Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6

Modeling temporal variability of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard in the Harran Plain of southeastern Turkey

Pages
744–761
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comparison of 3 models (multiple linear regression, principal component regression, and multivariate adaptive regression splines) showed that multivariate adaptive regression splines provided the best performance in modeling soil CO2 emissions, explaining overall variation of 64%, 56%, 76%, and 53% in CO2-AVG for the first, second, third, and all three 3 periods, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Broad interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires a better understanding of controls on carbon dioxide (CO2) release under different agricultural management practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this study was to investigate and model seasonal variation of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard field (Malus domestica L. 'Starkrimson').
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparison of 3 models (multiple linear regression, principal component regression, and multivariate adaptive regression splines) showed that multivariate adaptive regression splines provided the best performance in modeling soil CO2 emissions, explaining overall variation of 64%, 56%, 76%, and 53% in CO2-AVG for the first, second, third, and all three 3 periods, respectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Soil CO2 emission · multivariate statistical analysis · principal component analysis

Abstract

Broad interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires a better understanding of controls on carbon dioxide (CO2) release under different agricultural management practices. The objective of this study was to investigate and model seasonal variation of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard field (Malus domestica L. 'Starkrimson'). Soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard managed with common practices were measured weekly over a 3-year period (May 2008 to May 2011) from both under the crowns of trees (CO2-UC) and between rows (CO2-BR) using a soda lime technique and were modeled using available environmental data. The study area is located in the Harran Plain of southeastern Turkey and has a semiarid climate. The weekly soil CO2 emissions ranged from 87.8 to 1428 kg week-1 ha-1, from 74.6 to 835 kg week-1 ha-1, and from 88.6 to 1087 kg week-1 ha-1 for CO2-UC, CO2-BR, and the average of both (CO2-AVG), respectively, and showed a pronounced seasonal pattern with the lowest emissions in winter (January and February) and the highest emissions during the growing season (April to December). Relative to 2008 emissions, 2009 CO2 emissions increased by approximately 75%, and 2010 emissions increased by approximately 88%. Comparison of 3 models (multiple linear regression, principal component regression, and multivariate adaptive regression splines) showed that multivariate adaptive regression splines provided the best performance in modeling soil CO2 emissions, explaining overall variation of 64%, 56%, 76%, and 53% in CO2-AVG for the first, second, third, and all three 3 periods, respectively. In conclusion, overall findings showed that soil CO2 emissions could be modeled by available environmental data such as air and soil temperature.

Özet

Broad interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires a better understanding of controls on carbon dioxide (CO2) release under different agricultural management practices. The objective of this study was to investigate and model seasonal variation of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard field (Malus domestica L. 'Starkrimson'). Soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard managed with common practices were measured weekly over a 3-year period (May 2008 to May 2011) from both under the crowns of trees (CO2-UC) and between rows (CO2-BR) using a soda lime technique and were modeled using available environmental data. The study area is located in the Harran Plain of southeastern Turkey and has a semiarid climate. The weekly soil CO2 emissions ranged from 87.8 to 1428 kg week-1 ha-1, from 74.6 to 835 kg week-1 ha-1, and from 88.6 to 1087 kg week-1 ha-1 for CO2-UC, CO2-BR, and the average of both (CO2-AVG), respectively, and showed a pronounced seasonal pattern with the lowest emissions in winter (January and February) and the highest emissions during the growing season (April to December). Relative to 2008 emissions, 2009 CO2 emissions increased by approximately 75%, and 2010 emissions increased by approximately 88%. Comparison of 3 models (multiple linear regression, principal component regression, and multivariate adaptive regression splines) showed that multivariate adaptive regression splines provided the best performance in modeling soil CO2 emissions, explaining overall variation of 64%, 56%, 76%, and 53% in CO2-AVG for the first, second, third, and all three 3 periods, respectively. In conclusion, overall findings showed that soil CO2 emissions could be modeled by available environmental data such as air and soil temperature.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİLİ, A. V., YILMAZ, G., İKİNCİ, A. (2013). Modeling temporal variability of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard in the Harran Plain of southeastern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6, 744–761. https://ajindex.com/articles/180143

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akburak S, Makineci E (2013). Temporal changes of soil respiration under different tree species. Environ Monit Assess 185: 3349– 33 Allaire SE, Dufour-L’Arrivee C, Lafond JA, Lalancette R, Brodeur J (2008). Carbon dioxide emissions by urban turfgrass areas. Can J Soil Sci 88: 529–532.
  2. Almaraz JJ, Mabood F, Zhou X, Madramootoo C, Rochette P, Ma B, Smith DL (2009). Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes in corn grown under two tillage systems in southwestern Quebec. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73: 113–119.
  3. Alvaro-Fuentes JA, Cantero-Martinez C, Lopez MV, Arrue JL (2007). Soil carbon dioxide fluxes following tillage in semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystems. Soil Till Res 96: 331–341.
  4. Bouyoucos GJ (1926). Estimation of the colloidal material in soils. Science 64: 362. Danevcic T, Mandic-Mulec I, Stres B, Stopar D, Hacin J (2010). Emissions of CO 2, CH 4, and N 2 O from Southern European peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 1437–1446.
  5. Domenico de Dato G, De Angelis P, Sirca C, Beier C (2010). Impact of drought and increasing temperatures on soil CO 2 emissions in a Mediterranean shrubland (gariga). Plant Soil 327: 153–166.
  6. Edwards NT (1982). The use of soda-lime for measuring respiration rates in terrestrial systems. Pedobiologia 23: 321–330.
  7. Friedman JH (1991). Multivariate adaptive regressions splines. Ann Stat 19: 1–67.
  8. Grogan P (1998). CO 2 flux measurement using soda lime: correction for water formed during CO 2 adsorption. Ecology 79: 1467– 14 Iqbal J, Lin S, Hu R, Feng M (2009). Temporal variability of soilatmospheric CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes from different land uses in mid-subtropical China. Atmos Environ 43: 5865–5875.
  9. Janssens IA, Ceulemans R (1998). Spatial variability in forest soil CO 2 efflux assessed with a calibrated soda lime technique. Ecol Lett 1: 95–98.
  10. Janzen HH (1993). Soluble salts. In: Carter MR, editor. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 161–166.
  11. Kacar B (1994). Soil and Plant Analysis III - Soil Analysis. Ankara: Ankara University Agricultural Faculty. Keith H, Wong SC (2006). Measurement of soil CO 2 efflux using soda lime absorption: both quantitative and reliable. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 1121–1131.
  12. Kosugi Y, Mitani T, Ltoh M, Noguchi S, Tani M, Matsuo N, Takanashi S, Ohkubo S, Nik AR (2007). Spatial and temporal variation in soil respiration in a Southeast Asian tropical rainforest. Agric For Met 147: 35–47.
  13. Knudesen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF (1982). Lithium, sodium, and potassium. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keene