir and some environmental parameters were also measured.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When we examined the species identified in the reservoir, the distribution of the individuals that make up the Rotifera fauna and physicochemical parameters as a whole, it has been concluded that Kayalıköy reservoir has water suitable for drinking, agricultural irrigation and aquaculture and it’s classified as oligomesotrophic character.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rotifera · tür çeşitliliği · mevsimsel dağılım

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the diversity, abundance seasonal distribution of Rotifera in Kayalıköy reservoir. Rotifera and water samples were collected monthly intervals from May 2018 to April 2019 in three different stations in the reservoir and some environmental parameters were also measured. A total of 40 species from Rotifera were determined in the reservoir. The quantitative evaluation of the Rotifera samples were found an average of 27938 ± 18992 ind/m3in the Kayalıköy reservoir. The maximum numbers of Rotifera in the reservoir were found in autumn (42966 ind/m3) and at 2nd station (33487 ind/m3), the minimum numbers were recorded in winter (1474 ind/m3) and at 1st stations (24850 ind/m3). The most common species in the reservoir were found Brachionus quadridentatus, Keratella cochlearis, K. quadrata, Synchaeta pectinata, Asplanchna priodonta, Polyarthra vulgaris and Filinia longiseta. According to the water quality standards of Turkey, the water quality of Kayalıköy reservoir was found Class I and A1. When we examined the species identified in the reservoir, the distribution of the individuals that make up the Rotifera fauna and physicochemical parameters as a whole, it has been concluded that Kayalıköy reservoir has water suitable for drinking, agricultural irrigation and aquaculture and it’s classified as oligomesotrophic character.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Kayalıköy baraj gölünün Rotifera tür çeşitliliğini, bolluğunu ve mevsimsel dağılımını belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmada Kayalıköy Barajı’nda belirlenen 3 istasyonda Mayıs 2018 ile Nisan 2019 tarihleri arasında Rotifera örnekleri toplanırken bu organizmaları etkileyen bazı çevresel parametreler de ölçülmüştür. Toplanan örneklerin değerlendirmesi sonucunda 40 Rotifera türü tespit edilirken Kayalıköy Barajı’nda yıllık ortalama 27938 ± 18992 birey/m3 tespit edilmiştir. En fazla birey sonbahar mevsiminde (42966 birey/m3) ve 2. istasyonda (33487 birey/m3); en az birey Kış mevsiminde (1474 birey/m3) ve 1. istasyonda bulunmuştur (24850 birey/m3). Baraj gölünde Brachionus quadridentatus, Keratella cochlearis, K. quadrata, Synchaeta pectinata, Asplanchna priodonta, Polyarthra vulgaris ve Filinia longiseta türleri en yaygın türler olarak tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye su kalite standartlarına göre Kayalıköy Barajı’nın su kalitesi genel olarak I. sınıf ve A1 kalitesinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Baraj gölünde tespit edilen Rotifera türlerinin yapısı, dağılımı ve gölde ölçülen çevresel parametreler birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Gölün oligomesotrofik karakterde ve içme, tarımsal sulama ve su ürünleri yetiştiriciliği için uygun suya sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜHER, H., ÖTERLER, B. (2020). Seasonal Distribution of Rotifera Compositions and Abundance in Kayalıköy Reservoir (Kırklareli/Turkey). Acta Aquatica Turcica, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 246–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/18371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous, (2015). Yüzeysel Su Kalitesi Yönetimi Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı: Resmî Gazete, 15 Nisan 2015, Sayı: 29327. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150415-18.htm. Anonymous, (2019). İçme Suyu Temin Edilen Suların Kalitesi Ve Arıtılması Hakkında Yönetmelik. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı: Resmî Gazete, 6 Temmuz 2019, Sayı: 30823. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/07/20190706-8.htm.
  2. Arrignon, J. (1976). Aménagement ecologique et piscicole des eaux douces. Bordas, 32 p, Paris. Ayvaz, M., Tenekecioğlu, T. & Koru, E. (2011). Avşar Baraj Gölü'nün (Manisa-Türkiye) Trofik Statüsünün Belirlenmesi. Ekoloji, 20 (81): 37-47.
  3. Berzins, B. & Pejler, B. (1987). Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH. Hydrobiologia, 147: 107-116. Bozkurt A. & Sagat, Y. (2008). Birecik Baraj Gölü Zooplanktonunun Vertikal dağılımı. Journal of Fisheries Sciences.com, 2 (3): 332-342.
  4. Buyurgan, Ö., Altındağ, A. & Kaya, M. (2010). Zooplankton community structure of Asartepe Dam Lake (Ankara, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10: 135-138.
  5. Dauba, F. (1981). Etude comperative de la fauna des poissons dans les ecosystemes de deux reservoirs, Luzech (Lut) et Chastang (Dordogone): These de troisieme cycle L’Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 179 p. De Manuel Barrabın, J. (2000). The Rotifers of Spanish Reservoirs: Ecological, Systematical and Zoogeographical Remarks. Limnetica, 19, 91-167.
  6. Dorak, Z. (2019). A preliminary study on using rotifera fauna to determine the trophic level of the Buyukcekmece Reservoir (İstanbul, Turkey). Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(4), 103-111.
  7. Dorak, Z., Köker, L., Gaygusuz, Ö., Gürevin, C., Akçaalan, R. & Albay, M. (2019). Zooplankton biodiversity in reservoirs of different geographical regions of Turkey: composition and distribution related with some environmental conditions. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(1), 29-38. Edmondson W. T, (1959). Methods and Equipment in Freshwater biology 2nd ed. John Willey and Sons. Inc., NewYork, 420-1202.
  8. Geller, W. & Müller, H. (1981). The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia, 49: 316-321.
  9. Güher, H. & Çolak, Ş. (2015). Süloğlu Baraj Gölünün (Edirne) zooplankton (Rotifera, Cladocera, Copepoda) faunası ve mevsimsel değişimi. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 16(1), 17-24.
  10. Güher, H. (2019). Diversity and Abundance of Rotifera in Kadı