Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Genetic and phenotypic variation among Turkish terrestrial orchid species as revealed by RAPD and morphological characteristics

Pages
227–236
Publication Date
2018-08-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that in the natural population of terrestrial orchid species significant amounts of gene flow are ongoing at intra/interspecies level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Terrestrial orchid species are natural sources of salep and a closely related group of plant species widely distributed throughout Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistical analyses (principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and cluster analysis) using the generated data identified taxonomic and genetic distance within the studied plant samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that in the natural population of terrestrial orchid species significant amounts of gene flow are ongoing at intra/interspecies level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Characterization · terrestrial orchids · Turkey

Abstract

Terrestrial orchid species are natural sources of salep and a closely related group of plant species widely distributed throughout Turkey. The phylogenetic relationship among fourteen different tuber-producing orchid species was investigated after analyzing phenotypic and genetic variation within and among the natural population through fifteen morphometric traits and ten random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primer combinations. Statistical analyses (principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and cluster analysis) using the generated data identified taxonomic and genetic distance within the studied plant samples. The results of PCA from morphological traits show that there are no major groupings within and among different species instead somehow overlapping with few distinctly characterized species. In addition, the UPGMA-based phenogram with Euclidean distance (0-1) produces five major clusters among the studied orchid species according to their taxonomic status with few exceptions. On the other hand, PCoA and the phylogenetic dendrogram with the coefficient (0.56-0.79) from RAPD band profiles determine the true genetic diversity of those species. Although both combinations of genetic and phenotypic characteristics reveal the phylogenetic relationship of some those studied species very effectively, they are not clear for others. These results suggest that in the natural population of terrestrial orchid species significant amounts of gene flow are ongoing at intra/interspecies level. Therefore, it is recommended that conservation studies of these groups of orchid species should be done as a geographical unit rather than according to taxonomic status.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERZURUMLU, G. S., SULTANA, N., VURAL, M., SERÇE, S. (2018). Genetic and phenotypic variation among Turkish terrestrial orchid species as revealed by RAPD and morphological characteristics. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 227–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/179964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahmadian M, Babaei A, Ahmadi N, Rasoli O (2017). Genome size diversity of some species of Cephalanthera from Iran. Caryologia 18: 1-5.
  2. Altundag E, Sevgi E, Kara O, Sevgi O, Tecimen HB, Bolat I (2012). Comparative morphological, anatomical and habitat studies on Dactylorhiza romana (Seb.) Soo subsp. Romana and Dactylorhiza romana (Seb.) Soo subsp. georgica (Klinge) Soo ex. Renz and Taub. (Orchidaceae) in Turkey. Pak J Bot 44: 143- 152. Arduino P, Cianchi R, Rossi W, Corrias B, Bullini L (1995). Genetic variation in Orchis papilionacea ( Orchidaceae ) from Central Mediterranean region: taxonomic inferences at the intraspecific level. Plant Syst Evol 194: 9-23.
  3. Arduino P, Verra F, Cianchi R, Rossi W, Corrias B, Bullini L (1996). Genetic variation and natural hybridization between Orchis laxiflora and Orchis palustris (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 202: 87-109.
  4. Aremu CO (2017). Genetic diversity: a review for need and measurements for intraspecies crop improvement. J Microbiol Biotechn Research 1: 80-85.
  5. Aybeke M, Sezik E, Olgun G (2010).
  6. Vegetative anatomy of some Ophrys, Orchis and Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) taxa in Trakya region of Turkey. Flora 205: 73-89.
  7. Balestrini R, Nerva L, Sillo F, Girlanda M, Perotto S (2014). Plant and fungal gene expression in mycorrhizal protocorms of the orchid Serapias vomeracea colonized by Tulasnella calospora. Plant Signal Behav 9: e977707. Batty AL, Dixon KW, Brundrett MC, Sivasithamparam K (2002). Orchid conservation and mycorrhizal associations. In: Sivasithamparam K, Dixon KW, Barrett RL, editors. Microorganisms in Plant Conservation and Biodiversity. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 195-226.
  8. Caputo P, Aceto S, Cozzolıno S, Nazzaro R (1997). Morphological and molecular characterization of a natural hybrid between Orchis laxiflora and O. morio (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 205: 147-155.
  9. Curuk P, Sogut Z, Izgu T, Sevindik B, Tagipur EM, da Silva JA, Serce S, Solmaz I, Kacar YA, Mendi NY (2016). Morphological characterization of Cyclamen sp. grown naturally in Turkey: Part II. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 15: 205-224.
  10. Dalar A, Konczak I (2012). Botanicals from Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey: antioxidant capacity and phenolic constituents of endemic herbal medicines. J Herb Med 2: 126-135.
  11. Dalar A, Konczak I (2013). Phenolic contents, antioxidant capacities and inhibitory activities against key metabolic syndrome relevant enzymes of herbal teas from Eastern Anatolia. Ind Crops Prod 44: 383-390.
  12. Dellaporta SL, Wood J