Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

The determination of pneumatic conveying characteristics of chickpea

Pages
265–274
Publication Date
2010-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mechanical damage to the chickpeas for both pipe diameters increased as the revolution of the blower increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The pneumatic conveying characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) of the variety Koçbasi were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The length, width, thickness, arithmetic mean diameter, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, volume, 1000 seed mass, bulk density, true density, porosity, projected area, terminal velocity, drag coefficient, pressure drop, power consumption, and seed damage, namely mechanical damage, germination test, and seed vigour index, were investigated experimentally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mechanical damage to the chickpeas for both pipe diameters increased as the revolution of the blower increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Pneumatic conveying · positive low pressure system · chickpea

Abstract

The pneumatic conveying characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) of the variety Koçbasi were determined. The length, width, thickness, arithmetic mean diameter, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, volume, 1000 seed mass, bulk density, true density, porosity, projected area, terminal velocity, drag coefficient, pressure drop, power consumption, and seed damage, namely mechanical damage, germination test, and seed vigour index, were investigated experimentally. The positive low pressure system was used for the conveying of chickpeas. The power requirement and pressure drop were boosted with increasing the revolution of the blower and conveying capacity decreased with increasing pipe diameter. The highest pressure drop and power requirement were obtained for 54.5 mm pipe diameter, while the lowest pressure drop was found for 70.3 mm pipe diameter. The mechanical damage to the chickpeas for both pipe diameters increased as the revolution of the blower increased.

Özet

The pneumatic conveying characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) of the variety Koçbasi were determined. The length, width, thickness, arithmetic mean diameter, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, volume, 1000 seed mass, bulk density, true density, porosity, projected area, terminal velocity, drag coefficient, pressure drop, power consumption, and seed damage, namely mechanical damage, germination test, and seed vigour index, were investigated experimentally. The positive low pressure system was used for the conveying of chickpeas. The power requirement and pressure drop were boosted with increasing the revolution of the blower and conveying capacity decreased with increasing pipe diameter. The highest pressure drop and power requirement were obtained for 54.5 mm pipe diameter, while the lowest pressure drop was found for 70.3 mm pipe diameter. The mechanical damage to the chickpeas for both pipe diameters increased as the revolution of the blower increased.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇKAN, A., GÜNER, M. (2010). The determination of pneumatic conveying characteristics of chickpea. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 265–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/180339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AOSD (1981) Rules for testing seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts. Journal of Seed Technology 5: 5-116.
  2. ASAE (1992) Moisture Measurement – Unground Grain and Seeds. Standards 352.2, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA. Chillo S, Laverse J, Falcone PM, Del Nobile MA (2008) Quality of spaghetti in base amaranthus wholemeal flour added with quinoa, broad bean and chick pea. Journal of Food Engineering 84: 101-107.
  3. Çalışır S, Marakoğlu T, Öğüt H, Öztürk Ö (2005a) Physical properties of rapeseed (Brassica napus oleifera L.). Journal of Food Engineering 69: 61-66.
  4. Çalışır S, Özcan M, Haciseferoğlu H, Yıldız MU (2005b) A study on some physico- chemical properties of Turkey okra (Hibiscus esculenta L.) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering 68: 73-78.
  5. Çalışır S, Haciseferoğlu H, Özcan M, Arslan D (2005c) Some nutritional and technological properties of wild plum (Prunus spp.) fruits in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 66: 233-237.
  6. FAO statistic (2007) http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault. aspx?PageID=567# ancor, 10.02.2008.
  7. Güner M, Dursun E, Dursun IG (2003) Mechanical behavior of hazelnut under compression loading. Biosystems Engineering 85: 485-491.
  8. Güner M (2005) Determination of pneumatic conveying characteristics of some agricultural materials. TÜBİTAK project, Project code: TOGTAG 3258, Ankara,
  9. Turkey. Güner M (2006) Pneumatic conveying characteristics of some agricultural seeds. Journal of Food Engineering 80: 904-913.
  10. Haciseferoğlu H, Özcan M, Demir F, Çalışır S (2005) Some nutritional and technological properties of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Food Engineering 68: 463-469.
  11. Hauch D (2005) Measurement of air velocity. http://www.bulk- online.com/Forum/showthread.php?threadid=5190, 16 April. Hellevang KJ (1985) Pneumatic grain conveyors. Cooperative Extension Service, North Dakota State University. North Dakota USA. ISTA (1985)
  12. International rules for seed testing, International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Seed Science and Technology 13: 307-520.
  13. Jain RK, Bal S (1997) Physical properties of pearl millet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66: 85-91.
  14. Kılıçkan A, Güner M (2006) Pneumatic conveying characteristics of cotton seeds. Biosystems Engineering 95: 537-546.
  15. Konak M, Çarman K, Aydın C (2002) Physical properties of chickpea seeds. Biosystems Engineering 82: 73-78.
  16. Kural H, Çarman K (1997) Aerodynamic properties of seed crops. National Symposium on Mechanisation in Agriculture Turkey, pp.615-623.
  17. Mohsenin NN (1970)