Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Rootstock capacity in improving production and quality of triploid watermelon seeds

Pages
298–308
Publication Date
2018-08-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nun 9075/ST 101 and Argentario/ST 101 graft combinations resulted in longer main stems; increased total yield; heavier, longer, and wider fruits; and higher seed yield and number of seeds per fruit as compared to PI 296341/ST 101 graft combination and the controls in both locations and years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate different rootstocks for improving triploid seed production of the dessert watermelon, Citrullus lanatus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This 2-year study was conducted at two locations, in open fields at Antalya and Adana, Turkey, during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nun 9075/ST 101 and Argentario/ST 101 graft combinations resulted in longer main stems; increased total yield; heavier, longer, and wider fruits; and higher seed yield and number of seeds per fruit as compared to PI 296341/ST 101 graft combination and the controls in both locations and years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Graft combinations · seed germination · seed emergence

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate different rootstocks for improving triploid seed production of the dessert watermelon, Citrullus lanatus. This 2-year study was conducted at two locations, in open fields at Antalya and Adana, Turkey, during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons. The tetraploid watermelon line 'ST 101' was used as the female parent scion and the diploid line 'WL 92' as the male parent. Both parental lines were grafted onto three different rootstocks to determine the effect of grafting on seed yield and quality of triploid watermelon. Nun 9075, a Cucurbita interspecific hybrid (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata), Argentario (Lagenaria siceraria), and citron watermelon PI 296341 (Citrullus amarus) were used as rootstocks. Nongrafted ST 101 and WL 92 were also crossed to be used as controls. The graft combinations and controls were compared for performance as measured by length, diameter and number of nodes of main stem, total yield, mean fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, seed yield, number of seed per fruit, weight of 1000 seeds, seed germination and emergence percentage, days to germination and emergence, and seed coat and embryo weight ratio. Nun 9075/ST 101 and Argentario/ST 101 graft combinations resulted in longer main stems; increased total yield; heavier, longer, and wider fruits; and higher seed yield and number of seeds per fruit as compared to PI 296341/ST 101 graft combination and the controls in both locations and years.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLMAZ, İ., SARI, N., KOMBO, M. D., ŞİMŞEK, İ., HUSSEIN, S., NAMLI, M. (2018). Rootstock capacity in improving production and quality of triploid watermelon seeds. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 298–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/180017

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Açıkgöz N (1990). Tarımda Araştırma ve Deneme Metotlari (II. Basim). Yayın No: 478. İzmir, Turkey: Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi (in Turkish). Alan O, Nilay O, Gunen Y (2007). Effect of grafting on watermelon plant growth, yield and quality. J Agron 6: 362-365.
  2. Alan O, Sen F, Duzyaman E (2017). How growing cycles affect plant growth and yield of grafted watermelon combinations. Fresenius Environ Bulletin 26: 4214-4221.
  3. Barbosa WFS, Steiner F, de Oliveira LCM, Henrique P, das Chagas M (2016). Comparison of seed priming techniques with regards to germination and growth of watermelon seedlings in laboratory condition. Afr J Biotechnol 15: 259-2602.
  4. Çandır E, Yetişir H, Karaca F, Üstun D (2013). Phytochemical characteristics of grafted watermelon on different bottle gourds ( Lagenaria siceraria ) collected from the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turk J Agric For 37: 443-456.
  5. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Rea E (2006). Effect of salinity on yield, fruit quality, leaf gas exchange, and mineral composition of grafted watermelon plants. HortScience 4: 622-627.
  6. Cushman KE, Huan J (2008). Performance of four triploid watermelon cultivars grafted onto five rootstock genotypes: yield and fruit quality under commercial growing conditions. Acta Hortic 782: 335-337.
  7. Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P (2005-2006). Rootstock effects on plant vigor and watermelon fruit quality. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 28: 39-42.
  8. Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, Levi A, King SR, Zhang X (2008b). Grafting effects on vegetable quality. HortScience 43: 1670-1672.
  9. Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Sakata Y, Lopez-Galarza S, Maroto JV, Lee SG, Huh YC, Sun Z, Miguel A, King SR et al. (2008a). Cucurbit grafting. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27: 50-74.
  10. Edelstein M, Cohen R, Gur A, Elkabetz M, Pivonia S, Grosch R, Forster P, Schwarz D (2017). Performance of interspecific Cucurbita rootstocks compared to their parental lines. Scientia Hortic 216: 45-50.
  11. Edelstein M, Tyutyunik J, Fallik E, Meir A, Tadmor Y, Cohen R (2014). Horticultural evaluation of exotic watermelon germplasm as potential rootstocks. Sci Hortic 165: 196-202.
  12. Elazar F, Alkalai-Tuvia S, Chalupowicz D, Zutahy Y, Zaaroor M, Beniches M, Gamliel A (2016). Effects of rootstock and soil disinfection on quality of grafted watermelon fruit ( Citrullus lanatus L.): a two-year study. Israel J Plant Sci 63: 38-44.
  13. Fredes A, Rosello S, Beltrán J, Cebolla-Cornejo J, Pérez-de-Castro A, Gisbert C, Picó MB (2016). Fruit quality assessment of watermelons graft