Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5

Determination of Irrigation Performance of Water User Associations in the Vicinity of Sarıgöl and Alaşehir Using Remote Sensing Techniques

Pages
287–296
Publication Date
2007-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this purpose, the performance of the irrigation system for the 2004 irrigation season (May to September) was determined according to 5 indicators, namely overall consumed ratio (ep), relative water supply (RWS), depleted fraction (DF), crop water deficit (CWD), and relative evapotranspiration (RET).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research was to determine the irrigation performance of Sarıgöl, Bağ, and Üzüm Water User Associations (WUAs) in the vicinity of Sarıgöl and Alaşehir using remote sensing techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the performance of the irrigation system for the 2004 irrigation season (May to September) was determined according to 5 indicators, namely overall consumed ratio (ep), relative water supply (RWS), depleted fraction (DF), crop water deficit (CWD), and relative evapotranspiration (RET).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, performance indicators showed that less irrigation water was supplied to WUAs than was needed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Irrigation performance · remote sensing · SEBAL

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the irrigation performance of Sarıgöl, Bağ, and Üzüm Water User Associations (WUAs) in the vicinity of Sarıgöl and Alaşehir using remote sensing techniques. For this purpose, the performance of the irrigation system for the 2004 irrigation season (May to September) was determined according to 5 indicators, namely overall consumed ratio (ep), relative water supply (RWS), depleted fraction (DF), crop water deficit (CWD), and relative evapotranspiration (RET). Potential and actual evapotranspiration parameters used in determining these indicators were estimated according to the SEBAL (Surface Energy Balance) method using NOAA-16/AVHRR images. Seasonal averages of Sarıgöl, Bağ, and Üzüm WUAs calculated from the results were, respectively, 0.82, 0.88, and 1.26 for ep; 1.21, 1.13, and 0.94 for RWS; 0.53, 0.59, and 0.68 for DF; 45.61, 42.44, and 45.81 mm month-1 for CWD; and 0.64, 0.67, and 0.64 for RET. According to the seasonal average values of all the performance indicators, the irrigation performance of all WUAs was usually poor, and only the depleted fraction indicator for Üzüm WUA was within the range of acceptability. Thus, performance indicators showed that less irrigation water was supplied to WUAs than was needed.

Özet

The aim of this research was to determine the irrigation performance of Sarıgöl, Bağ, and Üzüm Water User Associations (WUAs) in the vicinity of Sarıgöl and Alaşehir using remote sensing techniques. For this purpose, the performance of the irrigation system for the 2004 irrigation season (May to September) was determined according to 5 indicators, namely overall consumed ratio (ep), relative water supply (RWS), depleted fraction (DF), crop water deficit (CWD), and relative evapotranspiration (RET). Potential and actual evapotranspiration parameters used in determining these indicators were estimated according to the SEBAL (Surface Energy Balance) method using NOAA-16/AVHRR images. Seasonal averages of Sarıgöl, Bağ, and Üzüm WUAs calculated from the results were, respectively, 0.82, 0.88, and 1.26 for ep; 1.21, 1.13, and 0.94 for RWS; 0.53, 0.59, and 0.68 for DF; 45.61, 42.44, and 45.81 mm month-1 for CWD; and 0.64, 0.67, and 0.64 for RET. According to the seasonal average values of all the performance indicators, the irrigation performance of all WUAs was usually poor, and only the depleted fraction indicator for Üzüm WUA was within the range of acceptability. Thus, performance indicators showed that less irrigation water was supplied to WUAs than was needed.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, B. S., AKKUZU, E., AVCI, M. (2007). Determination of Irrigation Performance of Water User Associations in the Vicinity of Sarıgöl and Alaşehir Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5, 287–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/180237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akkuzu, E. 2001. Aşağı Gediz Havzasındaki Bazı Sulama Sistemlerinin Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, p.138. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes and M. Smith. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Ambast, S.K, A.K. Keshari and A.K. Gosain. 2002. Satellite remote sensing to support management of irrigation systems: concepts and approaches. Irrig. Drain. 51: 25-39.
  2. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., M. Menenti, R.A. Feddes and A.A.M. Holtslag. 1998. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL), part 1: formulation. J. Hydrol. 198-213.
  3. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., S. Thiruvengadachari, R. Sakthivadivel and D.J. Molden. 1999. Satellite remote sensing for estimating productivities of land and water. Int. J. Water Resour. D. 15: 181-196.
  4. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., R.A.L. Brito, M.G. Bos, R.A. Souza, E.B. Cavalcanti and M.M. Bakker. 2001. Low cost satellite data for monthly irrigation performance monitoring: benchmarks from Nilo Coelho, Brazil. Irrigation and Drainage Systems. (15): 53-79.
  5. Bos, M.G. and J. Nugteren. 1990. On Irrigation Efficiencies. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI). ILRI Publication 19. Wageningen. Bos, M.G., W. Wolters, A. Drovandi, and J.A. Morabito. 1991. The Viejo Retamo secondary canal performance evaluation case study: Mendoza, Argentina. Irrigation and Drainage Systems (5): 77-88.
  6. Bos, M.G. 1997. Performance indicators for irrigation and drainage. Irrigation and Drainage Systems. 11: 119-137.
  7. Bos, M.G., M.A. Burton and D.J. Molden. 2005. Irrigation and Drainage Performance Assessment: Practical Guidelines. CABI Publishing. Trowbridge, UK. Droogers, P., G. Kite and H. Murray-Rust. 2000. Use of simulation models to evaluate irrigation performance including water productivity, risk and system analyses. Irrigation Sci. 19: 139-14.
  8. Droogers, P. and W.G.M. Bastiaanssen. 2002. Irrigation performance using hydrological and remote sensing modeling. J. Irrig. Drain. E.-ASCE. 128: 11-18. DSİ, 1977. Planlı Su Dağıtım Rehberi. DSİ Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. 41s. DSİ, 2004. Planlı Su Dağıtım Uygulama Raporları. DSİ II. Bölge Müdürlüğü Kayıtları. DSİ, 2006. Toprak ve su kaynakları. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/topraksu. htm. Access: December 2006.
  9. Gautam, R.S., D. Singh and A. Mittal. 2006. Detection of hotspots in