Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Biological influence of cry1Ab gene insertion on the endophytic bacteria community in transgenic rice

Pages
231–239
Publication Date
2018-06-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study broaden our understanding of unexpected transgenic influences on nontarget organisms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The commercial release of genetically modified (GMO) rice for insect control in China is a subject of debate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Population-level investigation suggested that cry1Ab gene insertion influenced to a varying degree the rice endophytes at the seedling stage, but a significant difference was only observed in leaves of Bt22 (Zhejiang22 transgenic rice) between the GMO and wild-type rice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study broaden our understanding of unexpected transgenic influences on nontarget organisms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:16S rRNA · community structure · endophytes

Abstract

The commercial release of genetically modified (GMO) rice for insect control in China is a subject of debate. Although a series of studies have focused on the safety evaluation of the agroecosystem, the endophytes of transgenic rice are rarely considered. Here, the influence of endophyte populations and communities was investigated and compared for transgenic and nontransgenic rice. Population-level investigation suggested that cry1Ab gene insertion influenced to a varying degree the rice endophytes at the seedling stage, but a significant difference was only observed in leaves of Bt22 (Zhejiang22 transgenic rice) between the GMO and wild-type rice. Community-level analysis using the 16S rRNA gene showed that strains of the phyla Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the predominant groups occurring in the three transgenic rice plants and their corresponding parents. By contrast, the endophytic communities of Minghui63 and Xiushui11 showed a weaker response to cry1Ab gene insertion than did Zhejiang22, and the community results were consistent with the population-level investigation. The populations and communities of rice endophytes were affected by the cry1Ab gene to a different extent in different rice varieties and plant tissues. The results of this study broaden our understanding of unexpected transgenic influences on nontarget organisms.

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, X., CAI, M., ZHOU, Y. (2018). Biological influence of cry1Ab gene insertion on the endophytic bacteria community in transgenic rice. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 231–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/181347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ansari MR, Shaheen T, Bukhari SA, Husnain T (2015). Genetic improvement of rice for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Turk J Bot 39: 911-919.
  2. Bevilacqua M, Marini F (2014). Local classification: locally weighted- partial least squares-discriminant analysis (LW-PLS-DA). Anal Chim Acta 838: 20-30.
  3. Brosius J, Palmer ML, Kennedy PJ, Noller HF (1978). Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. P Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 4801-4805.
  4. Bruto M, Prigent-Combaret C, Muller D, Moenne-Loccoz Y (2014). Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. Sci Rep 4: 6261. Chen M, Shelton A, Ye GY (2011). Insect-resistant genetically modified rice in China: from research to commercialization. Annu Rev Endomol 56: 81-101.
  5. Chen Q, Yang B, Liu X, Chen F, Ge F (2017). Long-term cultivation of Bt rice expressing the Cry1Ab/1Ac gene reduced phytoparasitic nematode abundance but did not affect other nematode parameters in paddy fields. Sci Total Environ 607-608: 463-474.
  6. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed- Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM et al. (2009). The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D141- 145. Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D (2008). An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164: 853-880.
  7. Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EM (2002). Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20: 567-574.
  8. Feng Y, Shen D, Song W (2006). Rice endophyte Pantoea agglomerans YS19 promotes host plant growth and affects allocations of host photosynthates. J Appl Microbiol 100: 938-945.
  9. FAO (2008). FAO and Sustainable Intensification of Rice Production for Food Security. Rome, Italy: FAO. Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucl Acid S 96: 95-98.
  10. Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Rodríguez-Kábana R, Kloepper JW (1998). Interactions between Meloidogyne incognita and endophytic bacteria in cotton and cucumber. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 925-937.
  11. Khush GS (2005). What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 59: 1-6.
  12. Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA (2012). Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllospher