SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2016 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECTS OF TWIN-ROW PLANTING PATTERN AND PLANT POPULATION ON SEED YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SOYBEAN AT LATE DOUBLE-CROPPED PLANTING IN CUKUROVA REGION

Leyla GULLUOGLU
Halil BAKAL
Halis ARIOGLU
Pages
60–66
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The yield increase was 24.5% more than conventional single-row planting pattern (standard).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted at the experimental area of Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University in 2013 and 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this study was to determine the influence of planting pattern and plant population on seed yield and yield components of soybean at late double-cropped (after 15th of July) planting in Cukurova region, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The yield increase was 24.5% more than conventional single-row planting pattern (standard).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Double-cropped · Plant population · Planting pattern

Abstract

This study was conducted at the experimental area of Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University in 2013 and 2014. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of planting pattern and plant population on seed yield and yield components of soybean at late double-cropped (after 15th of July) planting in Cukurova region, Turkey. The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The Atakisi (maturity group III) variety was used as a plant material in this research. The planting pattern was used as twin-row and conventional single-row. The row spacing was 70 x 25 x 70 cm, 75 x 25 x 75 cm and 80 x 25 x 80 cm for twin-row and 70 cm for single-row pattern. Intra-row spacing of 3, 4, 5 and 6 cm was arranged for different plants population. In this research, the plant populations varied between 31.6 and 69.9 plants m-2 . According to a two-year average, the highest seed yield (4906 kg ha-1 ) was obtained from 80 x 25 x 80 x 3 cm (63.2 plants m-1 ) twin-row planting pattern while the yield was 3940 kg ha-1 in single-row planting pattern as 70 x 4 cm (35.7 plants m-1 ). The yield increase was 24.5% more than conventional single-row planting pattern (standard).

🔖

Cite This Article

GULLUOGLU, L., BAKAL, H., ARIOGLU, H. (2016). THE EFFECTS OF TWIN-ROW PLANTING PATTERN AND PLANT POPULATION ON SEED YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SOYBEAN AT LATE DOUBLE-CROPPED PLANTING IN CUKUROVA REGION. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 60–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/180795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akond, A. G., M. Bobby, R. Bazzelle, W. Clark, S. K. Kantartzi, K. Meksem, and A. Kassem. 2013. Effect of Two Row Spaces on Several Agronomic Traits in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Atlas J. of Plant Biology 1(2):18-23 Anonymous. 2014a. The Year Book of Turkish Statistical Institute. Ankara Anonymous. 2014b. The Meteorological Data for Adana. The Turkish State Meteorological Service Adana Regional Directorship, 2013 and 2014.
  2. Arioglu, H. H. 2014. The Oil Crops Growing and Breeding. The Puplication of University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty number: 220, Book Number:A-70, 204 p. Adana-Turkey Aslam, M., A.K. Naseer, M. Siddique Mirza and Naeemullah. 1993. Effect of Different Row and Plant Spacings on Soybean Yield and Its Components. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 14(2-3):143- 148 Bell, A. 2005. Higher Yields With Twin-row Soybean. Delta Farm Press, November 14, 2005
  3. Bellaloui, N, H. A.Bruns, H. K. Abbas, A. Mengistu, D. K. Fisher and K. R. Reddy. 2015. Agricultural Practices Altered Soybean Seed Protein, Oil, Fatty Acids, Sugars, and Minerals in the Mid-south USA. Front Plant Science 6:31, Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00031 Bruns, H. A. 2011.
  4. Planting Date, Rate, and Twin-Row vs. Single-Row Soybean in the Mid-South. Agronomy J. 103 (5): 1308-1313
  5. Caliskan, S., M. Arslan, I. Uremis and M. E. Caliskan. 2007. The Effect of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Component of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean. Turk J. Agric For. 31: 147-154
  6. Cox, W. J., and J. H. Cherney. 2011. Growth and Yield Responses of Soybean to Row Spacing and Seeding Rate. Agronomy J. 03 (1): 123-128
  7. Dapaah, H. K., S. A. Ennin and J. N. Asafu-Agyei. 2005. Soybean Management for Increased Production: Effects of Plant Population Density and Planting Method. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. NARS Edn No.1: 43-48
  8. Egli, D. B. 1988. Plant Density and Soybean Yield. Crop Sci. 28:977-981
  9. El-Zeadani, H., A. B. Putch, M. M. A. Mondal, A. Selamat, Z. A. Ahmad and M. M. Shalgam. 2014.
  10. Seed Growth Rate, Seed Filling Period and Yield Responses of Soybean (Glycine max) to Plant Densities at Specific Reproductive Growth Stages. International J. of Agriculture and Biology 16 (5):923-928
  11. Hosseini, N. M., R. H. Ellis and B. Yazdi-Samadi. 2001. Effects of Plant Population Density on Yield and Yield Components of Eight Isolines of cv. Clark (Glycine max L.). J. Agric. Sci.Technol. 3: 131-139
  12. Ikeda, T. 1992. Soybean Planting Patterns in relation to Yield and Yield Component. Agronomy J. 84 (6) 923-926
  13. Koger, C. 2007. E