Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Artificial neural networks in online semiautomated pest discriminability: an applied case with 2 Thrips species

Pages
111–124
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the use of an optimal 3-layer ANN architecture (17, 4, 1) enables fast and reliable 100% classification as proven during the extensive verification process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Being faced with practical problems in pest identification, we present a methodical paper based on artificial neural networks to discriminate morphologically very similar species, Thrips sambuci Heeger, 1854 and Thrips fuscipennis Haliday, 1836 (Thysanoptera: Thripinae), as an applied case for more general use.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistical analysis of 17 characters, measured or determined for each Thrips fuscipennis and T. sambuci specimen (reared from larvae in our laboratories), including 15 quantitative morphometric variables, was performed to elucidate morphological plasticity, detect eventual outliers, and visualize differences between the studied taxa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the use of an optimal 3-layer ANN architecture (17, 4, 1) enables fast and reliable 100% classification as proven during the extensive verification process.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Artificial neural networks · online semiautomated pest identification · Thysanoptera

Abstract

Being faced with practical problems in pest identification, we present a methodical paper based on artificial neural networks to discriminate morphologically very similar species, Thrips sambuci Heeger, 1854 and Thrips fuscipennis Haliday, 1836 (Thysanoptera: Thripinae), as an applied case for more general use. The artificially intelligent system may be successfully applied as a credible, online, semiautomated identification tool that extracts hidden information from noisy data, even when the standard characters have much overlap and the common morphological keys hint at the practical problem of high morphological plasticity. Statistical analysis of 17 characters, measured or determined for each Thrips fuscipennis and T. sambuci specimen (reared from larvae in our laboratories), including 15 quantitative morphometric variables, was performed to elucidate morphological plasticity, detect eventual outliers, and visualize differences between the studied taxa. The computational strategy applied in this study includes a set of statistical tools (factor analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and linear discriminant analysis) followed by the application of a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network system, which models functions of almost arbitrary complexity. This complex approach has proven the existence of 2 separate species: T. fuscipennis and T. sambuci. All the specimens could be clearly distinguished with 2 distinct subgroups for each species, determined by sex. In conclusion, the use of an optimal 3-layer ANN architecture (17, 4, 1) enables fast and reliable 100% classification as proven during the extensive verification process.

Özet

Being faced with practical problems in pest identification, we present a methodical paper based on artificial neural networks to discriminate morphologically very similar species, Thrips sambuci Heeger, 1854 and Thrips fuscipennis Haliday, 1836 (Thysanoptera: Thripinae), as an applied case for more general use. The artificially intelligent system may be successfully applied as a credible, online, semiautomated identification tool that extracts hidden information from noisy data, even when the standard characters have much overlap and the common morphological keys hint at the practical problem of high morphological plasticity. Statistical analysis of 17 characters, measured or determined for each Thrips fuscipennis and T. sambuci specimen (reared from larvae in our laboratories), including 15 quantitative morphometric variables, was performed to elucidate morphological plasticity, detect eventual outliers, and visualize differences between the studied taxa. The computational strategy applied in this study includes a set of statistical tools (factor analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and linear discriminant analysis) followed by the application of a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network system, which models functions of almost arbitrary complexity. This complex approach has proven the existence of 2 separate species: T. fuscipennis and T. sambuci. All the specimens could be clearly distinguished with 2 distinct subgroups for each species, determined by sex. In conclusion, the use of an optimal 3-layer ANN architecture (17, 4, 1) enables fast and reliable 100% classification as proven during the extensive verification process.

🔖

Cite This Article

FEDOR, P., PEÑA-MÉNDEZ, E. M., KUCHARCZYK, H., VAŇHARA, J., HAVEL, J., DORIČOVÁ, M., PROKOP, P. (2014). Artificial neural networks in online semiautomated pest discriminability: an applied case with 2 Thrips species. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 111–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/180150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aldrich BT, Magirang EB, Dowell FE, Kambhampati S (2007). Identification of termite species and subspecies of the genus Zootermopsis using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Insect Sci 7: 18. Ananthakrishnan TN (2005). Perspectives and dimensions of phenotypic plasticity in insects. In: Ananthakrishnan TN, Whitman D, editors. Insect Phenotypic Plasticity: Diversity of Responses. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers, pp. 1–23.
  2. Apuan DA, Torres MAJ, Demayo CG (2010). Describing variations and taxonomic status of earthworms collected from selected areas in Misamis Oriental, Philippines using principal component and parsimony analysis. Egypt Acad J Biolog Sci B Zoology 2: 27–36.
  3. Bilgili M (2011). The use of artificial neural networks for forecasting the monthly mean soil temperatures in Adana, Turkey. Turk J Agric For 35: 83–93.
  4. Brunner PC, Fleming C, Frey JE (2002). A molecular identification key for economically important thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) using direct sequencing and a PCR-RFLP-based approach. Agr Forest Entomol 4: 127–136.
  5. Chiapella J (2000). The Deschampsia cespitosa complex in central and northern Europe: morphological analysis. Bot J Linn Soc 134: 495–512.
  6. Clark JY (2003). Artificial neural networks for species identification by taxonomists. Biosystems 72: 131–147.
  7. Do MT, Harp JM, Norris KC (1999). A test of a pattern recognition system for identification of spiders. B Entomol Res 89: 217–224.
  8. Esteban LG, Fernández FG, de Palacios P, Romero RM, Cano NN (2009). Artificial neural networks in wood identification: the case of two Juniperus species from the Canary islands. IAWA J 30: 87–94.
  9. Fausett L (1994). Fundamentals of Neural Networks: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Prentice Hall. Fedor P, Malenovskı I, Vaňhara J, Sierka W, Havel J (2008). Thrips (Thysanoptera) identification using artificial neural networks. B Entomol Res 98: 437–447.
  10. Fedor P, Vaňhara J, Havel J, Malenovskı I, Spellerberg I (2009). Artificial intelligence in pest insect monitoring. Syst Entomol 34: 398–400.
  11. Frantz G, Mellinger HC (1997). THRIPS, a computerized knowledgebase for the identification and management of Thrips infesting vegetables in the United States. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 128: 1–4.
  12. Freeman JA, Skapura DM (1992). Neural Network: Algorithm, Applications, and Programming Techniques. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley. Gaston KJ, O’Neill MA (2004). Automated species identification: why not? Philos T Roy Soc B 359: 65