Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2017 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

LIGHT INTERCEPTION, RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY AND BIOMASS ACCUMULATION RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT UNDER DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONS

Pages
134–142
Publication Date
2017-05-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, our study demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to alleviate the drought adversities on maize (Zea mays L.)biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency (RUE), a field study was conducted under drought stress levels of D1 = well-watered, D2 = drought stress at blister stage, D3 = drought stress at blister and dough stages; and integrated nutrition levels, N0 = control, N1 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 , N2 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1 , N3 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1 , N4 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 , N5 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1 , N6 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1 .
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drought stress caused a significant decline in growth traits, interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), RUE and finally biomass production.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, our study demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drought · radiation use efficiency · intercepted PAR

Abstract

In order to alleviate the drought adversities on maize (Zea mays L.)biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency (RUE), a field study was conducted under drought stress levels of D1 = well-watered, D2 = drought stress at blister stage, D3 = drought stress at blister and dough stages; and integrated nutrition levels, N0 = control, N1 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 , N2 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1 , N3 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1 , N4 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 , N5 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1 , N6 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1 . Drought stress caused a significant decline in growth traits, interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), RUE and finally biomass production. The highest leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, interception of PAR and dry matter accumulation was recorded in plants applied with NPK (250-120-125 kg ha-1 ) in combination with FYM (15 t ha-1 ), whereas only NPK application did not significantly improve light interception and dry biomass production. Fraction of intercepted (Fi) radiation was significantly improved by integrated nutrient management under well-watered as well as drought stress conditions. A substantial decrease in total dry matter and grain yield basis RUE was recorded from higher to lower plant nutrition rates, as the highest value of RUE was found with treated plants of 250-120-125 kg NPK ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1 . Thus, our study demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.

Özet

In order to alleviate the drought adversities on maize (Zea mays L.)biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency (RUE), a field study was conducted under drought stress levels of D1 = well-watered, D2 = drought stress at blister stage, D3 = drought stress at blister and dough stages; and integrated nutrition levels, N0 = control, N1 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1, N2 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1, N3 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1, N4 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1, N5 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1, N6 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1. Drought stress caused a significant decline in growth traits, interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), RUE and finally biomass production. The highest leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, interception of PAR and dry matter accumulation was recorded in plants applied with NPK (250-120-125 kg ha-1) in combination with FYM (15 t ha-1), whereas only NPK application did not significantly improve light interception and dry biomass production. Fraction of intercepted (Fi) radiation was significantly improved by integrated nutrient management under well-watered as well as drought stress conditions. A substantial decrease in total dry matter and grain yield basis RUE was recorded from higher to lower plant nutrition rates, as the highest value of RUE was found with treated plants of 250-120-125 kg NPK ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1. Thus, our study demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.

🔖

Cite This Article

RANDHAWA, M. S., MAQSOOD, M., SHEHZAD, M. A., CHATTHA, M. U., CHATTHA, M. B., NAWAZ, F., YASIN, S., ABBAS, T., NAWAZ, M. M., KHAN, R. D., ZULFIQAR, U. (2017). LIGHT INTERCEPTION, RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY AND BIOMASS ACCUMULATION RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT UNDER DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 134–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/180791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akmal, M., Hameed-ur-rehman, Farhatullah, M. Asim and H. Akbar. 2010. Response of maize varieties to nitrogen application for leaf area profile, crop growth, yield and yield components. Pak. J. Bot. 42: 1941-1947.
  2. Ali, K., M. Arif, S. Shah, Z. Hussain, A. Ali, S. Munir and H. Sher. 2015. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrients sources on phenology and growth of wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 47: 2215-2222.
  3. Azam, M., A. Hussain, S.A. Wajid and M. Maqsood. 2002. Effect of sowing date, irrigation and plant densities on radiation interception and its utilization efficiency in lentils. Int. J. Agric. & Biol. 04: 217-219.
  4. Bat-Oyun, T., M. Shinoda and M. Tsubo. 2011. Effects of water and temperature stresses on radiation use efficiency in a semiarid grassland. J. Plant Interact. 7:214-224.
  5. Beadle, C.L. 1987. Plant growth analysis. In techniques in bio-productivity and photosynthesis. 2nd ed. Edited by Coomlos, J.D.O. Hall, S.P. Long and J.M.O. Scurlock. Pergamon press, Oxford, New York. PP. 21-23.
  6. Crecchio, C., M. Curci., R. Mininni., P. Ricciuti and P. Ruggiero, 2001. Short term effects of municipal solid waste compost amendments on soil carbon and nitrogen content, some enzyme activities and genetic diversity. Biol. Fert. Soils. 34: 311-318.
  7. Farooq, M., A. Wahid, N. Kobayashi, D. Fujita and S.M.A. Basra. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29: 185-212.
  8. Gustav, O.A., I. Pereyra, V. Luciano, L. Leandra and L.A.N. Aguirrezabal. 2008. Genetic variability for leaf growth rate and duration under water deficit in sunflower: analysis of responses at cell, organ, and plant level. J. Exp. Bot. 59: 2221-2232.
  9. Hamzei, J. and J. Soltani. 2012. Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: Effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric. Ecosys and Environ. 155: 153-160.
  10. Hayatu, M., S.Y. Muhammad and U.A. Habibu. 2014. Effect of water stress on the leaf relative water content and yield of some cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L) Walp.) genotype. Int. J. Sci. & Technol. Res. 3: 148-152.
  11. Hussein, M.M., M.M. Shaaban., A.M. El-Saady and A.A. El-Sayed. 2011. Growth and photosynthetic pigments of fodder beet plants as affected by water regime and boron foliar fertilization. Nature Sci. 9: 72-79.
  12. Ibrahim, L., M.F. Proe and A.D. Cameron. 1997. Main effects of nitrogen supply and drought stress upon whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1413-1419.
  13. Jones, H.G.