Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2017 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

GREEN HERBAGE YIELD ASSESSMENTS OF MAIZE CULTIVARS THROUGH GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS METHOD

Pages
235–242
Publication Date
2017-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Safak (G18), 30B74 (G2), Seme Kukuruza 877 (G22), ADV 2898 (G24) and Wayne (G17) cultivars can be use green herbage yield production in south eastern Anatolia will allow the growers to have a profitable production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to assess green herbage yields of hybrid maize cultivars grown under different environments for two years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:GGE biplot analysis method and regression coefficients were used to assess genotype x environment interaction and to identify the most stable cultivars for green herbage yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Safak (G18), 30B74 (G2), Seme Kukuruza 877 (G22), ADV 2898 (G24) and Wayne (G17) cultivars can be use green herbage yield production in south eastern Anatolia will allow the growers to have a profitable production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:environment · GGE biplot · hybrid maize

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess green herbage yields of hybrid maize cultivars grown under different environments for two years. GGE biplot analysis method and regression coefficients were used to assess genotype x environment interaction and to identify the most stable cultivars for green herbage yield. Experiments were conducted in six different environments, green herbage yields in the environments varied between 6.0 t da-1 (E5) and 10.4 t da-1 (E1) and green herbage yield yields of the cultivars varied between 6.8 t da-1 (G14) and 10.9 t da-1 (G18). In GGE biplot analysis, the first two principle component (PC) axis explained about 82.45% of total variation. The genotypes with high PC1 and low PC2 values and regression coefficient of 1.0 were assessed as stable. The cultivar Safak (G18) with such values was identified as the most stable cultivar. The regression coefficient of 1.0 and the greatest green herbage yield proved the stability of that cultivar. The cultivars with higher PC1 and lower PC2 values [30B74 (G2), Seme Kukuruza 877 (G22), ADV 2898 (G24), Wayne (G17), and Safak (G18)] generally had higher green herbage yield than the general average. Safak (G18), 30B74 (G2), Seme Kukuruza 877 (G22), ADV 2898 (G24) and Wayne (G17) cultivars can be use green herbage yield production in south eastern Anatolia will allow the growers to have a profitable production.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOKTEN, K., KAPLAN, M., AKCURA, M. (2017). GREEN HERBAGE YIELD ASSESSMENTS OF MAIZE CULTIVARS THROUGH GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS METHOD. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 235–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/180740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akcura, M., Taner, S. and Kaya, Y. 2011. Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes under irrigated multi-environment conditions using GGE biplot analyses. Agriculture, 98(1), 35-40.
  2. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner and R. Ayranci. 2006. Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environ. 52:254-261.
  3. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya and S. Taner. 2005. Genotype-environment ınteraction and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat in Central Anatolian Region. Turkish J. Agric. For. 29:369-375.
  4. Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Joint regression vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica 94:53-62.
  5. Dehghani, H., A. Ebadi and A. Yousefi. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype x environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agron. J. 98: 388-393.
  6. Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
  7. Flores, F., M.T. Moreno and J.I. Cubero. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze environments. Field Crop Res. 56:271-286.
  8. Francis, T.R. and L.W. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short season maize 1. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:1029-1034.
  9. Gauch, G.H. and Zobel, R.W. 1988. Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 1-10.
  10. Jalata, Z. 2011. GGE-biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in Southeastern Ethiopia highlands Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 5(1):59-75.
  11. Kandus, M., D. Almorza, R. Boggio Ronceros and J.C. Salerno. 2010. Statistical models for evaluating the genotype-environment interaction in maize (Zea mays L.). Phyton (Buenos Ares) 79:39-45.
  12. Kaplan, M. 2005. Effects of different intra and inter row spacing on yield and yield components of second crop silage maize (Zea mays L.) under Kahramanmaras conditions. MSc Thesis, University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Kahramanmaras Turkey. Kaplan, M., O. Baran, A. Unlukara, H. Kale, M. Arslan, K. Kara, S. Buyukkilic Beyzi, Y. Konca and A. Ulas. 2016. The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turk J. Field Crops 2(1):100-108.
  13. Kaya, Y., M. Akcura and S. Taner. 2006. GGE-Biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in bread wheat. Turk J. Agric. 30:325-337.
  14. McDonald, P. A.R. Henderson and S.J.E. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Se