SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5

Stability of Grain Vitreousness in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L. Desf.) Genotypes in the North-Western Region of Turkey

Kayıhan Zahit KORKUT
Oğuz BİLGİN
İsmet BAŞER
Nezihi SAĞLAM
Pages
313–318
Publication Date
2007-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Svevo, Amanos 97, Zenit, Gediz 75, Ankara 98, Mirzabey, and Fuatbey 2000 varieties could be used as progenitors in future breeding programmes due to their high grain vitreousness potentials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out in order to determine the grain vitreousness percentage and stability performance of 44 durum wheat genotypes, which were tested in 3 different environments during 2 growing periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Grain vitreousness percentage of the genotypes ranged between 69.2% and 90.0%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Svevo, Amanos 97, Zenit, Gediz 75, Ankara 98, Mirzabey, and Fuatbey 2000 varieties could be used as progenitors in future breeding programmes due to their high grain vitreousness potentials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adaptation · durum wheat · genotype x environment interaction

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to determine the grain vitreousness percentage and stability performance of 44 durum wheat genotypes, which were tested in 3 different environments during 2 growing periods. Grain vitreousness percentage of the genotypes ranged between 69.2% and 90.0%. Svevo, Amanos 97, and Zenit varieties had the highest vitreousness kernel percentages and the lowest grain yields. The negative correlation coefficient between vitreous grain percentage and grain yield, according to correlation analysis, confirms this result. Mutant 47, Harran 95, Epidur, and Kızıltan 95 were the most stable genotypes with respect to all stability parameters studied for vitreousness. Therefore, they can be recommended for profitable grain yield and consistent quality durum wheat production in the north-western region of Turkey. Svevo, Amanos 97, Zenit, Gediz 75, Ankara 98, Mirzabey, and Fuatbey 2000 varieties could be used as progenitors in future breeding programmes due to their high grain vitreousness potentials.

Özet

This study was carried out in order to determine the grain vitreousness percentage and stability performance of 44 durum wheat genotypes, which were tested in 3 different environments during 2 growing periods. Grain vitreousness percentage of the genotypes ranged between 69.2% and 90.0%. Svevo, Amanos 97, and Zenit varieties had the highest vitreousness kernel percentages and the lowest grain yields. The negative correlation coefficient between vitreous grain percentage and grain yield, according to correlation analysis, confirms this result. Mutant 47, Harran 95, Epidur, and Kızıltan 95 were the most stable genotypes with respect to all stability parameters studied for vitreousness. Therefore, they can be recommended for profitable grain yield and consistent quality durum wheat production in the north-western region of Turkey. Svevo, Amanos 97, Zenit, Gediz 75, Ankara 98, Mirzabey, and Fuatbey 2000 varieties could be used as progenitors in future breeding programmes due to their high grain vitreousness potentials.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKUT, K. Z., BİLGİN, O., BAŞER, İ., SAĞLAM, N. (2007). Stability of Grain Vitreousness in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L. Desf.) Genotypes in the North-Western Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5, 313–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/180324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akçura, M., Y. Kaya and S. Taner. 2005. Genotype-environment interactions and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat in the Central Anatolian Region. Turk. J. Agric. For., 29: 369-375.
  2. Backer, H.C. and J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101: 1-23.
  3. Breese, E.L. 1969. The measurement and significance of genotype- environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24: 27-44.
  4. Comstock, R.E. and R. Moll. 1963. Genotype ×Environment Interactions. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (Eds. W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson). NASNRC Pub., Washington, DC, pp. 164-196.
  5. Eberhart, S.A. and W. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
  6. Finlay, S.A. and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754.
  7. Grausgruber, H., M. Oberforster, M. Werteker, P. Ruckenbauer and J. Vollmann. 2000. Stability of quality traits in Austrian-grown winter wheats. Field Crops Res., 66:257-267.
  8. Hadjichristodoulou, A. 1979. Genetic and environmental effects on vitreousness of durum wheat. Euphytica 28: 711-716.
  9. Hadjichristodoulou, A. 1989. Breeding cereals for consistency of performance in dry lands through stability of traits. Euphytica 28: 711-716. IACC. 1980. Method for the Determination of the Vitreousness of Durum Wheat. International Association of Cereal Chemistry, ICC Standard No: 129. Kara, Ş.M. 2000. Bazı ekmeklik buğday genotiplerinde adaptasyon ve stabilite analizleri. Turk. J. Agric. For. 24: 413-419.
  10. Korkut, K.Z., İ. Başer. 1993. Ekmeklik buğdayda genotip x çevre interaksiyonu ve tane veriminin stabilitesi üzerine araştırmalar. Tekirdağ Zir. Fak. Der. 2: 63-68.
  11. Kruger, J.E., R.B. Matsuo and J.W. Dick. 1996. Pasta and Noodle Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., Minnesota, USA. Mart, D. and E. Anlarsal. 2001. Çukurova koşullarında nohutta (Cicer arietinum L.) bazı önemli özellikler yönünden genotip x çevre interaksiyonları ve uyum yeteneklerinin saptanması üzerine bir araştırma. Türkiye 4. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 17-21
  12. Eylül, Tekirdağ, s. 321-326.
  13. Obuchowski, W. 1997. Technologia Przemyslowej Produkcji Makaronu. AR, Poznan, Poland. Pekin, F. and Ü. Çakmaklı. 1987. Bazı Türk ıslah çeşidi makarnalık buğdayların kimi teknolojik ve renk özellikleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Türkiye Tahıl Simpozyumu, 6-9 Ekim Bursa, 527-534.
  14. Peterson, C.J., P.S. Graybosch, P.S. Baenziger and A.W. Grombacher. 1992. Genotype and en