Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Xanthium strumarium L. impact on corn yield and yield components

Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increasing densities of either crop or weed generally delayed silking and decreased yield and yield components due to inter- and intraspecific competition, suggesting that increasing crop density will likely not be effective in suppressing X. strumarium and making up for possible yield loss in corn.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Xanthium strumarium L. is a major weed affecting flour corn in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 evaluated corn yield and yield component responses to competition from X. strumarium over a range of corn populations (5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 plants m-2) and X. strumarium densities (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 plants m-2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increasing densities of either crop or weed generally delayed silking and decreased yield and yield components due to inter- and intraspecific competition, suggesting that increasing crop density will likely not be effective in suppressing X. strumarium and making up for possible yield loss in corn.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Cocklebur · corn · interference

Abstract

Xanthium strumarium L. is a major weed affecting flour corn in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan. Studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 evaluated corn yield and yield component responses to competition from X. strumarium over a range of corn populations (5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 plants m-2) and X. strumarium densities (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 plants m-2). Flour corn yield and yield components (grains ear-1, 1000-grain weight, harvest index, and days to silking) were significantly correlated with and affected by corn population, weed density, and the interaction between them. The percent reduction in grain yield was 5%-40% and fit a quadratic relationship. The number of grains ear-1 declined in a linear fashion with increasing X. strumarium density, except at the highest corn density, with an average decrease of 5%-6% in grains ear-1 for every X. strumarium plant m-2. As the X. strumarium density increased, 1000-grain weight and harvest index declined, while the number of days to silking increased slightly. Increasing densities of either crop or weed generally delayed silking and decreased yield and yield components due to inter- and intraspecific competition, suggesting that increasing crop density will likely not be effective in suppressing X. strumarium and making up for possible yield loss in corn.

Özet

Xanthium strumarium L. is a major weed affecting flour corn in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan. Studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 evaluated corn yield and yield component responses to competition from X. strumarium over a range of corn populations (5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 plants m-2) and X. strumarium densities (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 plants m-2). Flour corn yield and yield components (grains ear-1, 1000-grain weight, harvest index, and days to silking) were significantly correlated with and affected by corn population, weed density, and the interaction between them. The percent reduction in grain yield was 5%-40% and fit a quadratic relationship. The number of grains ear-1 declined in a linear fashion with increasing X. strumarium density, except at the highest corn density, with an average decrease of 5%-6% in grains ear-1 for every X. strumarium plant m-2. As the X. strumarium density increased, 1000-grain weight and harvest index declined, while the number of days to silking increased slightly. Increasing densities of either crop or weed generally delayed silking and decreased yield and yield components due to inter- and intraspecific competition, suggesting that increasing crop density will likely not be effective in suppressing X. strumarium and making up for possible yield loss in corn.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUSSAIN, Z., MARWAT, K. B., CARDINA, J., KHAN, I. A. (2014). Xanthium strumarium L. impact on corn yield and yield components. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/180146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Baldoni G, Viggiani P, Bonetti A, Dinelli G, Catezone P (2000). Classification of Italian Xanthium strumarium complex based on biological traits, electrophoretic analysis and response to maize interference. Weed Res 40: 191–204.
  2. Beckett TH, Stoller EW, Wax LM (1988). Interference of four annual weeds in corn. Weed Sci 36: 764–769.
  3. Bhatti AU (2002). Soil Fertility Status of Malakandher Farm. Soil Bulletin 6, Department of Soil and Environmental Science, NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan. Bussler BH, Maxwell BD, Puettmann KJ (1995). Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods. Weed Sci 43: 586–594.
  4. Cox WJ, Hahn RR, Stachowski PJ (2006). Time of weed removal with glyphosate affects corn growth and yield components. Agron J 98: 349–353.
  5. Dastfal M, Imam Y, Asad MT (1999). Yield and yield adjustments of non-prolific corn hybrids in response to plant population density. Iranian Agric Res 18: 139–152.
  6. David I, Kovacs I (2007). Competition of three noxious weeds with row crops. Cereal Res Communic 35: 341–344.
  7. Evans SP, Knezevic SZ, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Blankenship EE (2003). Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci 51: 408–417.
  8. Hashim S, Marwat KB (2002). Invasive weeds a threat to the biodiversity: a case study from Abbotabad district, N-W Pakistan. Pak J Weed Sci Res 8: 1–12.
  9. Iftikhar-ud-Din, Ullah G, Baloch MS, Baloch AA, Awan IU, Khan EA (2011). Effect of phosphorus and herbicides on yield and yield components of maize. Pak J Weed Sci Res 17: 1–7.
  10. Maddonni GA, Otegui ME (2004). Intra-specific competition in maize: early establishment of hierarchies among plants affects final kernel set. Field Crops Res 85: 1–13.
  11. Mehmeti A, Demaj A, Demelezi I, Rudari H (2012). Effect of postemergence herbicides on weeds and yield of maize. Pak J Weed Sci Res 18: 27–37.
  12. Memon SQ, Mirjat MS, Mughal AQ, Amjad N (2012). Evaluation of inputs and outputs energy for maize grain yield. Sarhad J Agric 28: 387–393.
  13. NeSmith DS, Ritchie JT (1992). Effects of soil water-deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield component of maize (Zea mays). Field Crops Res 28: 251–256.
  14. Pagano E, Celan S, Maddonni GA, Otegui ME (2007). Intra-specific competition in maize: ear development, flowering dynamics and kernel set of early-established plant hierarchies. Field Crops Res 102: 198–209.
  15. Pandey RK, Maranville JW, Admou A (2000). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian